Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The Michigan/Texas game was a fun game to watch, until the 4th quarter and that's when Texas took over. I give credit to Manning for maturing and growing during the season. He was ill equipped to be a starter in september but he improved and grew. Good for him. Given the portal and NIL, I have no idea whether Texas can keep the team together and try for a national championship run next season

I was very happy with the outcome of course, and it's been fun to watch Manning get better over the course of the season. Hopefully a lot of the guys will follow the example set by Ewers. We'll see!
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Well I didn’t expect THAT game but we (the Oregon Ducks) shut out Texas Tech this morning! What a show of defense on BOTH teams. I’m so excited that we’re advancing and now I can relax and watch Alabama play Indiana. (I’m rooting for ‘Bama) Roll Tide!

So proud of my Ducks!
 
Well I didn’t expect THAT game but we (the Oregon Ducks) shut out Texas Tech this morning! What a show of defense on BOTH teams. I’m so excited that we’re advancing and now I can relax and watch Alabama play Indiana. (I’m rooting for ‘Bama) Roll Tide!

So proud of my Ducks!

That was a crazy crazy game
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: C0ncreteBl0nde
1767347519013.png



I was beginning to believe 'bama wouldn't score...

I believe that Indiana is a train that can't be stopped.

1767347537724.png
 
Some really good games, what seems to be more then a coincidence is occuring as well. Last year all of the teams that had byes lost, this year only one team with the bye won.

I bet Lane Kiffin is kicking himself now, his team that dominated Georgia is being coached by someone else.

Oregon won, but it was a sloppy game, I think it was more due to the fact that Texas Tech had no offense, they just couldn't put anything together - in part due to the Duck's defense but also because they just were horrible.

Nice to see Indiana play so well, and dominate Alabama
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
well I turned off the Indy-Alie game early when Kirk Herbie stated the obvious,
"The Tide is just there playing, but not trying to be better, just playing without any guts!"
he was correct as I was done with "20-sumtins" yesterday so I avoided the later game.
boy can I use a break until next Thursday.

see ya's then!
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Once the second half of the Alabama/Indiana game occurred the talking heads struggled to keep people engaged given that the game was out of hand, and it was clear Alabama had given up the fight
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
I think I'm rooting for Ole Miss to win the whole thing, for no other reason than a big F U to Kiffin. That guy is a monumental clown. 😛
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
No disrepect to the participants in the Fiesta Bowl, but if someone were to say that the Peach Bowl will be the true championship game, I wouldn't disagree with them.

THE losers of the Cotton Bowl, and ND can sulk in their shoulda/coulda/woulda fantasies all offseason.

And Coach DeBoer may try to comfort himself, and his team by saying there is a fine line that separated them from greatness, but they played like they were ten feet away from it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
THE losers of the Cotton Bowl, and ND can sulk in their shoulda/coulda/woulda fantasies all offseason.
Here's the issue as I see it

Both Texas 10-3 and Notre Dame 10-2 were excluded in the CFP as James Madison and Tulane were picked in their places. JMU's record 12-1, Tulane 11-2, both winners in their respective conferences.

However their records are such that they largely did not play any teams of high caliber or ranked teams, where as both Texas and ND had.

The results were predictable, where those two teams when faced with quality programs were crushed.

Regarding the cotton bowl, I was quite surprised (and pleased) with Ohio State not showing up for the game. I don't follow that program but I think there were events behind the scenes including the HC taking over play calling did not help them at all.

At the end of day, you're correct with should have/would have/could have but what did happen was that the NCAA put out a really poor showing in the first round of the play offs and caused more focus on what's broken with the playoffs, where some excellent teams were ignored in favor for considerably weaker teams

With that said, people have been calling for the smaller conferences to be included in the playoffs and how unfair it is to ignore them - they're not wrong, but then this is the result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm
Here's the issue as I see it

Both Texas 10-3 and Notre Dame 10-2 were excluded in the CFP as James Madison and Tulane were picked in their places. JMU's record 12-1, Tulane 11-2, both winners in their respective conferences.

However their records are such that they largely did not play any teams of high caliber or ranked teams, where as both Texas and ND had.

