Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Headphone jack in the 18w charger so you can listen to the electricity?


Removing the jack was a dumb move. People have tons of Apple headphones that will slowly make their way into landfills. Lots of plastic just sitting there while we’re forced to buy new ones.

Oh well, bring on 2019. New chargers, new headphones, and new cables! Queue the Apple committed to the environment segment to kickoff Monday’s event.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas
Is there anything preventing the next iPhones from adopting USB-C? If they think headphone ports should be obsolete, they should consider making the lightning port obsolete as well. It just doesn't make sense to have more than one type of port on any device, ever. Also, when it comes to headphones, if they think people should adopt wireless headphones, they should make a pair that prioritizes sound quality above all, none of this Beats crap.

Apple doesn't do things to benefit consumers, they do things to benefit themselves. USB-C would be good for us, so we wont get it. Headphone jack is bad for Apple, so they dropped it.
 
I’m not buying another iPhone until it is usb-c both of my MacBook pros have a usb c charger , my iPad has a usb c charger. I can take one cable to charge them all but always need to bring a lightning cable and it’s annoying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stylinexpat
Wow - that's really putting the planet first. If they do that I'll be sure to throw my current smartphone away every 18 months so I can buy a new greener one.

...but seriously folks, that's actually a more sensible idea, and it would, of course, be accompanied by a price cut /s (aw, drat! I must have got out of the snarky side of bed this morning).

Or (desperately trying to be serious) how about leaving out all the accessories and including a voucher for the charger and cable of your choice (which will inevitably depend on what other USB-A/C/Lightning gear you already use, so you're never going to please all of the people all of the time)?
There is no simple way for Apple to not ship a charger. Even if they wanted to reduce the price, it would move them away from 'round' numbers which they wouldn't want. A voucher would be an idea but would add complexity (in that stores would have handle additional boxes). Or if they offered a selection of chargers and/or cables to choose from both in in-store and online, it would also add complexity.

Maybe the simplest idea (assuming most people wouldn't want to get a charger) would be an AppStore/iTunes voucher with every phone (that ships without a charger). Putting one into every box should be simple and 'cashing' it in is handled online without any additional logistics at the store. Though, would this then need to be included with every phone until the end of time?
 
Care to elaborate? There’s a whole ecosystem build on Lightning. The port opening on the phone side is smaller.

Except for things like power delivery in USB-C, most things can be done by Lightning as well, some other would probably be possible with some Firmware update.

Yes, USB-C is bound to rule the (future) market, but that does not automatically equal Lightning being already antiquated.

Lightning is a better connector design in my opinion.

However, There is a much larger "ecosystem" around USB-C. Apple have already begun the transition to lightning, As have everyone else. The sooner they get their entire product line using the same connector standard the better.

Lightning is "antiquated" in the fact that we already know they'll have to drop it in the near future
 
Not alone, but all the cheapness adds up. Lower quality screens, lower capacity batteries, minimum RAM, low base storage with obscene markups for upgrades, lower quality charger, no headphone jack...
They don’t waste money on items that cause the price of the phone to rise without adding to the user experience. Every item on your list is challengeable especially since the list is generic and could apply to AirPods. Especially the headphone jack. And yet their phones last 6 years+ like my 5s. Carry on.

But to original point I guess all of these added up to $84B.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
Only an iPhone Pro will come with USB-C
Which may be $1700-1800 like the iPad Pro in order to get 6GB of RAM o_O

Even on that model Apple did not really tell us the specs and speed of the USB C port on that iPad Pro when hooked up to an iMac or MacBook Pro
 
Yawn.

I can buy a $9.99 USB-C quick charger at the local bodega.

The biggest slap in the face to Apple customers is doubling down on the Lightning connector.
 
iPad Pro has reasons to switch to USB-C; 10 Gbps bandwidth allows several devices to be connected. For instance you can use a hub and have Gigabit Ethernet, a 4K/5K display, a USB hard disk, a USB keyboard, a camera, and a SD card reader. That type of requirement is uncommon and it’s firmly in the realm of iPad Pro, not even less expensive iPads—and certainly not iPhone.

There are well over a billion lightning iOS devices, with billions more chargers and cables currently in use, and there’s no reason to obsolete them.

By this logic, monitors should never have moved on from VGA and later HDMI, computers to Bluetooth peripherals, Mac from PowerPC to Intel, and horses to cars. :rolleyes:
 
iPad Pro has reasons to switch to USB-C; 10 Gbps bandwidth allows several devices to be connected. For instance you can use a hub and have Gigabit Ethernet, a 4K/5K display, a USB hard disk, a USB keyboard, a camera, and a SD card reader. That type of requirement is uncommon and it’s firmly in the realm of iPad Pro, not even less expensive iPads—and certainly not iPhone.

There are well over a billion lightning iOS devices, with billions more chargers and cables currently in use, and there’s no reason to obsolete them.
The chargers will not get obsolete as long as the original phones are in use. New phones always come with a charger anyways. Your logic does not make sense.
 
Lightning is a better connector design in my opinion.

Probably true, and its a pity that USB-C didn't go down the Lightning-like route - but at least USB-C is more credible than Micro-USB (Esp. the USB3 version which is nearly as big as the old 30-pin connector), which was the alternative when Lightning was introduced. I mean, I have devices with MicroUSB and it works but... bleergh!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrUNIMOG
If this is the case, I would most definitely upgrade from my iPhone XS Max. Although I do have Jump! on Demand by T-Mobile, I was considering not upgrading this year but this would put that thought to rest.



Yes, it will hurt at first, more for people and businesses who have wall adapters with integrated USB A ports, like cars that require it for CarPlay, but it could come with an adapter. It's time to move on and the transition needs to come sooner rather than later. Also, you would likely still be able to use your old chargers and keep living in the dark ages, if that will make you happy.

USB-C is quickly becoming the global standard, and is already the standard for new non Apple devices. I haven't had one USB-C cable fail or break on me yet. I can't count how many times I replaced a Lightning cable. Lightning cable is simply inferior to USB-C and Apple needs to get rid of it.

All I can say is “damn, this is fascinating”.

USB-C or not, people will buy new devices at some point.

But I do want to point out that “global standard” thing. Yes, it is global standard. No, the progress of this port being widely used is as slow as when USB-A was introduced. I will more than likely to witness how the overall transition goes.
 
Switching iphones to USB-C would be tragic in a world full of USB-A charging ports, cables and accessories. I don’t want to have to replace a dozen Lightning cables and accessories when I don’t even own one USB-C device. The vast majority of Apple customers own Lightning and USB-A products. USB-C only applies to a small minority of Apple customers worldwide. When I finally upgrade my iPhone it will be to Qi charging which is available at far more locations than USB-C
Don't give Apple the idea to remove the charging port because Qi is the future.
 



Japanese Mac blog Macotakara posted a new report tonight which indicates that Apple will maintain the Lightning connector on the 2019 iPhones but may finally be including a 18W Fast Charger and USB-C to Lightning cable.

5c93663e5f0e1.jpg

The inclusion would represent an upgrade to the currently shipping 5W USB adapter. The 18W adapter allows fast charging with iPhone X charging from 1% to 79% in one hour.

This rumor actually contradicts a previous report by the same site which expected Apple to retain the 5W adapter. Macotakara also reiterates Ming-Chi Kuo's report that this year's iPhones will have ability to wirelessly charge other devices.

Article Link: 2019 iPhones May Include 18W Fast Charger and USB-C to Lightning Cable
Well, this is good news. But they should've included this gadget a long time before.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.