It is and they must!The NFL and gambling is so hypercritical. The NFL gets in bed with gambling firms, moves a franchise to Las Vegas and then states gambling is bad and players/staff must avoid it.
You don't need to convince me. Its the NFL that is sending inconsistent messages, its one thing to suspend a player for gambling and quite another to be in a business relationship with fandual/ceasars/draftkings.You understand that, right?
This was one of the major concerns of having a team based on Las Vegas. I'm not sure (as a non-gambler) how easy or hard it is working in Las Vegas but prohibited from certain activities.But the NFL needs to take strong steps to nip this in the bud.
Hopkins' history with Patriots OC, Bill O'Brien, probably played a part. BOB traded Nuk to the Cardinals for a 3rd round pick during his bid to be Houston's football tsar. A THIRD rounder! That's an insulting low value for the best WR at the time.Titans expected to sign WR DeAndre Hopkins
Looks like the Pats lost their best opportunity to improve their offense and have a more fighting chance in the AFC East.
Hopkins' history with Patriots OC, Bill O'Brien, probably played a part. BOB traded Nuk to the Cardinals for a 3rd round pick during his bid to be Houston's football tsar. A THIRD rounder! That's an insulting low value for the best WR at the time.
I won't knock a player for taking money, they have such short window for making hay that they need to get it while they can. Also I'm sure pride comes into play, do you want to be a big fish in a small pond, or a big fish in a large pond with other big fish?Hopkins took money over winning. Cheifs, Bills, Ravens were the best chances to win.
That's partially true; the first part is. But they get enough in their first year to "survive" until they can get a job flipping hamburgers or bagging groceries. One year of $1M salary is equivalent to 50 years at $20,000.* Sure, you can burn $1M in a hurry, if you're not too smart.I won't knock a player for taking money, they have such short window for making hay that they need to get it while they can.
I won't knock a player for taking money, they have such short window for making hay that they need to get it while they can. Also I'm sure pride comes into play, do you want to be a big fish in a small pond, or a big fish in a large pond with other big fish?
I'm not 100% sold the Hopkins of old, will reappear in Tenn, I'm not saying the Patriots dodge a bullet, they're that much less potent now and they need all of the help they can get in a sacked conference.
As we get closer to training camp, it will be interesting to see where the unemployed running backs land. I think Cook will sign with some team, but I'm not sold that Zeke will. I also think they're now learning a tough lesson, that modern day football does not value the running back position.
I see your point, but what happens if we change it from Hopkins to some senior software developer choosing to go to Google, over Apple, simply because Google was paying more and offering more incentives? The statement "how much is enough" kind of falls flat.For a younger player, I can see it. But Hopkins surely has made huge money so far in his career. How much is enough?
Hopkins took money over winning. Cheifs, Bills, Ravens were the best chances to win.
A SB ring isn't a sure thing, but $$$ is.I won't knock a player for taking money, they have such short window for making hay that they need to get it while they can.
Nuk is a high end WR2 at this stage in his career. If he took a massive pay cut to play for the Chiefs or Bills, he'd be the 3rd/4th read. That would be a difficult transition for a guy used to being the #1 option.Also I'm sure pride comes into play, do you want to be a big fish in a small pond, or a big fish in a large pond with other big fish?
He's got a better chance of winning in the laughably weak AFC South--either starting 2 rookie QB or 2 career backup--instead of loaded AFC East 2 featuring elite QB.I'm not 100% sold the Hopkins of old, will reappear in Tenn, I'm not saying the Patriots dodge a bullet, they're that much less potent now and they need all of the help they can get in a sacked conference.
I see your point, but what happens if we change it from Hopkins to some senior software developer choosing to go to Google, over Apple, simply because Google was paying more and offering more incentives? The statement "how much is enough" kind of falls flat.
The Chief's have no cap space at the moment and the Bills are right there as well with very little cap space. It seems there was only a couple of teams, interested, willing and able to pay for Hopkins. I have no idea how much he has in the bank, but it doesn't matter, I wouldn't knock a player for getting the most he can. I mean why bother having that money stay in the billionaire owner's bank account?
I think you're missing my point.Yes, but
Sure you can. While the money pro players make is obscenely high. I'll go out on a limb and state people working at apple/google/MSFT make obscenely high amounts of money as well. Its truely an apples to apples comparison since an employee shouldn't be knocked for bettering his position, nor should a NFL player. Just my $.02you can't really compare the two.
Tell that to the Chief's they were the ones that seemingly didn't pursue Hopkins very hard. I'm not defending KC or the Buff, just pointing out that they used up their capAs far as salary caps go, teams always find a way
Interesting insights by Tom Curran on the Rich Eisen show. He postulates that BB is most definitely on the hot seat and I tend to agree. Curran implies that Belichick was completely at fault by not giving Brady what he wanted in 2019. I tend to agree with all of Curran said in this interview.
Basically what Curran is stating is the hot seat started in 2019 with BB's inability to sign Brady - in all honesty he should have moved heaven and earth to keep him and the subsequent years were largely failures. That hot seat has not cooled but only gotten hotter with each misstep.Considering Brady retired now, I don't know if 2019 is a factor any more
Let me also add now that every team in the AFC east has markedly improved except for the Patriots, its only going to be harder for Belichick.
It will certainly be fun this season as all of those teams try to live up to the hype and excitement.It seems the AFC is the clear dominant conference this season
The AFC certainly has the top tier QBs…It seems the AFC is the clear dominant conference this season. Every time a "name" guy signed, its in the AFC.
The AFC certainly has the top tier QBs…
Burrow, Allen, Mahomes, Jackson, Rodgers, etc.
If all of these guys live up to the hype... it is going to be another good season in the AFC. The NFC right now...