The results were predictable, where those two teams when faced with quality programs were crushed.

Regarding the cotton bowl, I was quite surprised (and pleased) with Ohio State not showing up for the game. I don't follow that program but I think there were events behind the scenes including the HC taking over play calling did not help them at all.

At the end of day, you're correct with should have/would have/could have but what did happen was that the NCAA put out a really poor showing in the first round of the play offs and caused more focus on what's broken with the playoffs, where some excellent teams were ignored in favor for considerably weaker teams

With that said, people have been calling for the smaller conferences to be included in the playoffs and how unfair it is to ignore them - they're not wrong, but then this is the result.

Yeah. there is no need for teams like Tulane, or JMU in the big show if we are honest.
 
Here's the issue as I see it

Both Texas 10-3 and Notre Dame 10-2 were excluded in the CFP as James Madison and Tulane were picked in their places. JMU's record 12-1, Tulane 11-2, both winners in their respective conferences.

However their records are such that they largely did not play any teams of high caliber or ranked teams, where as both Texas and ND had.

The results were predictable, where those two teams when faced with quality programs were crushed.

Regarding the cotton bowl, I was quite surprised (and pleased) with Ohio State not showing up for the game. I don't follow that program but I think there were events behind the scenes including the HC taking over play calling did not help them at all.

At the end of day, you're correct with should have/would have/could have but what did happen was that the NCAA put out a really poor showing in the first round of the play offs and caused more focus on what's broken with the playoffs, where some excellent teams were ignored in favor for considerably weaker teams

With that said, people have been calling for the smaller conferences to be included in the playoffs and how unfair it is to ignore them - they're not wrong, but then this is the result.

I don't think anyone would call the CFP perfect.

It is the product of the schools/conferences/TV networks efforts to reconcile what a competitive* postseason tournament looks like, where everyone gets their piece of the pie, but still obviously driven by, and biased toward, the P4 conferences. It must still try to appear fair, if not magnanimous, and represent a "true" national championship where everyone is represented and given a fair shot to succeed. However unlikely it is for the smaller schools.

The CFP ostensibly represents all of D1FBS CFB, not just the P4 conferences and their best teams, plus the exceptionalist isolationists at the school in South Bend.

American sports entertainment isn't as cutthroat as it is in other places, otherwise we'd have relegation and the crappy teams in our leagues wouldn't have a shot at all.

It is what it is, and everyone knows what the rules are.

* Consider the alternative, the pre-CFP system where individual bowl matchups were based on conference records, but with each game still played in isolation, and the final champion determined by polling, not a game. And worse, with more than one poll, there were different results and years with no consensus as what the final rankings were.

Would that be any better? Now, at least the teams have to play each other to determine the ultimate victor.
 
I don't think anyone would call the CFP perfect.

It is the product of the schools/conferences/TV networks efforts to reconcile what a competitive* postseason tournament looks like, where everyone gets their piece of the pie, but still obviously driven by, and biased toward, the P4 conferences. It must still try to appear fair, if not magnanimous, and represent a "true" national championship where everyone is represented and given a fair shot to succeed. However unlikely it is for the smaller schools.

The CFP ostensibly represents all of D1FBS CFB, not just the P4 conferences and their best teams, plus the exceptionalist isolationists at the school in South Bend.

American sports entertainment isn't as cutthroat as it is in other places, otherwise we'd have relegation and the crappy teams in our leagues wouldn't have a shot at all.

It is what it is, and everyone knows what the rules are.

* Consider the alternative, the pre-CFP system where individual bowl matchups were based on conference records, but with each game still played in isolation, and the final champion determined by polling, not a game. And worse, with more than one poll, there were different results and years with no consensus as what the final rankings were.

Would that be any better? Now, at least the teams have to play each other to determine the ultimate victor.
I think about this a lot. Were we better off when everyone just played their bowl game and bowl games mattered? The National Championship was nice, but not the point of college football.

Then again, as my wife reminded me, we had a ton of bowl games where people sat out because the game didn't really matter compared to being drafted. This approach of the CFP is probably the best of the bad options.

