garethslee said:[/IMG]![]()
hah! brilliant
i doubt we're going to see anything for a while yet.
Feb 8th is a bad bad day... my girlfriends birthday is on the 7th so ill be flat broke after that
garethslee said:[/IMG]![]()
jeffbax said:All I want is that Dual Core G4 and all its lovely on chip memory controller goodness, and higher res screens, inside a widescreen 13" PB![]()
Ysean said:Well, that's 3 tuesdays from today.
rosalindavenue said:Hey hey hey-- that's only TWO Tuesdays from today. And I don't know why I'm so on pins and needles about this-- I dont think I'm going to buy until Tiger comes out anyway--![]()
RichP said:Based on the cinema display and mac mini white+aluminum design trends, I would imagine the 5th generation to look something like this (my pshop skills arent that great, lol):
![]()
I don't see them totally dropping the white trend, the general size of the unit, or anything too revolutionary, just evolution on the ipod design. I certainly hope a thinner, color, high capacity version presents itself; the only thing keeping me from a 40GB, especially the Photo, is the thickness of the unit.
neoelectronaut said:I don't guess the 20GB would be phased out and the 40GB would be dropped to $300, eh? lol, one can wish anyway.
This sucks. I was so looking forward to getting a 40GB iPod, my first, in the next 2-3 months. Now they're gonna release some new model that I'll end up not liking, or jack up the price...great. I like the 4G iPod as it is, and I'm worried that whenever I finally get the chance to get an iPod, it'll be the 5G...but I wanted a 4G. *sigh*
SiliconAddict said:QCassidy352 said:I'm just curious what you do with your laptop that you consider a 1.67 Ghz G4 to have "nonexistent performance." .
Virtual PC.
SiliconAddict said:Unless you have a secret edition of MS Office for the Mac that comes with Access, its going to be a requirement on any Apple laptop I have. And please people. Don't tell me to just get a cheap PC laptop. I do NOT want to carry two systems with me where ever I go. Beyond that I have over a grand in software invested on the PC side of things. Too much to simply give it up cold turkey. That and some of it is unique to Windows. MS MapPoint does not have a counterpart on OS X nor does, as far as I know, Visio.
Originally Posted by raggedjimmi
umm... i think i found something out
whilst dropping off to sleep last night i was thinking of the apple hardware page layout (as you do) and i realised something
~Shard~ said:Let's just say that I'm glad you went to sleep when you did, as your mind was obviously playing tricks on you.How the heck do you make an "N" out of that mess?! Nice try, but in this case, no...
![]()
SiliconAddict said:Virtual PC. Unless you have a secret edition of MS Office for the Mac that comes with Access, its going to be a requirement on any Apple laptop I have. And please people. Don't tell me to just get a cheap PC laptop. I do NOT want to carry two systems with me where ever I go... ...It doesnt have to be lightening fast but sure as heck faster then the 1.25Ghz system I tried MapPoint on at an Apple store last year...
Caiwyn said:And you want a G5? What are you, a masochist?
Get a PC. Seriously, it sounds like all the software you need in order to be productive is PC software that has no OS X equivalent.I have a PC. In point of fact I have 5 PC's. 2 laptops. 2 desktops. And a home server. As an admin of just under two hundred PCs where I work I deal with Windows BS day in and day out. I do not want to come home and deal with the same ****. As I said before I'm not going to carry around two freaking laptops with me. And I need these apps to come along with me to work.
Why are you even using a Mac? For its UNIX command line? Just install Cygwin on a PC laptop and be done with it. For the stability and ease-of-use? That's shot to hell the minute you start Windows via VPC.
What the heck are you talking about? Windows is just as stable on the PPC platform as on the X86. Just slower. Hell Im using VPC on my Dell at work to setup installer packages and it runs perfectly fine.
And FYI I'm not using a Mac. I want to use a Mac, and I will before the end of the year. Probably before midyear. I'm sick of Windows BS. I can give you a 5 page essay in my experiences with windows over the last few years being in the IT industry. The short version is while stability is there security is not. Every damn time you install a freaking patch you have to worry whether or not its going to trash your system. No more then 6 weeks ago I ended up rebuilding the desktop Im typing this on because a patch that I installed screwed up the OS enough that every time I tried logging into Windows it immediately kick me back to the login screen. I spent about 4 hours trying to fix that problem. No luck.
Then there is the inability to get Microsoft and their various OEMs to get a seamless integration between hardware and software. In my years I've yet to see a sleep mode on a Windows system that after a while doesnt get FUBARed after a while. Ive got an IBM laptop sitting here that takes about 2 minutes to resume and its a brand new system that my company gave me. No errors in the error log. Ive done all the basic troubleshooting it simply doesnt work right anymore.
