Why didnt you get that phone?
There was no MotoG when I bought the iPhone 5
Why didnt you get that phone?
I would even pay more if I have to.
When I say subsidised I mean signing a new contract and paying $199 or whatever not the Next or Edge financing program. There is no additional built in cost to my service contract just signing a new contract.
That $60/month single-line plan is the exception rather than the norm and it's a limited time offer, too. That said, it really is a great deal for those with single lines and upgrade phones every 1-2 years.I left a contract 2 years ago, bought my phone outright, and moved to Straight Talk at $45 a month. This time around I signed a Verizon contract for $60 a month. Why? Because the cost over 2 years was almost identical to Straight Talk factoring in initial cash outlay. Therefore, with Verizon, I have an extra $450 to invest right now instead of spending it on a phone. The time value of that money makes signing a contract a smarter option.
Yes. This is exactly why I disliked the subsidy model.Depends on who you sign with. If you're paying $199 for the phone, odds are you are likely paying $30-$40 a month for a data plan. The extra cost for your phone is built into those payments for the duration of your two year contract. And under that model (with AT&T and Verizon) you continue to pay that higher monthly service rate even when the plan is paid off or when you BYOD. (That was truly a ripoff.....)
Exactly. The subsidy model greatly accelerated smartphone adoption in the US.The subsidized pricing model was genius though. It got people into smartphones buying habits they never would have done if they paid for the device upfront like the rest of the world. If you asked 5 years ago how many customers would pay $650-$850 for a device that depreciates by 80% in 3 years and would do it every 1-2 years....you'd never have guessed tens of millions.
The real problem is that most people don't truly understand the real cost of the phones. People don't realize that the phones really do cost $650 starting out brand new. All they see is $199 and think that's what the cost is.I have to admit that I am starting to realize how ridiculous the price point is. I mean for just $65 more I could buy a new Macbook Air! It's not about not being able to afford it but more about the intrinsic value. I'm on the verge of cancelling my order. Anyone else feel this way? I'm not looking for immature moronic comments (Mac Rumors specializes in those) but more intelligent discussion of what is the real value of the device.
$849 for the phone
$67 in taxes
$18 for a case off Amazon.
I have never spent this much money on a phone before. When the first iPhone came out I purchased it used off Craigslist for about $450 a few days after it came out and that was a bit pricey in 07. The phone was not subsidized then. Since then I have always paid subsidized prices. All my iPhone's through the 4s, my S3 and current S4 were all under $200. Maybe I'm just used to this price. A bit on the fence here. How do you all feel about paying full price for the 6+? I know there are cheaper options but those would feel like a downgrade to my current S4. Any thoughts?
When I say subsidised I mean signing a new contract and paying $199 or whatever not the Next or Edge financing program. There is no additional built in cost to my service contract just signing a new contract.
It's unfortunate that the device is saddled with the "phone" moniker: it's so much more than a phone. I see that I have a very powerful computer, communicator, and entertainment device in my pocket, and the price makes sense to me. They're way better than what I saw on Star Trek.![]()
When I say subsidised I mean signing a new contract and paying $199 or whatever not the Next or Edge financing program. There is no additional built in cost to my service contract just signing a new contract.
People always throw the "$1500 for a subsidized phone" phrase, but I don't understand why they include the service fee. The monthly bill is higher because I'm paying off the phone, but I would be paying for the core service to actually use the phone whether it is under contract or not.
Also, lets be real, most of the people buying it outright are buying on credit anyway. Same with Macs. I don't have the most the high end specs on my Apple devices, but at least I completely own them.
How do you all feel about paying full price for the 6+? I know there are cheaper options but those would feel like a downgrade to my current S4. Any thoughts?
No, but core service is significantly less expensive if you take out subsidy. For example, in my case, service+subsidy was $60/mo while service only is $40/mo. On the old plans, I was paying an extra $240 ever year regardless of whether I get a new device or not.People always throw the "$1500 for a subsidized phone" phrase, but I don't understand why they include the service fee. The monthly bill is higher because I'm paying off the phone, but I would be paying for the core service to actually use the phone whether it is under contract or not.
Less people would be buying $650+ smartphones, though, if they're actually made aware of the true cost. My mom has taught me to always pay my credit card balance in full every month so I never buy stuff on credit card that I'm unable to pay off.Also, lets be real, most of the people buying it outright are buying on credit anyway.
Admit it. You have a 6+ order with 3-4 week availability, right?No way i'd pay that for a phone, no way. I could almost buy two new pistols for that.
I'd cancel it at that price.
It's not a phone. It's a pocket computer that you can also make calls on. 1000 for a computer is nothing new.
they are just now starting to show the difference with the AT&T Value plan for example. Where they give you discounts for BYOD or if you buy on Next etc. Before, yes your statement was true as it was the same cost regardless if you paid it outright or not. Not the case anymore.....
Ahhhh you're one of the people that hates credit cards bc you weren't disciplined and got into trouble. thanks for clarifying!
No, but core service is significantly less expensive if you take out subsidy. For example, in my case, service+subsidy was $60/mo while service only is $40/mo. On the old plans, I was paying an extra $240 ever year regardless of whether I get a new device or not.
Less people would be buying $650+ smartphones, though, if they're actually made aware of the true cost. My mom has taught me to always pay my credit card balance in full every month so I never buy stuff on credit card that I'm unable to pay off.![]()
There are a couple of things, for me.
1. I want a new phone. (No, I don't ~need~ a new phone, but I want one.)
2. I am with a carrier that requires plan upgrades now with hardware upgrades, and that would necessitate an increase of $65 a month if I kept the same amount of data (6gb). (Yes, I'm in Canada). I'd spend more on contract if I got the phone at the 'discounted' $365 than I would if I buy it outright.
3. I anticipated this purchase and set aside the money for it.
That said, the iPhone 6S will have to blow me out of the water next year to get me to change, I think. I went from the 4 to the 5, then to the 5s and now to the 6, but I think this will keep me happy for a couple of years.
The things people judge and say on the internet?Well, my friend was offered the mobile share value plan, and he's on contract, so he's paying even less now.
Actually I'm 20 years old, a college student, and never owned a credit card. The things people judge and say on the internet. I don't hate credit cards, they can be useful in certain situations, plus I need to get one eventually to build credit. I also pay my own car payment. My point wasn't a nock at credit cards, it was that people come on here saying how much they save by buying outright, but most of them are paying on credit(and thus, interest) anyway.
I was also pointing out the fact, that just as less people would get an iPhone if they had to pay $650 outright(which I agree with), MUCH less people on here wouldn't have Macs either if they weren't paying on credit.
----------
Agree, which is why I upgrade every 2 years anyway. However, during those 2 years, it doesn't cost you $1500 for the phone itself. Again, you are paying extra those 2 years for the cost of the phone. You can't include the core service in the cost of the phone. With that said, yes, if you past the 2 year contract date and paying the same price, it's completely a rip off.
That's great, and I agree. My point wasn't a nock at credit cards, see my post above.