Probably we need to get to a 64 team league with 4 conferences (SEC, etc.,), and a standard setup like the NFL. Then everyone else goes into another playoff system with another winner. (similar to FCS.) I bet this is what they end up doing eventually. It's a disaster right now in a lot of ways for the smaller schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheIntruder
I think about this a lot. Were we better off when everyone just played their bowl game and bowl games mattered? The National Championship was nice, but not the point of college football.

Then again, as my wife reminded me, we had a ton of bowl games where people sat out because the game didn't really matter compared to being drafted. This approach of the CFP is probably the best of the bad options.

Probably we need to get to a 64 team league with 4 conferences (SEC, etc.,), and a standard setup like the NFL. Then everyone else goes into another playoff system with another winner. (similar to FCS.) I bet this is what they end up doing eventually. It's a disaster right now in a lot of ways for the smaller schools.

I have said they should be doing this since they started this. Makes way to much sense. WAY to much.
 
I think about this a lot. Were we better off when everyone just played their bowl game and bowl games mattered? The National Championship was nice, but not the point of college football.

Then again, as my wife reminded me, we had a ton of bowl games where people sat out because the game didn't really matter compared to being drafted. This approach of the CFP is probably the best of the bad options.

Probably we need to get to a 64 team league with 4 conferences (SEC, etc.,), and a standard setup like the NFL. Then everyone else goes into another playoff system with another winner. (similar to FCS.) I bet this is what they end up doing eventually. It's a disaster right now in a lot of ways for the smaller schools.

The "Super League" model has been tossed around by people, including former coaches like Chip Kelly, but until the conferences can reconcile their differences, especially the SEC and Big Ten, the path to a larger tournament will be difficult.

And since the CFB postseason is controlled by the conferences, and not the NCAA like in hoops, the effort to include the smaller schools, which are token anyway, are even harder to muster.

The entity that holds the power, but hasn't overtly exerted it, is TV. If ESPN got everyone in the same room and more firmly said, "this is what we want and how the pot will be split, everyone will get their fair share, otherwise, good luck," it might help speed the process along.

Hoops has it easier because the two primary negotiators are CBS and the NCAA, and everyone pretty much accepts, if not respects, the decisions of the selection committee, with less questioning of the system (cough, ND this season). In CFB, there are two alpha conferences, two more that can say "hey, wait…" and the smaller ones that get thrown a bone to try to make it look fair.

But, schools are selfish, and there is no franchise or charter system like in the pros where everyone, even the worst franchises, have some sort of vested assurance, and they all recognize that a strong NFL benefits everybody regardless of their field records.

And you also gotta admit that controversy and turmoil is also part and parcel of CFB.

Ultimately, everyone has their own idea of what CFB is, or should represent, but for most, I'd say money is the key factor, not principle.

This season has shown a program that considers itself to hold the highest standards, literally took its ball and stayed home because it didn't get the benefit of the doubt, then attacked the system, after finding that the sense of privilige that has benefitted it in the past, doesn't always work, particularly in this current era where the objective factors overshadow the subjective more than in the past. It didn't get what it thought it deserved, or thought it was entitled to, threw a fit, and opted to stay home. What kind of example does that set for its students and fans, or the sport in general?
 
im just chiming in stating how "tired and worn out sport-wise" I am of anticipating the Thursday night UMiami game.
these 12 team playoffs are too much as they need to trim this to 6 qualified teams in the future
but that won't happen since money and the other reason money

my bones feel weak just thinking of watching this Thursday's game as I have no idea who the 'Canes are playing
if that actually matters, I know that Georgia lost and Indy-ducky is Friday as I can't pinpoint that opponent.

I guess this is not the sport for me to enjoy anymore?
 
im just chiming in stating how "tired and worn out sport-wise" I am of anticipating the Thursday night UMiami game.
these 12 team playoffs are too much as they need to trim this to 6 qualified teams in the future
but that won't happen since money and the other reason money

my bones feel weak just thinking of watching this Thursday's game as I have no idea who the 'Canes are playing
if that actually matters, I know that Georgia lost and Indy-ducky is Friday as I can't pinpoint that opponent.

I guess this is not the sport for me to enjoy anymore?

yeah, it's a little much...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.