Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it just me or is 3D touch just "force touch" with a different name?

Force touch on MacBook is pressure sensitive. 3D touch activates when there's a increase in fingerprint. 3rd party stylist probably won't activate the 3D touch. We will probably get pressure sensitive screens in a couple years since it's now available in the iPad pro.
 
How will anyone know what they can and can't "3D Touch?" Will every app have to come with a manual that we read ahead of time? Are we supposed to 3D Touch everything we see to try to figure it out with every app?

Yes and no.

A good design should be intuitive. Nothing wrong to try every items if you don't mind to look silly, however it's obvious that the main object in a particular apps, should have 3D touch.
 
This really feels like a thing Apple went through a lot of trouble to develop, just to have it ultimately not make much of a difference to most people. Android accomplishes similar functionality (yes, I know, not the same, but similar enough... get over it) with a long press and intents, and it works beautifully.

When I saw the peak demo I immediately envisioned the following scenario... "oh, without any forethought lemme hover this address that isn't conveniently at the lower middle of the screen but is actually near the top. I wanna see that peak! Damnit, the peak is under my hand. Lemme see if I can reposition without losing the... nope, it's gone. Ok, lemme find a way to scroll the highlighted address to a more advantageous location for peaking... I want that peak! Bam, it's there! Now lemme get that peak!" ... This isn't efficiency. At least it doesn't seem like it to me. And it would completely confuse my mom who presses everything as though she's not sure if she's finished pressing or not.

I can see some neat applications for this, for sure... Games and creativity tools especially. But not any day-to-day functionality that can't be replicated without a pressure sensitive screen.

Also, butt dials are gonna get lots more interesting depending on how the dialer incorporates 3d features!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: S G
3D touch sounds interesting, but I feel like my Note 3 and Shield Tablet already function the same way by pressing and holding on messages, links, screens, etc. (One of my favorite Android features.) Am I wrong for thinking this is apples first gimmick?

Before you go saying I'm an android fan, note that I have an iPhone 5S and iPhone 6 for my personal phones and I also use an iPad mini and I only own Mac computers. My android devices are for work.

It doesn't work like that. The idea behind a 3D touch is, touching an object behind the screen to simulate an effect of 3D reaction. In other words, when you touch a surface of water, it ripples visually through your eyes, it ripples sensory through your skin, it ripples vocally through your ear, and when you touch it a second time, the ripples change again, and that's the idea. Practically, along to Apple philosophy, it enriches your user experience in using iPhone by giving you a more "sensory" reactions when you interact with any "objects" on the screen.

It's not "gimmick" as in being something your won't use. Apple must restrict the way it's being done to be a lot more subtle, so you won't realise it's there but you are using it everytime you interact an objects intuitively.

Think about a box in front of you. How do you interact with it? You can push, pull, move it aside, etc. But it won't satisfy with that, you need a feedback too, say, it will vibrate? fine, what else? if I push it this way, it reveals a menu? Okay, that's good. What about if I push it that way? It will tells you more information...

The implementation is almost limitless. And exciting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vito
Apple seems to be interested in saving our time - in seconds and fractions of seconds with the watch and 3D touch - inventions designed to quicken common smartphone tasks. Is it innovation?
 
So when users switch from their new 3d touch iPhone to their non 3d touch iPad (using the same iOS) and they instinctively try and use force touch, nothing is going to happen or worse unexpected results such as the icons jiggling on the home screen instead of bringing up a menu, this is going to get pretty irritating, pretty quickly!
Let's hope that apple have thought of this!
 
So when users switch from their new 3d touch iPhone to their non 3d touch iPad (using the same iOS) and they instinctively try and use force touch, nothing is going to happen or worse unexpected results such as the icons jiggling on the home screen instead of bringing up a menu, this is going to get pretty irritating, pretty quickly!
Let's hope that apple have thought of this!

