One shouldnt ignore the obvious fact that better hardware will smooth over some of the software issues, either.
You really think buggy, poorly written software that has good hardware underneath it will perform good?
One shouldnt ignore the obvious fact that better hardware will smooth over some of the software issues, either.
The only one I'm interested is the paperwhite, and it's the last to become available.![]()
The truck has to catch up with the deer too, before leaving a bloody pool on the pavement. The sleeping giant is wide awake, and its offering is undoubtedly good enough for IT-departments to truly need a good reason not to pick MSFT (personally, i'd say its superior, but my point holds regardless). From an enterprise perspective, going with MSFT "just works", to speak Apple-tongue.
As for your second remark, i think you are wrong. First, touch is becoming ubiquitous. Perhaps not touch screens, but in the coming years we'll see rapid adoptions of trackpads, smart mice, and other ways of intuitive ways of interacting with the new interface. Second, the "touch interface" is essentially an interface you really dont have to spend much time using, unless you actually want to: the desktop is still there for all purposes necessary.
Also, MSFT has an ace up their sleeve with Kinect, that could easily be integrated in future AOI-kits, if necessary. Combined with the other things mentioned under point one, this - i believe - will make the transition fairly seamless.
---------------
Think about it: if you were to convince an IT-department, already standardized on MSFT, to buy iPads instead of W8 tablets - what would be your core argument? Can you, honestly, think of even one that would be convincing enough?
Think about it: if you were to convince an IT-department, already standardized on MSFT, to buy iPads instead of W8 tablets - what would be your core argument? Can you, honestly, think of even one that would be convincing enough?
Microsoft greatest strength is its already big in business which will definitely help.
There were already tablet versions of Microsoft OS. They have not taken off. Even in this tablet craze, I'm doubtful we are going to see a wide adoption of Win8 Pro tablets ( Not talking WinRT tablets ) unless a major over haul into how a desktop OS works on the tablet. I'm talking some major innovations, not just tweaks.
Both of which are fixable, as the device and operating system matures.
For such a buggy platform and lack of intuitive UI, their Kindle Fire gen 1 was rather successful. The new Fire offering Amazon just announced today takes it up several notches.
As a consumer, I am interested in seeing the iPad Mini and the new Fire HD battle it out in the market place.
These all look like great machines at great price points. Even the $69 Kindle (which is the one I got for $79) is a great device and frankly something that pretty much everyone who reads books should own.
Originally Posted by divinox
One shouldnt ignore the obvious fact that better hardware will smooth over some of the software issues, either.
You really think buggy, poorly written software that has good hardware underneath it will perform good?
This is what tablets are worth anyways. Nothing but simple web-browsing devices. You want more, you gotta wait for upcoming Intel tablets.
This is what tablets are worth anyways. Nothing but simple web-browsing devices. You want more, you gotta wait for upcoming Intel tablets.
I have 6 GB data.
Yes, then losing customers. The new Kindle Fire/HD is an excellent product at a low price.
You're looking at this wrong. It's not for people like you who download large amounts while on the road. It's more for people like me, who don't want to have to pay yet another ridiculously overpriced connection fee just so they can get their tablets online beyond wifi.
You're not qualified to say if it is excellent or not. The last Kindle Fire was a joke.
wow, just wow. 1920x1200; and apple is going to release the ipad mini with 1024x768???
Lol. Sad.![]()
Update 12:58 PM: Amazon's Kindle Fire HD press release clarifies that the resolution on the 7-inch model is 1280x800.
HAHAHAHA!!!!
I can't see how anyone can complain about the data deal. Like I wrote earlier - you get a $10 kickback to use for apps and then you get the SAME data plan the iPad had for 250mb but for $3.33 a month vs $15 a month.
Someone really needs to explain to me how this is remotely "bad."
There are also 3gb and 5gb plans available. Just like with other mobile devices and I would find it almost impossible to believe that ATT would charge more for these plans than they do for other mobile devices.
So for the casual user - they save a TON of money.
$180 (iPad 250mb/month) vs $40. Plus if they will have saved some $ going with the Fire vs the iPad at the get go. Note: I am not arguing which is a better device or anything remotely. But for people buying the Fire - overall cost of ownership is less and for many worthwhile.
----------
Define joke.
The new Kindles WILL HAVE FREAKING ADS. So all you fans get to look at ADS on your new device. ENJOY!!!! What a joke. Oh, and the resolution was wrong. Oh and Nokia didn't use the actual camera. Desperate pathetic wannabes.
Update 12:58 PM: Amazon's Kindle Fire HD press release clarifies that the resolution on the 7-inch model is 1280x800.
HAHAHAHA!!!!
The Kindle really does look good, but it's somewhat pointless to buy if you already have an iPad. I've heard it's better for reading than the iPad, but the iPad seems good enough.
----------
That is a higher resolution than the 7.85" iPad mini.
You're looking at this wrong. It's not for people like you who download large amounts while on the road. It's more for people like me, who don't want to have to pay yet another ridiculously overpriced connection fee just so they can get their tablets online beyond wifi.
We don't really know the resolution of the iPad mini yet - it only makes sense that it would be iPad 1/2 resolutions but we're doing a lot of assuming here.
And yet again Amazon can't seem to sell these things outside of the US
You really think buggy, poorly written software that has good hardware underneath it will perform good?