p.s. Also, getting a Mac guarantees you a fast relatively new computer
Relatively. And looking at the last years... new and fast isn't exactly a Mac strength.
p.s. Also, getting a Mac guarantees you a fast relatively new computer
I never understood why Mac platform was/is not used in the business enviroments since way back in the 90s. Whenever I ask people who work in business they usually say they use software that is availible for both platforms and pretty common software like Office, accounting software, adobe and the like...etc.
If you're using Windows-only software, of course it wouldn't make sense to use the Mac. Not all corps are like that, and the number that are is shrinking.It's my observation people are no more productive in the enterprise with a Mac. In fact it's the opposite. I can't tell you how many times I've waited on a conference call while a Mac user has to restart their virtual machine so they can present. All too often I see people having to work around Mac limitations which exist because it's a PC world. They seem to be oblivious to the extra work they're having to do to work within a PC ecosystem.
IMO many choose a Mac based on fashion / form more than functionality.
I used to work at place where they give you Lenovo laptop and there’s no other options. After deleting Windows, installing Ubuntu and working for 2 month I gave up and started to bring my MacBook Air from home. I managed to spend their more than a year until they noticed and I had to quit.
Enterprise is so tricky, they always try to lock stuff down and add friction everything. More freedom I have, more productive I am.
This. I have been out of the enterprise business for a few years but these figures surprise me. The reason is simple at least when i was still there. All the enterprise apps were built around a windows platform often requiring features in IE. I cannot believe it would have changed that much in a few years.
Yeah...I'm really just not convinced macOS offers much more than Photo syncing and Messages these days.
Not at the companies I've worked for. Maybe if you work in finance they dictate using windows machines but for media Mac is the goto.Usually only mom and pop shops allow you to choose but large enterprises are predominately Windows and Linux in most major industries. Occasionally, software development or media departments might be more Mac focused.
Usually only mom and pop shops allow you to choose but large enterprises are predominately Windows and Linux in most major industries. Occasionally, software development or media departments might be more Mac focused.
The point being the company I worked for had Mac users claiming they were more productive yet they had to juggle two operating systems because there were some programs that they had to run which had no OS X equivalent. They had the hassle of managing two operating systems, one of which is the OS they were trying to avoid. Time after time I saw these people claim to be more productive yet the overhead of managing multiple operating systems demonstrated otherwise. Yet, despite this, they continued to believe they were being more productive.If you're using Windows-only software, of course it wouldn't make sense to use the Mac. Not all corps are like that, and the number that are is shrinking.
I was given the choice of an iPhone 8 or a Samsung S9. Went with the sammy.
Don’t blame fundamental Windows problems on people.Yeah, but people who are not tech savvy screw things up fast. You give people an inch, and their PCs are filled with viruses. I have to Control Access on nearly all of our PCs at work.
Among enterprise organizations that allow employees to choose their equipment of choice, Apple is becoming an increasingly popular choice, according to new survey information shared this morning by Apple IT management platform Jamf.
52 percent of enterprise organizations let employees choose their computers, while 49 percent let employees choose their mobile devices.
![]()
Of those organizations, 72 percent of employees included in Jamf's survey chose Mac, while 28 percent chose PC. As for mobile devices, 75 percent of respondents chose an iPhone or an iPad, while just 25 percent opted for an Android device.
![]()
According to employees, the ability to choose their operating systems and devices of choice makes them more productive. 68 percent said choice improves productivity, and 77 percent said they're more likely to stay with a company that offers device choice.Jamf's survey was conducted in March of 2018 and includes responses from 580 executives, managers, and IT professionals from organizations around the world.
Article Link: 72% of Enterprise Employees Choose Macs Over PCs, 75% Pick iOS Devices Over Android
What fundamental Windows problems are you referring to?Don’t blame fundamental Windows problems on people.
You forgot to add this to your comment: 'Nuff said!As has already been said, it was a poorly conducted survey. Also despite the lack of reference to the actual study, it was performed by JAMF, a company that sells enterprise device management solutions for Macs and iOS devices. A little biased considering all they published was a couple of conclusions. If they asked their own customers, there's already a huge selection bias that invalidates the study. From the final paragraph, it sounds like they asked their own contacts at their own customers. Let's see a link to how they explain their result?
It would be like take a poll on MacRumors "do you prefer iOS to Android" and when 90+% of responses are in favour iOS concluding that 90+% of the world population prefers iOS.
All that being said, the conclusion is still limited to "people who aren't paying for their computers and want the computers to be as expensive as possible for their employers as a sign of prestige want Apple products". It makes as much sense as asking people if they want their all expenses paid company car to be a Honda Fit or a Ferrari. That result would mean nothing in the real world, just like this survey means nothing in the real world.
His signature says "2015 13" MBP, iPhone 6s, OnePlus 3, Apple TV, iPad Pro 10.5"Yet you still post on this forum.
If you didn't have Windows-only software, the Mac would be more productive for various smaller reasons. Generally less non-work stuff you have to do to make it usable, especially if you need security (which everyone does).The point being the company I worked for had Mac users claiming they were more productive yet they had to juggle two operating systems because there were some programs that they had to run which had no OS X equivalent. They had the hassle of managing two operating systems, one of which is the OS they were trying to avoid. Time after time I saw these people claim to be more productive yet the overhead of managing multiple operating systems demonstrated otherwise. Yet, despite this, they continued to believe they were being more productive.
At my new company I had the opportunity to choose a Mac and I passed on it. Why? Because the tools I need are Windows only. Yes, I could run them in a VM / Docker environment on macOS. But why bother with that hassle. Every morning I log on to my PC and do my work. I cannot see how using a Mac would make me any more productive.
Nobody uses Windows in the tech industry unless it's something platform-specific like gaming. It's all Mac and Linux for personal machines, mostly Mac.Usually only mom and pop shops allow you to choose but large enterprises are predominately Windows and Linux in most major industries. Occasionally, software development or media departments might be more Mac focused.
This is a completely different discussion.If you didn't have Windows-only software, the Mac would be more productive for various smaller reasons. Generally less non-work stuff you have to do to make it usable, especially if you need security (which everyone does).
As has already been said, it was a poorly conducted survey. Also despite the lack of reference to the actual study, it was performed by JAMF, a company that sells enterprise device management solutions for Macs and iOS devices. A little biased considering all they published was a couple of conclusions. If they asked their own customers, there's already a huge selection bias that invalidates the study. From the final paragraph, it sounds like they asked their own contacts at their own customers. Let's see a link to how they explain their result?
It would be like take a poll on MacRumors "do you prefer iOS to Android" and when 90+% of responses are in favour iOS concluding that 90+% of the world population prefers iOS.
All that being said, the conclusion is still limited to "people who aren't paying for their computers and want the computers to be as expensive as possible for their employers as a sign of prestige want Apple products". It makes as much sense as asking people if they want their all expenses paid company car to be a Honda Fit or a Ferrari. That result would mean nothing in the real world, just like this survey means nothing in the real world.
The reality is the company I am referring to did have Windows only software for which Mac users needed to run. Therefore they had to use Windows in some fashion (Bootcamp, virtualization, etc) in order to perform their job. Despite this they claimed they were being more productive.