Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
VPN by Google One is designed to mask a user's IP address, preventing sites and apps from collecting that information for location tracking and monitoring activity across the web. It also offers protection from hackers and network operators, similar to any other VPN.
Do you trust your VPN provider more than your internet service provider?


In this process, your traffic is passing through a third party, the VPN company’s server. A VPN company may log all the traffic passing through their system, which essentially gives them a full picture of a user’s online browsing behavior. While most reputable VPNs do not spy on their users and have no incentive to do so, it can happen, and there are several examples of this happening.
 
Sigh… the comments here are so predictable. Thank you Macrumors for continuing to keep your users informed even when certain users just like to troll.

Having a VPN included in a service I’m already paying for is great. Wouldn’t use it all the time but while traveling this will be really useful. And yes, I have more trust in Google than some randos on the internet who think every competitor to Apple is the devil and only Apple can be trusted.
 
I love up in arms peoples about their data and how valuable it is. smh.
Laugh now. In the not so distant future, the self-serve terminal at the grocery store will refuse to sell you sweets and carb-laden foods because of your medical Body Mass Index, as reported to your bank (who will stop the transaction) by your Global Identity Profile.

See, practices like this are already the everyday norm in China, which disallows Google largely to replace it with their own data-gathering processes. You think some do-gooder, probably an appointee in a ministry or federal department, won't try to promote something like that "for the good of everyone?" Think again.

In a digital world, the one with the data is king. All else are peasants. Or subjects. Or servants.
 
The top reason I even think about using VPN is to try to hide away from Google and Facebook.. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
VPNs are good at hiding traffic from ISPs only. If your goal is to hide from Facebook and Google, VPNs are useless at preventing digital fingerprinting and other browser tracking. If you’re logged in, even those techniques won’t be needed to track you.
 
Funny? No. The correct words are "sad" and "predictable" while they continue to use Alphabet's services (gmail, youtube, google, maps, chrome, etc).
There are good alternatives to every one of those. Paid exchange, vimeo, duckduckgo, apple maps, safari or firefox, etc. Degoogling isn't hard.
 
Laugh now. In the not so distant future, the self-serve terminal at the grocery store will refuse to sell you sweets and carb-laden foods because of your medical Body Mass Index, as reported to your bank (who will stop the transaction) by your Global Identity Profile.

See, practices like this are already the everyday norm in China, which disallows Google largely to replace it with their own data-gathering processes. You think some do-gooder, probably an appointee in a ministry or federal department, won't try to promote something like that "for the good of everyone?" Think again.

In a digital world, the one with the data is king. All else are peasants. Or subjects. Or servants.
I just don't care... 95% peoples on this planet are slaves, myself included...
 
Degoogling…. Okay. Try de-ISPing or better yet de-governmenting. Lol. People live in a privacy fantasyland. It’s all good.

 
Last edited:
I just don't care... 95% peoples on this planet are slaves, myself included...
Most people are simply the product that Google markets to other 3rd parties. Been that way for years. Google is clever they increase the number of services offered to get even more information from you.
 
I'll just stick with OpenVPN. I use it to connect directly to the company's server from home. Sure it required a bit of tinkering to get just right, but I trust open source stuff. When millions of eyeballs have looked over the code and found no malicious exploits, I find it more trustworthy than any proprietary software.
 
I'll just stick with OpenVPN. I use it to connect directly to the company's server from home. Sure it required a bit of tinkering to get just right, but I trust open source stuff. When millions of eyeballs have looked over the code and found no malicious exploits, I find it more trustworthy than any proprietary software.

Google has open-sourced their VPN.

 
Ok, stupid question: how do I actually access this VPN? Looking on my account page and don't see anything.
 
Laugh now. In the not so distant future, the self-serve terminal at the grocery store will refuse to sell you sweets and carb-laden foods because of your medical Body Mass Index, as reported to your bank (who will stop the transaction) by your Global Identity Profile.

How would those two things (individual’s BMI and a bank/credit card account) necessarily be correctly connected together? Sometimes multiple people use the same computer/phone device and/or use the same bank/credit card.

Also, what motivation would a bank have to discourage use of their card? They want their customers spending as much as possible (without defaulting, of course) so they can collect transaction fees, potential interest, etc.
 
