Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
At least now the lighting charger cord can last longer with less use. Finally, Apple has joined the club.




You'll never know until you have experienced it. Been using wireless charging on Samsung phones for awhile now, and it's a great experience to just put the phone on a pad or stand up dock and take if off without the need to unplug anything.

The convenience is equivalent to keeping your car key fob in your pocket and using push to start. Not a big deal, until you actually get have it.
Genuine question (no really) are lightning cables that bad. I believe you and maybe I've just been lucky. If it's a problem I stand corrected.
 
I disagree. It's not a gimmick. Plugging in devices is one of life's tiny annoyances. Good riddance. Being able to just plop your device on a pad is quicker and more natural.
I don't want to 'have to' plop it on a pad.
I want to be able to use it any way I want while it charges.
 
Well I am all for wireless charging in the 10 years of iphone I've had more than 20 iPhone cables, tot they could just fix the cables I'll still be fine with that too
 
Bye bye ports.

A lot of posts so not sure if anyone brought it up yet but wireless charging on the iPhone possibly(probably)means the death of the lightning port.

While that is most certainly the goal, the big question is whether Apple will discontinue Lightning with this model, or give it a generation. Apple won't likely take away any ability to attach a physical cord to the device, so that means introducing something like the smart connector -- indeed maybe that's what we were seeing in the rumors from last year, where they were testing out the smart connector for future release. And if that's the route Apple goes, that means yet another adapter, this time from the smart connecter to Lightning, 3.5mm, etc. I'm imaging the dongle that anyone who is using wired headphones now would have to construct without replacing everything they already have. A SmartConnector to Lightning adapter, into which is inserted the Lightning to 3.5mm jack. Charging is taken care of wirelessly, unless there's no wireless charger available, in which case, they'll need a Lightning to USB charger, and the Belkin splitter if they want to use their wired headphones.

But that actually raises yet another question -- what EarPods does Apple ship with the new iPhone if they go with a Smart Connector? A pair with a SmartConnector plug? AirPods? Maybe that explains why the next iPhone is rumored to be so much more expensive? Or, will there be no way to get wired audio out of the iPhone without using an adapter? Meaning Apple will ship a SmartConnector to Lightning adapter, with a Lightning charging cable, and customers who want a 3.5mm jack will have to buy the $9 Lightning adapter?
 
So your saying that I cannot pick up my phone while it is charging? Are we going backwards or something? Wireless charging is a useless feature since you still need connect the damn pad to some power port. I don't see innovation here.

I rather have Apple invest in solar charging than this gimmick.


Why exactly can't you pick up your phone? You can. The charging stops and resumes when you put the phone back. In addition, you can still use the old way (with wire) so it's a win/win.
 
Genuine question (no really) are lightning cables that bad. I believe you and maybe I've just been lucky. If it's a problem I stand corrected.

YES!!!! The originals from Apple last me about 3-6 months tops. Not because of any physical damage, but iDevices just start rejecting them. And the 3rd party lighting cables are a crap shoot, even the Belkin cables that sell on Apple's own site. Belkin cables usually last me about 4 months tops before iDevices start rejecting them.
 
While I like the idea of having wireless charging, I hope that it's not the main new feature. Especially if it's the same type of wireless charging that Samsung and all the others use currently. I don't want to have to put a certain type of case on my phone to charge it.
It should be long distance charging.
 
YES!!!! The originals from Apple last me about 3-6 months tops. Not because of any physical damage, but iDevices just start rejecting them. And the 3rd party lighting cables are a crap shoot, even the Belkin cables that sell on Apple's own site. Belkin cables usually last me about 4 months tops before iDevices start rejecting them.
Then I guess (I know that this may be blaspheme) Apple’s original design spec (MFI requirements ) was poor if Apples implementation is just as prone to breaking as third-party solutions.
 
Glad to hear it will be on all 3 models (not planning on buying the $1k starting pro 8). Will enjoy it if they do indeed add it. Had it on a Nokia 920 I used as a development phone at work, as someone else said, its very nice to have once you start using it.
 
Can you explain to me how some people never have problems with lighting cables and some always have problem with them? I'm still using first cable from iPone 5 and apart from being yellow it is fine and has not suffered any damage.
It's most likely because the people that don't have problems with them actually grip the connector when connecting and disconnecting the the cable, and those that do typically lazily grab the cable portion and pull at odd angles to disconnect repeatedly, over and over again.
 
Last edited:
YES!!!! The originals from Apple last me about 3-6 months tops. Not because of any physical damage, but iDevices just start rejecting them. And the 3rd party lighting cables are a crap shoot, even the Belkin cables that sell on Apple's own site. Belkin cables usually last me about 4 months tops before iDevices start rejecting them.

