Just so you won't be disappointed ...You're welcome! Anything to lighten up the knuckleheads who keep thinking this is a spelling and grammar class!
The poster spelled "Aluminium" wrong actually.
Just so you won't be disappointed ...You're welcome! Anything to lighten up the knuckleheads who keep thinking this is a spelling and grammar class!
Help me here. Who would email out, to a public website, a website with a live account? Plus, how do you stumble across someone elses live account?
the desktop image is not LEOPARD if thats not fake i don't know what is.
Help me here. Who would email out, to a public website, a website with a live account? Plus, how do you stumble across someone elses live account?
You can photoshop itunes account information![]()
You're welcome! Anything to lighten up the knuckleheads who keep thinking this is a spelling and grammar class!
lookmark said:++. Give MR some credit here. These aren't some random mock-up images. They're from someone with an @apple.com address.
Again, these things can be photoshopped. Unless you yourself can verify with surety that this guy is real and at Apple, I'll say it's your average Joe who did some photoshopping. And even if it is by someone at Apple, I don't believe these images.
See this image:
http://images.macrumors.com/article/2008/04/16/235503-new3.jpg
iTunes login/password blurred out. That was/is a valid something@apple.com account on iTunes.
The person who submitted the URL was not the author, but found it.
arn
I agree. Even though I believe these are fake, I am not blaming or dissing MacRumors at all for posting this. These are the types of rumors I enjoy reading about and discussing, and in my mind arn and crew are just doing their job. Let's not become too critical of the site...
Uhhh... That's what I was saying.![]()
the web page also listed a valid "@apple.com" iTunes Store account and password. Due to the live account information listed, we are not linking directly to the site, but have provided some screenshots below.
You can't photoshop a valid iTunes account with an Apple.com email address.
Please provide me with a valid login name something@apple.com and password for the iTunes Store. If you can, I will agree with you.
arn
I guess Ive is looking on this forum for his design ideas...
You can't photoshop a valid iTunes account with an Apple.com email address.
Please provide me with a valid login name something@apple.com and password for the iTunes Store. If you can, I will agree with you.
arn
Why not just email the link? How come no one else has found those pictures?
See the post above yours, for further clarification
The information on the website is not just a picture but verifiable information (text)
From the article
Or better explained:
Still have the tiger desktop, eh?
And if that's the macbook, it seems to be getting bigger. At least it won't have the cracking issue...
Um, no, "Aluminium" is indeed a correct spelling of the element in question. It's not a made up alloy or anything else. Did you perhaps incorrectly think that "Aluminum" is the only accepted spelling of the element? If so, consider yourself having learned something today.![]()
![]()
As a .Mac user myself, the most disturbing part about this whole debacle is the idea that "some guy" was able to access .Mac pages of other users that not only display their stuff but also conveniently list their password, iTunes balance, and other personal information.I worked for Apple, you are not aloud to put anything on your .Mac account that has anything to do with Apple.
Done Deal Pal.
You can't photoshop a valid iTunes account with an Apple.com email address.
Please provide me with a valid login name something@apple.com and password for the iTunes Store. If you can, I will agree with you.
arn
As a .Mac user myself, the most disturbing part about this whole debacle is the idea that "some guy" was able to access .Mac pages of other users that not only display their stuff but also conveniently list their password, iTunes balance, and other personal information.
If that is even possible, then .Mac has a rather serious security problem no? And isn't that more of a page 1 story as opposed to the page 2 story that this "leak" is?
It makes me think the whole story about "finding" these pages is bogus or some kind of cover story.