Phone manufacturers have recently been racing to boost their camera lens counts to three, four, or even five in an arms race to make their devices stand out with unique features.
Apple would never do something so ridiculous as this.
- Sent from my bent iPad Pro
If it does look like this they will say it's the best 3 camera lens design, all other camera layout are ugly and Huawei copied the design and put it in their 2018 flagship.LMAO! That is so disgusting. I wonder how many people will defend that design knowing how bad it is?
Why do phones need so many cameras now? I know, I sound like an old coot...but why is this necessary? The Galaxy S10 is supposedly going to have 4 lenses on the back...can't wait for the iPhone 15 with 10 lenses.
But I used to think the notch was dumb and now I like it, so I guess it's only a matter of time before I start saying "you can never have too many cameras".
I’d much rather Apple work on getting rid of the camera bump instead of adding another lens.
LMAO! That is so disgusting. I wonder how many people will defend that design knowing how bad it is?
Why do phones need so many cameras now? I know, I sound like an old coot...but why is this necessary? The Galaxy S10 is supposedly going to have 4 lenses on the back...can't wait for the iPhone 15 with 10 lenses.
lolI always thought that the ever increasing camera number on phones reminded me of the number of blades being added to disposable razors in the early 2000's...
This is the razor version of phone cameras:
Maybe one day the rear side of phones will just be a bunch of cameras....
It's a long story, and a comment on a forum is not going to be very polished answer, but the thing is that if you have some millimeters to work with as device height, there's only so much you can do with a single sensor and very small optics. You can't really cheat physics.
However, if you can sample things more there are a lot of stuff that you can do better. You can do temporal and/or spatial sampling (e.g. taking images), but something needs to be done. With temporal sampling you need capture time, with spatial sampling you need lenses. These can be used to, but not limited to:
Of course, you could always say that "heck with it" and not care of the improvements, but alas, that's another discussion. And yes, that is a hideous bump.
- Noise reduction
- Low light performance
- Super resolution
- HDR
- Depth of field effect(s)
- Etc. (and I'm leaving some cool stuff out on purpose)
TIL I hang out purely with the 0.1%.Why? 99.9% of the planet uses a case, and it sits flush with the back of a case.