What about letting the user swipe to both sides?
I've already suggested it to Apple as a UI/Usability bug report. I really hope they do it. For that matter, why not allow Safari tabs to be dismissed in both directions, too? Why only left?
What about letting the user swipe to both sides?
So basically you want it back to the way it was when people complained it was confusing. OK.
I didn't find it confusing in the slightest.
Obviously enough people did as Apple changed it.
It seems such a natural solution that I'm positive they can't for Patent reasons.
No. That looks very off-center.
This thread is silly. People complain about the weirdest things...
Sliding either way is perhaps a patented idea?
I don't know why Apple just makes it possible to slide left or right in order to unlock the phone or answer a call? It makes it much more useful, especially if you use the phone in your left hand.
So iPhone 1-6 was confusing?
The (even just small) gain in usability with the added arrow overrides the minuscule loss in aesthetics (if any at all). And that's the attention to detail. There's really all there's to it...certainly not enough to "discuss" for 7 pages.Steve Jobs use to obsess over small details as well. Sometimes it can make a big difference.![]()
Natural for whom? Is unlocking something that should be related to ease and natural feeling or should it be about a specific and deliberate action they needs to be taken to unlock the phone?It's more natural to slide your thumb right to left.
It's more natural to slide your thumb right to left.
Perhaps all the more reason to have the unlock be somewhat more deliberate than "natural".I think it is, too, because that's how we flip from one home screen to the next.
It seems such a natural solution that I'm positive they can't for Patent reasons.
It's more natural to slide your thumb right to left.
Perhaps all the more reason to have the unlock be somewhat more deliberate than "natural".
So that there's less of a possibility of unlocking the phone unintentionally--simply by taking it out of your pocket while (accidentally) touching part of the screen, or something similar.Why do you say that?
So that there's less of a possibility of unlocking the phone unintentionally--simply by taking it out of your pocket while (accidentally) touching part of the screen, or something similar.
We've already seen quite a few posts of people suddenly running into issues with the phone unlocking unintentionally since they've installed iOS 7, with the likely cause being that the unlock action now can be activated anywhere on the screen (rather than in a particular part of the screen like before) and only requires a swipe of about 1/3 of the screen for it to take (rather than at least 2/3 if not more before). Simplifying unlocking even further (like making it possible to do it in any direction) would likely only make that issue worse.
The whole lock part there is to prevent anything unintentional, so unlocking should be something quite intentional (more or less as it was before iOS 7 even).
I can see some improvements in general, just as long as they don't come at the cost of actual usefulness of the locking itself. Seems like they already have some of that usefulness unfortunately lost or at least degraded (more for some than others) with the new way things are in iOS 7.I see your point, but I think the answer is to make it harder to unlock by accident, not to limit the ways we can unlock it on purpose. For example, perhaps it could require a swipe across 2/3 of the screen for it to unlock. Something like that.
Seriously, there is a patent that does not allow them to add a feature that would allow a user to swipe either way to unlock? That is ridiculous if true....