Thick, thin - who cares! Does no one else find it interesting that iPhone mobile providers are being announced in numerous territories world wide that previously did not have legal iPhone markets.
June 9th will not only see the release of the next gen 3G iPhone, but I'm guessing it will be followed with a world wide roll out from all the mobile providers. This will be the global launch of the iPhone!
I just hope apple has manufactured enough units, 'cus demand is going to be epic.
I wonder how many will be available at launch [whenever that is]. We're talking about a buttload of iphones that are going to be released all over the world.
I wouldn't be surprised if Apple elitists start forming lines at Apple stores before June 9 just to be safe.
Would it seem that AT&T offers a $200 subsidy only if the iPhone were to be unlocked or available from other carriers? If the iPhone can only be used at AT&T, and is subsidized, then the retail price is meaningless, and the iPhone is instantly "devalued" to the subsidy price. I mean, why pay, let's say $399 or $499 retail, for a phone that can't be used anywhere? If discounting of an Apple product, in this case, every Apple iPhone sold in the U.S., were to happen, the biggest news on June 9 won't be the iPhone, it will be that the existing branding and marketing strategy of Apple -- that of never discounting products below the established retail price -- has been forever altered.
An AT&T subsidized iphone would encourage an AT&T subscription. Yes, it could still be unlocked, but why spend $500 and use it on T-Mobile if you can save $200 and go with AT&T?
Also, let's go back to the two bridges poster for WWDC. More and more I'm feeling like it could represent the two iPhone models.