No doubt and no disagreement
Well they certainly can't improve the team by way of free agency, nor can they keep some or many of the current players who are fee agents. So while they have a proven QB, the holes they fill by way of drafting and their draft position isn't ideal, though with the talent they have on the roster, they may be able to jump up in the first round if there's someone specific they want
I've said this before, in the context of baseball, but having good scouts, strong farm system, and home-grown talent is the best and cheapest way to success. The conditions in the NFL differ, but the principle still resonates for all sports franchises.
Free agents are like a nice piece of furniture, which can spiff up an already nice house, and make it into a true showplace, but inside a run-down shack, does little to help the cause, and won't help get it featured in Architectural Digest.
Well-run organizations have greater chances at success because they have the expertise, and experience to excel.
Poorly run organizations that continually swap out leadership, change philosophies according to their latest messiahs, and generally don't know how to manage the cap, draft good players, and coach them…well, the results speak for themselves, again and again.
Actually a great example of this is the current NBA Boston Celtics. They just hit 2nd place behind the Pistons in the Eastern Conference. NBA obviously has different 'salary cap' rules, but regardless they found themselves with their biggest star with a torn ACL and massive salary tax penalties coming unless they cut WAY back.
So they parted ways with FOUR of their top 9 players by minutes including 2 starters and their 6th man from the championship season two years ago, got themselves back closer to the 'salary cap' (which feels imaginary since 28 or 30 teams are over the cap).
Absolutely agree that if Mahomes comes back like Brady in 2009 and if a decent set of tools are available, the Chiefs can be a force in the next couple of years.
The Patriots are another example. A generational QB, and an extended run of success with a core of featured players, and enough of a supporting cast to get the job done. I'm no fan of Belichick, his demeanor, however amusing it was at times, nor the general way the franchise comported itself, but he was masterful at being able to support Brady, and a few select skill players, with a cast of mostly anonymous supporting players who did their job and got the results, year after year during their run.
100% agreed.
Who wants to coach us though?
What's JaMarcus doing these days? I guess his fledgling coaching career got derailed by that one indiscretion…
Somebody check Mendoza's locker for empty cough syrup bottles before they draft him! But seriously, he sounds like a 180-degree in character.
The season-ending Scapegoat Tuesday also claimed OC Kingsbury in DC, and heads also rolled in Detroit. Two teams that were seemingly poised to become the next NFC powers both missed the playoffs this year.
Daniels was the darling of the league at the end of least season, but I don't know what KK could have done with that offense when he so many missed games.
A lot of things have to go right to have a winning season and win the SB, even just once, and nothing is guaranteed. Gotta prove it again next season. Which makes the Patriots' and Chiefs' runs more remarkable, even if they made it boring for everyone else.