I tend to steer clear of chocolate coated pork chops though, and mince-stuffed apples. Call me unadventurous if you will.Or chocolate and other sugary foods, like erm....fruit.
Those pesky carbohydrates lurk everywhere...
I tend to steer clear of chocolate coated pork chops though, and mince-stuffed apples. Call me unadventurous if you will.Or chocolate and other sugary foods, like erm....fruit.
I heard a rumour they were only in meat.Those pesky carbohydrates lurk everywhere...
Just because of this thread, I'm going to make sure I eat this tomorrow;
![]()
T![]()
Korean Pork Don and Gyoza dumplings. Look what you're missing!
On a serious note, fair do's if you can make a go of it - I really couldn't, quite a few of my friends are veggies though and they haven't dropped dead and the food they make is pretty tasty.
I love to eat chicken, if I could find something that I loved to replace it, I'd maybe go for it. Fish I could rule out too, even though I love salmon, but I don't really see fish in the same light as other types of meat..
This is how easy it is to be vegan, you could just eat this instead
![]()
![]()
Point is, vegans eat the exact same stuff as everyone else, ours just doesn't have dead animal in it.
Thanks, but no thanks.Dead animals can be very tasty, I recommend that herbivores try some once in a while to expand their horizons.
I would love to go vegetarian. I just don't practically see how it's possible without a massive commitment in time and research.
How bout this?
![]()
or this?
![]()
or this?
![]()
or even this?
![]()
How bout this?
![]()
or this?
![]()
or this?
![]()
or even this?
![]()
the issue I have with those is that the amount of processing they go through to get to look and taste like that ,
it might be healthier just to eat the real chicken
It depends, some go through very little processing and use non-gmo organic whole soybeans like gardein and gardenburger.
Boca on the other hand tends to use more processed soy.
Chicken is absolutely god awful for you, especially when produced the way conventional chicken is.
That is absolutely blatantly false.
Our anatomy actually suggests that we should not eat meat.
No claws, no incisors, long intestines ( Every animal on the planet that eats a lot of meat has a short intestine)
...
Chicken is absolutely god awful for you
Can you provide peer-reviewed scientific literature that demonstrates that chicken specifically — and not it's processing nor any additives — is awful for you?
especially when produced the way conventional chicken is.
Yes some are quite good tasting and good quality products, others I have seen are absolute trash.
the other issue with these products is people who are Gluten sensitive cannot eat most of them.
Why would chicken be awful for me ?
Majority of my meat is local as well as SPCA and Organic certified (milk and eggs too).
My point is that a GMO pesticide sprayed, waxed, and who knows how else treated to look pretty vegetable is not going to be a healthier choice than
chicken or beef raised on organic pasture in pure terms of stuff that is toxic to our bodies.
I love the sniping, divisive comments, and personal crusading going on in what is essentially a thread about nutrition. It's interesting to see the offensiveness of both sides of the isle and really demonstrates the identity politics at play in what we as a society and as individuals consume, and the degree to which we moralize our choices and are threatened by the moralizing of others. I guess it's true what they say -- we are what we eat.
As far as what the human body has evolved to eat; your body is a complex piece of machinery that's evolved to consume and process whatever it is that will promote the greatest chance of survival and spreading your genes. Part of the reason for the immense proliferation of humanity is our innate adaptability, and as such you should eat whatever it is you feel is going to promote your longevity and health. There are plenty of available studies that extol the many health virtues of a vegetarian diet, just as there are many studies that demonstrate value for a number of diets, lifestyles, and exercise modalities. There are even studies coming out now about paleolithic (or heavily animal based) diets succeeding at promoting good health and body composition.
We like to think in terms of singular factors, that there's a lone variable that can be plugged into the equation of good health and unlock it. The truth is that the solution is multifaceted and good health is a measured result of many considerations. In terms of nutrition alone a dietary choice is successful when it reduces the consumption of unhealthy calories (typically processed) and increases the consumption of whole foods. If you feel that a vegetarian diet will provide you with the framework for making healthy eating choices, then you should do it. Just remember to balance it with adequate sleep, water, and exercise.
did you miss this?
A little snipey, but overall, I agree.