YesWill this help me use the TMo free mlb app so I can watch my local games?
YesWill this help me use the TMo free mlb app so I can watch my local games?
They purchased much of the technology to find new ways to mine data. It used to be give it away for free to sucker you in. Now they want you to pay to be exploited.
Ok, stupid question: how do I actually access this VPN? Looking on my account page and don't see anything.
Hi which plan is this? Can yu share the plan linkThat’s awesome!
I get my Google One through T-Mobile because T-Mobile offers a plan for $15/month that includes 2TB for Google Drive, etc. and unlimited photo and video back up with Google Photos
I’m glad that I’ll also now have VPN included in my Google One plan as well - having a VPN will be great for when I travel overseas
I would rather use “The Cone of Silence”.That smells like a negative to me. I mean centralising all your traffic through Google, the largest advertising and data collection company...
Not sure that Google press releases rank very high in terms of their trustworthiness.Google says it can't tie your network traffic to your identity.
The question is obviously whether this is true, but not necessarily more or less than with other companies.
They are a wholly owned subsidiary of the NSA. Someone like Eric Schmidt doesn’t go away. They go into hiding.VPN Access from Google. That's funny, tell another one.
It is the US gov and US companies that have a strangle hold on the internet and data collection, and with the US Gov sanctioning, banning, cancelling out any competitor, you're better off going with China.This is all about ideology and politics. I would no sooner buy a Google VPN than I would one from Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Netflix, Amazon, or even Twitter. Or one subsidized by the US Federal government. Or from China, for that matter.
It's getting so I might have to create my own VPN.
Exactly the point. Right now, there is legislation in the works to free banks from some of the onerous reporting duties that they have; specifically the Bank Secrecy Act in the United States requires financial institutions to report transactions over a certain amount ($10k) regardless of the source, etc. They are also required to report other "suspicious" transactions, all to help combat money laundering. Other institutions (PayPal, Venmo, etc) are newly required to report transactions and aggregates of $300 or more, to combat tax fraud. None of these institutions agree with the reporting, none want to do it, and all are being forced to act essentially as a law enforcement agency through that reporting requirement. They should not HAVE to be, but they ARE.
Make no mistake - data collection on individuals will absolutely be used as social currency in the future. It already is in China, across wide swaths of living and travel. If the federal government is providing your health care, let's say, then they will absolutely try to "incentivize" you to eat or drive or exercise properly. Perhaps your diabetic friend will be denied certain transactions for soda and sugary foods, or you and your high cholesterol will have to pay triple for eggs. Your electric car can be remotely managed so that your driving style is more agreeable. Vehicles already have some luxury or convenience features shut off or turned on only by subscription - who is to say that the driver's seat wouldn't be remotely contorted as to make your overweight body more uncomfortable as incentive to exercise (as an ad for 50% off the first year flashes on the dash screen as you drive by the gym). You can certainly be given a transaction quota per day/week/year or lifetime on certain products, such as ammunition. Going to a religious gathering that someone in the neighborhood has reported as "radical" or dangerous? You car can refuse to drive there (all vehicles sold in the US after 2026 are required to implement a remote kill switch for law enforcement). All of this, and much more, can easily be implemented this very afternoon if there were lawful requirements to do so.
Data gathering, especially if not anonymized, is radically dangerous to freedoms. I am no tinfoil hat wearing weirdo, just telling you what is possible, what is already being implemented, and how your daily freedoms and lifestyle will be slowly eroded into a shape and position that "someone else" will find more "agreeable" to society as a whole. All for the greater good, of course.
It’s the literal definition of that. Beelzebub opens a portal for you and is like “c’mon in, the water’s fine! Splish splash! Free presents inside!” Just wait until they spin it off into another LLC they 100% own due to “legitimate concerns about Google’s past.”Trust Google? 👁️ Na, I'll pass on that one. Just as well let the wolves run the hen house.
People hate on Google so much it's kind of funny. People know Google makes most of its money from data and ads already.
Let's forget all the work they did creating PageRank, Gmail in 2004 everybody begging for an invite, Google Maps (original Maps on iPhone for a while), YouTube acquisition and growth, I'm sure NOBODY uses YouTube, buying DoubleClick (which is why most people hate Google and their ad business), Chrome Browser.
Yes Android isn't as great as iOS, yes they create and destroy tons of products, Google Reeder, Google+ etc etc. They aren't some perfect amazing company.
Google Search helped the internet explode in use and popularity. No hate and punching on Google will ever change that.
Also Privacy and Internet in the same sentence are hilarious. It's okay, just put it all on Google![]()
Never was their code of conduct lol they were leading us on all along.That was when Google had "Do No Evil" as part of their code of conduct. It's no longer in the code of conduct lol.
Absolutely right.They are a wholly owned subsidiary of the NSA. Someone like Eric Schmidt doesn’t go away. They go into hiding.
When reading the page, the location of the footnote references said it all. I mean seriously, without reading any further, why would you need to qualify anything beginning with “Google will never…”? Lol.
“I will never cheat on you.”†
If I was drinking anything, I would have spat it out. I checked to see if it was April 1 three times after.
†🤰🏻: Except on days that end in y
View attachment 2170540
This from the company that has been sued multiple times for circumventing do not follow protocols on devices to gather data anyway.Google says it can't tie your network traffic to your identity.
The question is obviously whether this is true, but not necessarily more or less than with other companies.