And isn't it amazing then, that since 2007, all but one of my original Apple cables are still in use, and the one that frayed at the connector was a 30-pin cable? All of my Lightning cables work as well as they did from day one. I have never had a complaint about any Apple iOS cable I have ever used. Now the PowerBooks and MacBooks, that's a different story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyopicPaideia
It's most likely because the people that don't have problems with the, actually grip the connector when connecting and disconnecting the the cable, and those that do typically lazily grab the cable portion and pull at odd angles to disconnect repeatedly, over and over again.
Really? you are going there? "You're unplugging (plugging) it wrong"
 
I've recently converted back to Apple after being on Android for several years. Wireless charging is gimmicky and not as useful as you think. The one battery related thing I miss from Android is fast charging. Really hope Apple implements something similar. Going from dead phone to 70% in 20 mins is more important than being able to charge without having to through the huge inconvenience of plugging in a cable. 20 mins on a wireless charger will give you about 5-10%. Wireless charging is incredibly slow. Only useful for when charging overnight. Even then, your phone isn't on the charger just right and you wake up to a dead phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigjnyc
And isn't it amazing then, that since 2007, all but one of my original Apple cables are still in use, and the one that frayed at the connector was a 30-pin cable? All of my Lightning cables work as well as they did from day one. I have never had a complaint about any Apple iOS cable I have ever used. Now the PowerBooks and MacBooks, that's a different story.

My issue with Macbook cables is the physical quality. Electrical tape is my friend.
 
Every single year apple bringing new model but how can anyone change their phone every year? Atleast I can't do it.

it's so easy now with these leasing upgrade options from the wireless carriers or from Apple themselves. In addition to that iPhones have great resale value so you can pay the monthly then sell your current iPhone to pay off your lease and even make some cash on the deal if you keep it in good condition. the lease deals are essentially interest free loans or financing if you will.
 
Personally I don't really care about wireless charging unless Apple gets it to where wireless charging charges my phone just as fast as charging it with lightening cable and the internal heat doesn't cook the inside of the phone. Once Apple perfects that then I will be into wireless charging but til then I am happy using a lightening cable.
Where can I get this lightening cable?? How much does it lighten things by?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike4AU
While I like the idea of having wireless charging, I hope that it's not the main new feature. Especially if it's the same type of wireless charging that Samsung and all the others use currently. I don't want to have to put a certain type of case on my phone to charge it.
That's not even how it works on devices that have wireless charging built into them...
[doublepost=1486668570][/doublepost]
I genuinely don't get the appeal of inductive charging.
Convenience. I liked it when I had a phone that had it but it was by no means a deal breaker to me.
[doublepost=1486668618][/doublepost]
Honestly, I would rather they dump wireless charging, and make the phone thick enough to accommodate a flush camera lens and bring back the headphone jack. If they did that, it would be a day one purchase, but it is wishful thinking. Wireless charging is inefficient, and causes the heat issues. I have never had any issues with any of my lightning cables, and don't have a problem just plugging it in. I usually charge it on my nightstand while I sleep and start my day with 100% battery every day. 99% of my days I make it back to the charger without issue.
Quick wireless charging exists, it is no longer inefficient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McCool71
Convenience. I liked it when I had a phone that had it but it was by no means a deal breaker to me.

I find it more convenient to have a device that I can still use without being stuck to a charging pad. Was it a magnetically attached inductive charger?
 
I've recently converted back to Apple after being on Android for several years. Wireless charging is gimmicky and not as useful as you think. The one battery related thing I miss from Android is fast charging. Really hope Apple implements something similar. Going from dead phone to 70% in 20 mins is more important than being able to charge without having to through the huge inconvenience of plugging in a cable. 20 mins on a wireless charger will give you about 5-10%. Wireless charging is incredibly slow. Only useful for when charging overnight. Even then, your phone isn't on the charger just right and you wake up to a dead phone.

While convenient, if done alot fast charging has a significant effect on the battery capacity of Li Ion batts - reducing the usable capacity on your battery much sooner. I remember the Nissan Leaf, with its Li Ion battery, has a note in the owners manual talking about this effect with regard to fast charging the battery. That alone would probably make Apple stay away from it...and the Android vendors totally go for it.

As stated on battery university "Avoid so-called ultra-fast chargers that claim to fully charge Li-ion in less than one hour.":

http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithium_based_batteries
 
  • Like
Reactions: HVDynamo
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.