And then there is the additional software you really need to purchase when dealing with Windows. Antivirus software, a good firewall (Windows Firewall sucks as does most of the free stuff like the free version of Zone Alarm.), a good adware scanner (SpyBot and Adaware do NOT detect everything. And then you have the wonderful subscriptions to get those virus def updates. The entire industry is built up to fix inherent problems in Windows. Im sick of feeding that industry. Period.
As for *nix. Cygwin is hardly a good implementation of *nix. In fact it down right SUCKS.
The bulk of my needs doesnt require Windows. I know of very few people who have large amounts of Windows software that are going to give it up cold turkey. And Im not going to be doing heavy lifting in Access. Mainly tweaking tables, running a few reports. Fixing corrupt Dbases and the like. Light stuff.I love the modern Mac platform as much as anybody else here, but if the bulk of my needs could only be served by Windows, then that would be what I used.
It boils down to this. Apples current Pro mobile solution sucks for those who are using CPU intensive apps like VPC, FCP, Photoshop, etc. Year over year its something like a 5% increase in speed. That isnt growth that is stagnation. Couple that with an aging architecture, a aging video card, a rather pathetic screen in comparison to current systems it all adds up to a system that has been down right neglected. And telling me I should be getting a PC simply because Apple cant deliver the goods is another BS excuse. Stop making excuses for them.
Ysean said:Welp kids, I went ahead and ordered a low-end 15" powerbook. I figure when I major update happens I can just give this one to the gf and order a new one.
Anyway, as of right now, estimated shipping date is "On or before
02/08/2005." Well, that's 3 tuesdays from today. So, I have a nasty feeling the little update that everyone is expecting won't come until the 1st or 8th of February.
I just hope they hurry up and update and ship. I'm going on a 2 week vacation and will have work that needs to be done while I'm away. There's no way I'll attempt to deal with my old "laptop" again.
SiliconAddict said:No I want something which can actually compete against a Pentium M. As it stands the PowerBook line sucks. Ive seen VPC on a 1.8Ghz G5. It IS faster then on a G4.
SiliconAddict said:What the heck are you talking about? Windows is just as stable on the PPC platform as on the X86. Just slower.
SiliconAddict said:I'm sick of Windows BS. I can give you a 5 page essay in my experiences with windows over the last few years being in the IT industry. The short version is while stability is there security is not. Every damn time you install a freaking patch you have to worry whether or not its going to trash your system... Then there is the inability to get Microsoft and their various OEMs to get a seamless integration between hardware and software... And then there is the additional software you really need to purchase when dealing with Windows.
SiliconAddict said:The bulk of my needs doesnt require Windows. I know of very few people who have large amounts of Windows software that are going to give it up cold turkey. And Im not going to be doing heavy lifting in Access. Mainly tweaking tables, running a few reports. Fixing corrupt Dbases and the like. Light stuff.
SiliconAddict said:It boils down to this. Apples current Pro mobile solution sucks for those who are using CPU intensive apps like VPC, FCP, Photoshop, etc.
SiliconAddict said:Year over year its something like a 5% increase in speed. That isnt growth that is stagnation.
SiliconAddict said:Couple that with an aging architecture,
SiliconAddict said:a aging video card,
SiliconAddict said:a rather pathetic screen in comparison to current systems
SiliconAddict said:it all adds up to a system that has been down right neglected. And telling me I should be getting a PC simply because Apple cant deliver the goods is another BS excuse. Stop making excuses for them.
JohnK.O said:I dont really see how the 4th gen. design could really be significantly improved for the 5th gen. other than a colour screen.
Caiwyn said:But nowhere near as stable. Surely you've read about all the problems MS has had porting VPC to the G5.
My comparison was between Windows and OS X, not Windows on the x86 vs. Windows on the PowerPC via VPC. You're making my point for me. If the superior stability of OS X is not a factor, then what is?
I hear you. Those are my reasons for switching as well. What you described all boils down to the superiority of the Macintosh's hardware and software design. But the best design in the world doesn't mean squat if it doesn't get the work done, and you either require, or refuse to relinquish, functionality that only comes with Windows. What good is making the case for switching to a Mac if you can't live without a fast-performing Windows implementation? Because when it's all said and done and you're loading up VPC, guess what? YOU'RE STILL RUNNING WINDOWS.
Then why are you wasting so much air bitching about the fact that VPC doesn't run like a cheetah?