The iOS VPN implentation is so buggy that it routinely leaks real IP address information and is effectively bypassed even with VPN on. So those saying no VPN is better than Google VPN are possibly correct.

Certainly true if you want to keep your info away from Google then you shouldn't touch services like this with a barge pole.

If you already use Google services though, and they know a lot about you, Google VPN is a nice option to hide details from everyone else.

Google VPN is useless if you want to change your location to access streaming services in other countries. They tie you to an IP address in your own country. On the upside, most streaming services will allow you to stream content with Google VPN on as a result.
 
Every. Single. Thing. you list here is, in fact, used to gather, profile, disseminate, and sell user data en masse. Several of the things listed here were, in fact, specifically designed for such a mission. Google, from the date of its inception, has created and targeted that information exchange, all the while being smacked by legal entities around the world for their intrusive behavior, and all the while completely ignoring the penalties and orders to stop doing so in many ways.

No amount of shiny new things can distract from the absolute truth that Google's mission is, in fact, data control. How intrusive they are in your life depends on your level of tolerance (or ignorance) to how you hand over your data to them via casual use of their search engine or by allowing full data snooping via Chrome or Gmail.

As for Android... My youngest special-needs daughter will receive an Android phone for her birthday this month. Why Android? Because the parental software that can be installed on it has the ability to snoop almost every tap, type, and scroll on that device so we can help manage her usage and keep her safe. Android is sooo open to mining like that it makes it the best tool for a concerned parent. Apple's iOS is sooo tightly locked down that parenting software simply cannot snoop at a level that is as useful as the Android. Oh, the irony. If a parent can snoop that data, what is Google doing with your Android?
They purchased much of the technology to find new ways to mine data. It used to be give it away for free to sucker you in. Now they want you to pay to be exploited.
 
How would those two things (individual’s BMI and a bank/credit card account) necessarily be correctly connected together? Sometimes multiple people use the same computer/phone device and/or use the same bank/credit card.

Also, what motivation would a bank have to discourage use of their card? They want their customers spending as much as possible (without defaulting, of course) so they can collect transaction fees, potential interest, etc.
Exactly the point. Right now, there is legislation in the works to free banks from some of the onerous reporting duties that they have; specifically the Bank Secrecy Act in the United States requires financial institutions to report transactions over a certain amount ($10k) regardless of the source, etc. They are also required to report other "suspicious" transactions, all to help combat money laundering. Other institutions (PayPal, Venmo, etc) are newly required to report transactions and aggregates of $300 or more, to combat tax fraud. None of these institutions agree with the reporting, none want to do it, and all are being forced to act essentially as a law enforcement agency through that reporting requirement. They should not HAVE to be, but they ARE.

Make no mistake - data collection on individuals will absolutely be used as social currency in the future. It already is in China, across wide swaths of living and travel. If the federal government is providing your health care, let's say, then they will absolutely try to "incentivize" you to eat or drive or exercise properly. Perhaps your diabetic friend will be denied certain transactions for soda and sugary foods, or you and your high cholesterol will have to pay triple for eggs. Your electric car can be remotely managed so that your driving style is more agreeable. Vehicles already have some luxury or convenience features shut off or turned on only by subscription - who is to say that the driver's seat wouldn't be remotely contorted as to make your overweight body more uncomfortable as incentive to exercise (as an ad for 50% off the first year flashes on the dash screen as you drive by the gym). You can certainly be given a transaction quota per day/week/year or lifetime on certain products, such as ammunition. Going to a religious gathering that someone in the neighborhood has reported as "radical" or dangerous? You car can refuse to drive there (all vehicles sold in the US after 2026 are required to implement a remote kill switch for law enforcement). All of this, and much more, can easily be implemented this very afternoon if there were lawful requirements to do so.

Data gathering, especially if not anonymized, is radically dangerous to freedoms. I am no tinfoil hat wearing weirdo, just telling you what is possible, what is already being implemented, and how your daily freedoms and lifestyle will be slowly eroded into a shape and position that "someone else" will find more "agreeable" to society as a whole. All for the greater good, of course.
 
We even had to stop using Google Analytics and had to switch to a local based company and also a lot of website owners are currently being fined for implementing Google Fonts. It’s crazy out there

Yeah Google Fonts is one hell of a trojan. No one seems to know that :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: ratspg
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.