I want 120 Hz if it’s not gonna mess with the price, it’s not gonna mess with the battery life, it’s not gonna mess with color accuracy, and it’s not gonna mess with processor speed. If it messes with any of those, I don’t want it. Apple can save it until they can implement it properly with LTPO technology, which is rumored for next year.What is the point of your complaining? Typical blind who has to senselessly defend Apple for not having particular features on their devices.
You should want 120Hz, if not, then don’t sound like you don’t want the feature. Clearly you don’t know any better.
Steve Jobs was a person who would delay and delay a feature until they got it absolutely the way they wanted it. He would never rush anything, even if they had to have a new version of the device out every single year. That’s why the iPod touch third GEN didn’t have a camera, but the fourth GEN did. Even though there were rumors that the third GEN wood up until the day before it was announced.
That’s why they never stuffed a G5 into a powerbook, no matter how many customers bugged them too.
That’s why adding a retina display to the second generation iPad was scrapped about a month before it came out. The original A5 chip just could not handle it, so it was delayed for the third generation iPad. The info about that retina display had already been rumored for months, we had the exact resolution and everything. And it was scrapped just a month before the product was announced. So no, this isn’t new for Apple. They wait until they can have perfection, and if they can’t, then the feature will be scrapped and saved for a later date.
Keep this in mind, if you enable 120 Hz on the galaxy S 20, the resolution gets down scale to 1080 P. They just cannot handle both a high resolution at a high refresh rate at the same time. Apple would never compromise like that