As I said, it will be way more subtle than icons jiggling on the home screen. Different pressures will yield different results, a mere touch won't bringing up the menu unless you push a little bit harder. You are going to get used to it, pretty quickly.
 
I don't understand why they didn't just stick with Force Touch - they already established a brand name used in Apple Watch and MacBooks, it makes no sense to change it.
because its a different technology. Even if they do similar things they are completely different technologies. Maybe force touch couldn't work on the iphones after trying for a long time.
 
As I said, it will be way more subtle than icons jiggling on the home screen. Different pressures will yield different results, a mere touch won't bringing up the menu unless you push a little bit harder. You are going to get used to it, pretty quickly.

What I am saying is it's going to get very frustrating switching from an iOS 3d touch device, (iPhone 6s) to a non 3d touch device (such as an iPad) as you will instinctively try and use 3d touch.

Let's hope Apple hasn't deliberately hidden normal features in iOS 9 in order to Show off 3d touch, which will make the iOS harder to use on iPads and older phones not supporting it.
 
They wasted their time.

Oh to have steve back...
People like you always make me laugh..... prognosticating apple's impending doom....... The thing will sell millions.

Let's go back to Apple's demo of 3D touch in terms of checking your mail. When you go into your Inbox currently, what do you see? You see who the mail message is from, when you received it, the Subject of the message, and the first two lines of the body of the message. You can go into Settings and change it to see up to 5 lines of the body of the message. But technically that IS you're preview of the mail message you got.

Now with 3D touch you press on that preview to see yet another bigger preview of your mail message, then press harder to actually open it up. Where as now it's a two step process of seeing the preview and tapping on it to open it, with 3D Touch it's now a 3 step process of two previews then seeing the actual message.

That's not efficiency, that's Apples illusion of efficiency wrapped around a shiny piece of candy and our eyes glaze over totally oblivious to the obvious that's it's the total opposite of simplicity and ease of use.

What we have now is simplistic and is all that is necessary to accomplish what we need to and see at a glance what we need to. If you need to see all that was shown in the bigger preview via 3D Touch, you might as well just open the message and read it.
No you have it wrong... it's not a "preview" it's the actual email, text what ever. They call it a "preview" but it's clearly not.
 
Last edited:
People like you always make me laugh..... prognosticating apple's impending doom....... The thing will sell millions.

And people like you, who dismiss valid criticism and instead defend Apple unconditionally?

I think in this case people see it as a gimmick, something to differentiate Apple phones, but mostly for marketing reasons.

Of course Apple will sell millions, the question is, will they keep on selling millions going forward? With recent performance, that's in doubt right now.
 
Big Deal !! Not.

This has got to be a gimmick and more annoying than anything else. And no I am not an iPhone / Apple basher, I have one and also a Samsung.

The same type of thing can be achieved by just sitting on a location for a longer time than normal based on a Timer. Why bother with Pressure. I see no real glam here at all.
 
Last edited:
Big Deal !! Not.

This has got to be a gimmick and more annoying than anything else. And no I am not an iPhone / Apple basher, I have one and also a Samsung.

The same type of thing can be achieved by just sitting on a location for a longer time than normal based on a Timer. Why bother with Pressure. I see no real glam here at all.
Well, now you won't have to hold and wait a moment? I'd say it's an improvement. It's not an earth shattering, reality changing feature, but no one has said it was intended to be. It's just one of many little things to improve the iPhone 6 model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueParadox
I will preorder this on the 12th, but it will be returned if it's confirmed that it's only got 1GB Ram.

Actually I'll immediately be able to discern this by myself. If it behaves like my Air 2, and I can have four or five resource heavy websites and a few apps running without refreshes then I'll be mega happy. If on the other hand it behaves like my iPhone 6 (which was returned for this very reason) then it is going back.
 
Glad to see Apple squeezed in the optical stabilization feature into the smaller iPhone 6S. As a heavy photo and video user, that's gonna be the killer feature for me. #ByeBlurryPics

Where do you see this?

image.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.