Don't think this bodes well for future sales of iPad if the majority are repeat buyers. Apple needs new buyers to make this product cycle a success.
Note that this is only early purchasers-- the people that buy on day 1.
Don't think this bodes well for future sales of iPad if the majority are repeat buyers. Apple needs new buyers to make this product cycle a success.
In other words, the very very early adopters are more likely to be fanboys, who buy everything Apple makes and thus already had iPads.
This isn't new, but it's nice to have proof.
A fanboy isn't someone who buys every new product a company buys. And that's why the world is so messed up.
People don't know the difference between those things.
Lets just take a step back here because I tell ya; I'm a full blown Apple fanboi but even I'm not drinking the coolAid this time around!
We all know about touchID, we all know it fits perfectly in the home button, has support in the A7 on board die. There is ABSOLUTLEY NO REASON this could not have been incorporated in the air this time around.
I know everyone says it, and frankly I'm tired of hearing it but in this case i truly beleive if Steve had been around he would have insisted that the next version of the iPad would have had touchID alongside the 5s.
Apple, you can stuff your iPad air sales until you predictably release the NEXT version like you should have this time around with TouchID included!
I'm afraid this stinks of 'dragging things out' and I absolutley hate to say it but after 15 years of Apple ownership I'm afraid it's now impossible to ignore
"the rot is in! "
The suits and shareholders have taken overriding control and this ***** gonna get worse!
Why does everybody get a fanboy and a satisfied customer all mixed up? A fanboy isn't someone who buys every new product a company buys. And that's why the world is so messed up.
People don't know the difference between those things.
I love my iPad 2. But none of the iPads after it have been worthy enough for me to upgrade to.
Sure they'll make a quick buck selling toys. But everything is getting dumber. We are finally in viewing distance of Apple being no different than Sony (or any other tech company). Apple is quickly running out of things that distinguishes itself as a company. The question is no longer "when will apple get back on track?" but instead "who will take their place?"
Don't think this bodes well for future sales of iPad if the majority are repeat buyers. Apple needs new buyers to make this product cycle a success.
At some point, people have confused the word fanboy with satisfied customers.
With the iPad 2 still supported this year? I think Apple is gonna be going uphill on sales. ZLAST year, Apple underplayed the iPad "4" because they didn't want to splt their market from iPad 2 levels of performance. I think THIS year Apple is going to have to push high-performing games and other software for the A7 seroes devices that the older A5 series devices cannot run. They also should be getting out there in the accessories market (music making, toys, other devices) and push HARD for LIGHTENING capable upgrades rather than using Dock adapters...
It doesn't feel like Apple's pushing its ecosystem hard enough. thunderbolt devices arent seeing the market, lightening devices aren't being showcased by Apple... What are they doing to make more money??
----------
That's the BIGGEST problem when you are "king of the hill".. How to make the hill taller! On the last ten years Apple basically built its OWN HILL because Microsoft and all the PC makers wouldn't let it play... But now Apple's hill is the biggest around and how do you keep it going?
Microsoft has found itself the king of a hill nobody wants to climb anymore. They make metric crap tons of money, but nobody wants to COMPETE for their hill. I think Apple faces the same issue.., people gotta keep coming to your hill or somebody like Android is going to get a bigger hill just from idle traffic.
Arguably, a fanboy doesn't know the difference between those things. People more often than not fail to realize their own character flaws, and instead assume theirs is the proper and only path. And that, well, is why the world is so messed up.
In other words, the very very early adopters are more likely to be fanboys, who buy everything Apple makes and thus already had iPads.
This isn't new, but it's nice to have proof.
Note that this is only early purchasers-- the people that buy on day 1.
You remember well only the past doesn't compare well to the current iOS AppStore situation. Software used to have a monetary value, as did upgrades. That's over. I'm with you on the whole business planning argument but not sure how that relates to my original comment. My only point was that hardware upgrades are clearly good for Apple but not something developers immediately benefit from. Developers benefit from Apple devices becoming more widespread as new customers tend to spend more than existing ones. Would you agree to that?I wonder what happened back in the days of "computers", where I bought a new computer and put the same software on it? I must be remembering that wrong... I probably just re-purchased the software.
Maybe back then there wasn't any software... ?
That must be it.
Developers have direct access to a wider audience of users than EVER before in computing history. Before embarking on a development endeavor for the purpose of making money, you should understand your potential audience, projected sales, and plan for monetizing future releases (Office, anyone)? Developers did just fine on the Mac platform when Apple was selling a couple hundred thousand units a quarter and all they could do was advertise in magazines.
To think that this will have any impact on a developer in the iOS space is silly.
If a retina display isn't enough to make you consider upgrading, you'll likely be rocking that iPad 2 forever. In a device like a tablet where the display is 90% of the experience, I can't imagine what else you would want Apple to focus on.
Whilst one plausible way of looking at it is (neglecting the tiny sample size) that the market's becoming saturated, I'd offer that this revision is one of the more compelling ones. I liked the iPad 3, with that magnificent display, but didn't feel compelled to migrate at that time.
Similarly, the iPad 4 was a nice bump, but still, my iPad 1 worked fine.
Here, though, I saw an iPad that was evidently the future baseline - 64-bit architecture's where the next round of devices to be dropped will be found - and one third lighter. Add in the overall CPU throughput, GPU improvements, and returning to current iOS offerings - it wasn't a difficult sell. ^_^
So, another factor might well be that this revision finally lures out the reluctant upgraders.
I know everyone says it, and frankly I'm tired of hearing it but in this case i truly beleive if Steve had been around he would have insisted that the next version of the iPad would have had touchID alongside the 5s.
Don't think this bodes well for future sales of iPad if the majority are repeat buyers. Apple needs new buyers to make this product cycle a success.