Are you serious? You just listed a complete system emulator, a high-end video editing suite, and the top-of-the-line photographic image editor. EVERYONE'S pro mobile solution sucks for those apps, in comparison to a desktop system. Unless you buy a 2" thick laptop that weighs 15 pounds and sounds like a jet engine.
And yet, every one of those apps will run, and run well, on the current G4 Powerbook. I, too, am a sysadmin. But *my* creative department has no problem running the complete Adobe Creative Suite, as well as Quark XPress and Microsoft Office, on the current crop of Powerbook G4s.
Frankly, if the blazing speed of a desktop is what you need, then you need to buy a desktop. If you require the mobility of a laptop, then you need to learn how to compromise, no matter what platform you're running. The G4 is not so behind the G5's capabilities that it doesn't deliver every bit as much as Intel's mobile solution does against an Intel desktop.
So "growth," by your definition, would be a 5% increase in speed that had a 5 after the G instead of a 4?
Compared to what? The Pentium M/Centrino? Which is based on the Pentium 3 and represents a step BACKWARDS in chip evolution?
Less than a year old is "aging?" I'd hate to see your girlfriend.
Yeah, because that 1280x854 widescreen resolution on Apple's 15" Powerbook doesn't even come close to the stock 1024x768 on most other laptops.
Stop being a whiny bitch. When the technology exists, Apple will have it. Me, I'm putting my money where my mouth is. I'll be buying a 15" Powerbook no matter what the next rev is.
Caiwyn said:But nowhere near as stable. Surely you've read about all the problems MS has had porting VPC to the G5.
My comparison was between Windows and OS X, not Windows on the x86 vs. Windows on the PowerPC via VPC. You're making my point for me. If the superior stability of OS X is not a factor, then what is?
I hear you. Those are my reasons for switching as well. What you described all boils down to the superiority of the Macintosh's hardware and software design. But the best design in the world doesn't mean squat if it doesn't get the work done, and you either require, or refuse to relinquish, functionality that only comes with Windows. What good is making the case for switching to a Mac if you can't live without a fast-performing Windows implementation? Because when it's all said and done and you're loading up VPC, guess what? YOU'RE STILL RUNNING WINDOWS.
Then why are you wasting so much air bitching about the fact that VPC doesn't run like a cheetah?
Are you serious? You just listed a complete system emulator, a high-end video editing suite, and the top-of-the-line photographic image editor. EVERYONE'S pro mobile solution sucks for those apps, in comparison to a desktop system. Unless you buy a 2" thick laptop that weighs 15 pounds and sounds like a jet engine.
And yet, every one of those apps will run, and run well, on the current G4 Powerbook. I, too, am a sysadmin. But *my* creative department has no problem running the complete Adobe Creative Suite, as well as Quark XPress and Microsoft Office, on the current crop of Powerbook G4s.
Frankly, if the blazing speed of a desktop is what you need, then you need to buy a desktop. If you require the mobility of a laptop, then you need to learn how to compromise, no matter what platform you're running. The G4 is not so behind the G5's capabilities that it doesn't deliver every bit as much as Intel's mobile solution does against an Intel desktop.
So "growth," by your definition, would be a 5% increase in speed that had a 5 after the G instead of a 4?
Compared to what? The Pentium M/Centrino? Which is based on the Pentium 3 and represents a step BACKWARDS in chip evolution?
Less than a year old is "aging?" I'd hate to see your girlfriend.
Yeah, because that 1280x854 widescreen resolution on Apple's 15" Powerbook doesn't even come close to the stock 1024x768 on most other laptops.
Stop being a whiny bitch. When the technology exists, Apple will have it. Me, I'm putting my money where my mouth is. I'll be buying a 15" Powerbook no matter what the next rev is.
SiliconAddict said:It boils down to this. Apples current Pro mobile solution sucks for those who are using CPU intensive apps like VPC, FCP, Photoshop, etc. Year over year its something like a 5% increase in speed. That isnt growth that is stagnation. Couple that with an aging architecture, a aging video card, a rather pathetic screen in comparison to current systems it all adds up to a system that has been down right neglected. And telling me I should be getting a PC simply because Apple cant deliver the goods is another BS excuse. Stop making excuses for them.
ts1973 said:I think Apple is toying a little with us.
Yesterday, delivery of Powerbooks was 3-5 days, today 7-10 days. I guess they just put back the update another week (can't imagine people massively started buying powerbooks yesterday).
blybug said:I also just noticed that if you add the numerical values of the letters in APPLE together
A1 + P16 + P16 + L12 + E5 = 50
and divide by the number of letters in "Steven Jobs" (10)
50 / 10 = 5
QUOTE]
Steve Jobs turns 50 February 24!![]()