And imagine the ensuing health crisis. Neither of those technologies are powerful enough. You'd have to push an insane amount of power around, and that's very inefficient.Imagine if it's charged via WiFi. Or via cellular.
And imagine the ensuing health crisis. Neither of those technologies are powerful enough. You'd have to push an insane amount of power around, and that's very inefficient.Imagine if it's charged via WiFi. Or via cellular.
Apple is widely rumored to launch three new iPhones this year, and KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo now claims that all of them will feature wireless charging.
Kuo said wireless charging increases the internal temperature of smartphones, so he expects the rumored iPhone 8 with an OLED display and glass casing to have a new 3D Touch module with "additional graphite sheet lamination" in order to prevent the device from malfunctioning due to overheating.
An excerpt from Kuo's research note obtained by MacRumors:The new 3D Touch module could be up to $5 more expensive for Apple to procure per phone. While that is a minimal increase, it lends further credence to a report claiming the high-end iPhone 8 could cost upwards of $1,000 in the United States due to a significant redesign and the use of premium parts.
Kuo previously said Apple will switch to all-glass casing for next year's entire iPhone lineup, including the more iterative 4.7-inch iPhone 7s and 5.5-inch iPhone 7s Plus, in order to support wireless charging. It remains unclear if the wireless charging will be based on long-range or inductive technologies.
Article Link: All Three New 2017 iPhones to Feature Wireless Charging This Year
It was with Palm 6-7 years ago.
God forbid! I can barely carry my heavy iPhone as it is now!This will make phones bigger and heavier.
Would you be suprisied if Apple didn't kill a useful port?A lot of posts so not sure if anyone brought it up yet but wireless charging on the iPhone possibly(probably)means the death of the lightning port.
Bye bye ports.
Would you be suprisied if Apple didn't kill a useful port?
Would you be suprisied if Apple didn't kill a useful port?
Hmm... old iPhone starts at $650.
R&D Dept: "Well, if we include wireless charging, the phone is more susceptible to heat. We can add some extra shielding for about $5."
Tim Cook: "Well... ok. Just be sure to raise the retail price of the phone by $350!"
Why? What ever wireless charging solution Apple uses the thing that charges your iPhone plugs into a port somewhere. Whats the difference between (1) iPhone plugs into mains supply (2) iPhone wirelessly charges via "device" that plugs into mains supply?And i most certainly looking forward to this day.
Honestly, I would rather they dump wireless charging, and make the phone thick enough to accommodate a flush camera lens and bring back the headphone jack. If they did that, it would be a day one purchase, but it is wishful thinking. Wireless charging is inefficient, and causes the heat issues. I have never had any issues with any of my lightning cables, and don't have a problem just plugging it in. I usually charge it on my nightstand while I sleep and start my day with 100% battery every day. 99% of my days I make it back to the charger without issue.
So your saying that I cannot pick up my phone while it is charging? Are we going backwards or something? Wireless charging is a useless feature since you still need connect the damn pad to some power port. I don't see innovation here.
I rather have Apple invest in solar charging than this gimmick.
Distance.Whats the difference between (1) iPhone plugs into mains supply (2) iPhone wirelessly charges via "device" that plugs into mains supply?
Why? What ever wireless charging solution Apple uses the thing that charges your iPhone plugs into a port somewhere. Whats the difference between (1) iPhone plugs into mains supply (2) iPhone wirelessly charges via "device" that plugs into mains supply?
As opposed to every non-removable battery dying by the end.So much negativity for wireless charging surprises me. If they have worked out the kinks and the batteries / factories storing them don't explode then I'm all for it. Every iPhone I've had has always ended up with a slightly dodgy port by the end.
I'm sure during testing and planning they thought of that
Since that seems to be the #1 concern among members here, I imagine that question was asked at least once throughout the engineering process
LOL best reply so far; at last a realist!Distance.
Maybe!
If wireless charging can extend the distance from device to charging pad/block/whatever (as rumoured), so that the device(iPhone) can charge at several inches, feet or maybe further, then it's a huge game-changer.
Imagine your iPhone charging just by being in the same room as your charger!!
Yup, perhaps fantasy at the moment, but every technology we currently take for granted was fantasy at some point!!
![]()
How is KGI right so many times? Are they straight up just predicting?