With pod capacities getting so large, how long until they play video files?
Maybe its a hidden feature in this new generation?
Maybe its a hidden feature in this new generation?
SiliconAddict said:True. But we are obviously limited by the technology on hand. If Apple HAS these drives available to them and are holding out on us because Steve is pissed. That, IMHO, isn't a business decision. That is a personal grudge and a possible earmark of someone who isn't totally stable. Steve wants to be pissed. That's fine. You don't possibly screw over the company you are leading because of it.
ccuilla said:There is likely (at least one) a rational explanation for no 60GB iPod right now.
~Shard~ said:Yah, but then by that rationale, I would need a 200+ GB iPod to have all my music "on hand"...
I of course realize people use their iPods for different things and have different philosophies about them, but for me, I just need enough music on my iPod to last me through the day, or on a long flight/drive, etc.
matthewwithanm said:How could anybody need more than forty gigs for music? If they don't want it to be compressed, that's how.
matthewwithanm said:How could anybody need more than forty gigs for music? If they don't want it to be compressed, that's how.
ArticulatedArm said:
Not gonna happen. Apple Computer just lost a trademark dispute in China to these peoplegreenmonsterman said:actually iMac backwards is caMi
maybe apple will start making girls clothing.
dontmatter said:good lord, I hope you're keeping that music in dvd-audio or something. do you even know what is good and what is crap?
More than that, I'd assume you would know, with all of that music, that it isn't about having enough to get you through the day, but having enought to having enough to listen to whatever strikes your fancy, whenever it strikes your fancy.
matthewwithanm said:How could anybody need more than forty gigs for music? If they don't want it to be compressed, that's how.
uberman42 said:I was at the Sony Store in Ginza Japan a few weeks back...was not impressed with the U50 - the screen is too small, the back of the unit was too hot (hot as a Gen1 Albook with the HD continuously spinning), and it was very unintuitive with XP as it's OS (Might as well have been a Vaio). There are some kinks to work out with the design and build quality, but it is good to see that Sony is trying...
These are not the driods I'm looking for.bonk said:these are not the droids you're looking for
Yep, Sony has a bad habbit of going proprietary. Sony has some very cool devices, then they hamper them with proprietary standards. Stupid IMHO.flipperfeet said:I have to respectfully disagree with you on this. I really do not think Sony IS trying, they certainly have not demonstrated it anywhere else. They have repeated the same mistake over and over, that mistake being proprietary formats in which they end up going it alone. Even their VIAO operating systems are a unique flavor of Windows that make them problematic, their WiFi network drive even used a unique flavor of Linux. This chronic problem even stops Sony equipment from playing nicely with Sony equipment. They can not even seem to settle on a compatible memory card technology for their devices.
The Sony player is not bad looking, the interface interesting, but the data format ensures it is DOA.
ccuilla said:This is stupid. Apple is not doing what you have suggested. Get over it. Steve is not doing this. There is likely (at least one) a rational explanation for no 60GB iPod right now.
X_Ranger said:Currently, I have 41+ GB of music. Most of it Jazz and most of it digitized from LPs. I collected over 1500 LPs and 600 CDs over a period of 20+ years.
Some of the music is very special to me as this music saw me through many phases of my life. Also, some of the albums are very rare.
Playing my music in random mode is a delight in discovering tracks I haven't heard in a while. And then there are tracks that reminds me of special times, special places, and special people.
Yes, I need this music; and yes, I need that 60 GIG iPod.
SiliconAddict said:If there is a rational explanation I would love to here it.
egor said:I've just got one problem with people who have a need for 60g ipods.
I UNDERSTAND there are people out there that have massive music libraries. I understand that you want it to be high quality stuff (not 128kb/s ****). And I realise you don't really want smart playlists or more than one pod cos you want it all on one device, its much cooler.
But just one thing. How the hell do you manage to accumulate so much music? Do you just have bad taste? I mean, ****, I couldn't find 20gb of music I like, and my tastes are rather eclectic. There simply is just too much crap out there and not enough good stuff for me to fathom how this could be so. Now, I understand we all have different tastes, for instance, whoever is reading this might consider my stuff crap, and their's good, but then their idea of quality will be parallel to mine, surely? As in, there is alot of crap around (and they'd consider the stuff I like a part of that).
Well, anyway, if someone can explain this to me, it'd be much appreciated...
SiliconAddict said:Then why is it that ATI got burned when they announced an Apple product? Why is it that everyone gets nervous whenever someone lets some info slip that may pertain to Apple's release plans?
For any other company its stupid. The company comes first. For Apple its the result of the control of a company by one man who has a fuse.
If there is a rational explanation I would love to here it. The only two possibilities I can see is a video type ipod being created for the high-end iPod that will be released later. Or manufacturing issues on the drive. The latter seems unlikely since Tosh was the one to announce the drives and the fact that Apple has ordered said drives. Would they make such a high key statement if they were having production issues? I mean that leaves the ball in Apple's court to say Oops sorry. Tosh is having problems and can't get their **** together. No something else is going on. I still think Apple and Jobs are trying to make Tosh sweat over this. Maybe I'm wrong. But the personality of Jobs makes me think I'm right.
SiliconAddict said:True. But we are obviously limited by the technology on hand. If Apple HAS these drives available to them and are holding out on us because Steve is pissed. That, IMHO, isn't a business decision. That is a personal grudge and a possible earmark of someone who isn't totally stable. Steve wants to be pissed. That's fine. You don't possibly screw over the company you are leading because of it.
What I can picture appearing is a sleeve that attaches to an iPod much in the same way accessories are added to HP iPaqs. It would plug into the dock connector, contain its own battery, and send the iPod's digital output through an on-board Apple Lossless encoder and out to WiFi. The extra bulk would be okay here (and there wouldn't be much, WiFi already fits into PC Cards with room to spare), this accessory wouldn't be very useful outside the home. If done right, it could support all of 3G, mini and 4G. A firmware modification to support selecting a zeroconf target from the iPod's menu would be needed, but everything else the iPod needs is already there.gadg said:And at the top of the list .... is the Airport Express. Hmm, could that be a sign of Airport/Airtunes support on the new iPod?