Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ooooh...look at all the music snobs taking jabs at the popular pop act. How original. Lame. Like what you like...it's an opinion. Which is different from fact.

I could just as easily rip into you hipster snobs by downing your music preferences since I listen to underground hip-hop. But I won't. Because I understand that me liking Vinnie Paz and Prodigy doesn't make your preferences less valid.
 
Like what you like...it's an opinion. Which is different from fact.

...me liking...

Case in point.

If it's still all just about what you like, then you're still at square 1. I like plenty of bad music. Hell I've got a collection of it from my teens & twenties & there's a bunch of prodigy in there too. But at least now I have the sense to call it what it is. You might too. You might never.
 
I bought the album but I'm not going to sign up for the Cloud. If I dump a bunch of my stuff in there, Amazon gets to hold it hostage twelve months from now. Good move, but I'm not falling for it.
 
No.

Chopin, Mingus, Dylan, Rachmaninov, Willie Dixon, D. Reinhardt, Odetta, Brahms, T.Monk, Ledbelly, Ravel, N. Drake, Howlin Wolf, Copland, Pastorius, Callas, Renbourn/Graham/Jansch, freaking Beethoven...

You could spend your entire lifetime listening to popular music actually done WELL, by musicians with above-average skill AND talent, without hearing any of it twice, and still not make it though it all. To ignore that in favor of albums full of mindless dance floor filler written at a fifth grade level is...

Okay, no one, well, except possibly That freak of nature Mozart, was born knowing good music. We all started being inspired by crude junk, it's really okay. We all bought albums based on how trendy it was, or hot the girl on the cover is, or what zany antics the "entertainer" got up to for press. And you know, if you listen to the worst album in the world enough times, you'll start to like it. So that's fine. But recognize it for what it is, a product. This is not music for musics sake, or timeless art. This is trendy, consumable, disposable product that you bought because everyone else bought it, and going into it thinking it's going to be great, combined with enough repetition, will make you think it truly is wonderful. There are thousands of better songwriters and performers than this woman in every empty coffee shop with a rug on the floor. Are you going to run out and give their sweet words an equally open listen?

Assuming it's the detractors that are misinformed or narrow minded or "musically immature" is nothing more than self serving. It isn't about "taste", it's about marketing vs music. We've all been where you are. Some of us just learned the difference and decided we prefer music. But it's not for everybody.


And opinions are like a**holes. Everyone has one. But your opinion is just that...an opinion. Just because you think that type of music is better doesn't make it so, and it certainly doesn't make you smarter than everyone else. No matter what you may think.

Chill out and listen to what you like, and we'll do the same. Call me "musically immature" if you like, but I prefer to be awake when I'm listening to music.
 
Amazon's CloudDrive is just remarketing of their mature cloud storage offers to consumers, whereas Apple is pretty new to the business… and seeing how shoddy MobileMe has been so far, I'm not looking forward to any Apple iCloud offering.
 
Flash?

Looks like I'm out of luck. The uploader require flash, which I don't have (and don't want) on my MBP. Anybody else run into this?
 
I bought the album but I'm not going to sign up for the Cloud. If I dump a bunch of my stuff in there, Amazon gets to hold it hostage twelve months from now. Good move, but I'm not falling for it.

You know you don't HAVE to put stuff in it?
 
I like Lady Gaga her music is fun. Not every musician/artist has to be Jack White. Once I got past the stage of disliking her simply because she exploded onto the scene and has this huge persona, I realized her music is just a lot of fun.
 
amazon's clouddrive is just remarketing of their mature cloud storage offers to consumers, whereas apple is pretty new to the business… and seeing how shoddy mobileme has been so far, i'm not looking forward to any apple icloud offering.

+1 (I've used S3 for a couple of years...)
 
Amazon's CloudDrive is just remarketing of their mature cloud storage offers to consumers, whereas Apple is pretty new to the business… and seeing how shoddy MobileMe has been so far, I'm not looking forward to any Apple iCloud offering.

No problems with MobileMe for me.
 
This is great, album was pretty good plus 20gb free for a year all for $.99! Now hopefully Amazon will get an app out for the iPhone so I can have it all on the cloud :)
 
When you buy the album for 99 cents you get 20GB of cloud storage automatically. It's worth it just for that alone. Even if you could care less about Lada Gaga.

+1
Which is the whole point of the promo. She's popular enough that Amazon will instantly get a massive amount of fans using their cloud service and even if you're not a fan, Lady Gaga's name plus the cost of a dollar will get the attention of others to try their service.

The complaints here seem to be missing the point in the same way I remember people crapping on Twitter when it came out. Now, like then, whether you wanted to follow Aston Kutcher or Oprah is not the issue. Its the shifting way we consume a product. Then it was news and info, this is paid music.
 
I bought the album but I'm not going to sign up for the Cloud. If I dump a bunch of my stuff in there, Amazon gets to hold it hostage twelve months from now. Good move, but I'm not falling for it.

:confused:You know you can both upload and download, right? Keep your music in the cloud for free for 11 months, accessible anywhere. You're not losing anything you upload and if you buy from Amazon, download it and keep a copy in the cloud. Win-win.
 
Mentioning the Beatles and Goo-Goo in the same sentence is blashpemy. One is the standard by which all are judged, the other is a talentless bimbo.

Talentless? Hardly. She writes her own songs, plays instruments, sings live, picks her own beats, etc. The girl got into Tisch school of arts at age 17. Only roughly 50 people in the world ever have done that. She has talent, now whether you like her talent or not is another story.

I personally hate the Beatles music. I can't stand stand it. That being said I I can't deny the fact they are a very talented group and their influence in the music world was huge.

Its possible to recognize that someone is talented but not like their music.
 
I seriously doubt Gaga or the label teamed with Amazon for the promotion.

I'd assume Amazon is covering the difference from their marketing budget or similar.

Like the article stated, this is just promotion for Amazons cloud service.

It's all an assumption though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.