Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You certainly implied it.
How about we stick with what I actually said. I certainly think it’s likely, but I never offered any guarantees.

As far as whether alt app stores on android have exclusives, of course they do. For example:
 
Pathetic of Apple. The iPhone was a success because of the Apps other developers made for their platform. Windows Phone died because it lacked apps

Apple should recognize that developers are in a symbiotic relationship with them. They both need each other. Apple's greedy, shortsighted, disrespectful treatment of devs could end with them losing out if there's ever a chance for developers to make better money somewhere else

No respect equals no loyalty
 
They both need each other. Apple's greedy, shortsighted, disrespectful treatment of devs could end with them losing out if there's ever a chance for developers to make better money somewhere else

No respect equals no loyalty

No doubt also part of why there is so much reticence to lean in on developing for VisionOS.

"Burn me once", and all that sort of thing...

(the total lack of a meaningfully large addressable market is of course the main reason to not develop for vOS)
 
No doubt also part of why there is so much reticence to lean in on developing for VisionOS.

"Burn me once", and all that sort of thing...
Exactly! I would absolutely not bring my app to vision OS out of spite. If Apple had a better relationship with devs, they'd be making apps for VisionOS to explore the new hardware, having fun. Just like the days when iOS was new and Apple had a decade of goodwill from developers

Tim Cook is shortsighted and lacks vision
 
Pathetic of Apple. The iPhone was a success because of the Apps other developers made for their platform. Windows Phone died because it lacked apps

Apple should recognize that developers are in a symbiotic relationship with them. They both need each other. Apple's greedy, shortsighted, disrespectful treatment of devs could end with them losing out if there's ever a chance for developers to make better money somewhere else

No respect equals no loyalty
Think there is a critics bubble which ignores the real world. This is in my opinion. Most people are happy with the iPhone and Apple . Most devs are happy with Apple. And there is a symbiotic relationship. The App Store though belongs to Apple.
 
As far as whether alt app stores on android have exclusives, of course they do. For example:

I'm glad you mentioned F-Droid! I think it's fantastic, it's a bastion of free and open-source software. Such a thing cannot exist for iPhone as things stand - and that's a detriment, not a benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neomorpheus
I'm glad you mentioned F-Droid! I think it's fantastic, it's a bastion of free and open-source software. Such a thing cannot exist for iPhone as things stand - and that's a detriment, not a benefit.
Way to change the topic! I’m glad it exists for those that need it. Free and open-source software is an important and necessary bullwork to corporate and government overreach. We certainly agree here!
 
Factually greedy is a weasel word term. And no Apple isn’t more greedy than Nintendo. If Nintendo weren’t greedy they would open up their platform voluntarily.
28% market share but makes the most profit in electronics unless that is incorrect
So is that not greed
Yet certain individuals claim epic are after a free ride
 
Apple has this one right!!!!! Side loading will destroy what Apple spent billions on to keep sterile …… its APP store
 
  • Haha
Reactions: neomorpheus
What people fail to fully understand is that the Apple App Store review process is primarily about reviewing compliance with Apple business terms and policies. It's not about checking for safety or security.
Translated to the loyalists "Meaning, it must benefits apple's bank account, not the customers".
Pathetic of Apple. The iPhone was a success because of the Apps other developers made for their platform. Windows Phone died because it lacked apps

Apple should recognize that developers are in a symbiotic relationship with them. They both need each other. Apple's greedy, shortsighted, disrespectful treatment of devs could end with them losing out if there's ever a chance for developers to make better money somewhere else

No respect equals no loyalty
If the iPhone was subsidized by the app store, I would say ok, but that's not the case.

Apple is a hardware company and selling more hardware would definitely help their bank account.

Tim Apple is hyper focused in abusing his customers base as much as he can, instead of expanding the userbase.

Right now, they could make a lot more money if both ios and iPhone were more open and Macs were easier to open up, upgrade and expand, in the form of eGPUs, for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
No it’s not.

Epic is after a free ride. They want the govt to bust open Apple.
If a company only has a 28% market share but make the most profit in the whole of tech then that makes them greedy & it also shows how you can’t compare an App Store on a console to that on iOS App Store because they are very different business models

How is epic after a free ride don’t you pay to get on iOS as a platform?
 
How is epic after a free ride don’t you pay to get on iOS as a platform?

The argument here is usually about having "access" to iOS customers.

Apple likes to treat this situation like they "own us all" simply because we bought iDevices.

It's completely inappropriately forcing themselves into the middle of transactions they have no right to be a part of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neomorpheus
I want the choice to be able to load whatever i want in my devices.

Either stop your hypocrisy (its for your safety, not for our profits) censorship or allow proper sideloading.

Again, I dont understand apple's customers that insist in having LESS options, which conveniently works in favor of Apples coffers and worse, they insist in taking that option away from the ones that do want that option.

If I paid over 1 thousand dollar for a device, I should be able to do with it whatever I like, not what Tim Apple and Jobs ghoul spirit decides.

Edit thanks for confirming my point.

What you want already exists. It's called Android. Both platforms have advanced so far that there's very little difference in hardware anymore. The difference is software. They are very different experiences. What you are complaining that you want literally already exists with android right? So why take away the other platform just to make it like the one you could already be using.
 
The argument here is usually about having "access" to iOS customers.
The argument is usually about charging for access to their platform. A completely normal business arrangement.

Apple likes to treat this situation like they "own us all" simply because we bought iDevices.
No, they like to charge for access to their platform like thousands of other businesses. You’re just using loaded language to describe a normal transaction.

It's completely inappropriately forcing themselves into the middle of transactions they have no right to be a part of.
Except they do have that right in the US. And almost all companies do in the EU. What countries are struggling with now is whether their market power justifies taking that right away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bungaree.Chubbins
The argument here is usually about having "access" to iOS customers.

Apple likes to treat this situation like they "own us all" simply because we bought iDevices.

It's completely inappropriately forcing themselves into the middle of transactions they have no right to be a part of.
What’s very odd about this commission saga is this on one hand apple compare themselves to consoles and when it’s gets pointed out that there is a flaw in that comparison then it’s oh but we mean like this not that
It’s the exact same tactics they use when courts or governments them
 
What’s very odd about this commission saga is this on one hand apple compare themselves to consoles and when it’s gets pointed out that there is a flaw in that comparison then it’s oh but we mean like this not that
It’s the exact same tactics they use when courts or governments them

200.gif


Exactly right ... the narratives and rationalizations get moved around to "favor Apple" no matter what.
 
If a company only has a 28% market share but make the most profit in the whole of tech then that makes them greedy
No. It makes the company popular and profitable. Greed is a weasel word. Apple curated the “best” customers who willingly buy Apple products and services. This “greedy” thing is nonsense.
& it also shows how you can’t compare an App Store on a console to that on iOS App Store because they are very different business models
And still I’d like to see console makers who have a more locked down environment be mandated to allow side loading and alternative app stores.
How is epic after a free ride don’t you pay to get on iOS as a platform?
Maybe not free as in free beer but near a $0 cost.
 
[…]

The problem is the world’s most valuable company (much of the time) gets to make its own rules
well yeah apple Makes the hardware and licenses the software.
which isn’t fair.
It’s as far as Ferrari making decisions about its products.
The wealth discrepancy has only increased and will continue as long as companies
What does this have to do with anything in this topic.
like Apple focus on shareholders and payoff politicians to allow the ecosystem to run without competition or choice for consumers.
I would exit the ecosystem if it’s actually that bad. Oh wait? I can do that?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: djphat2000
I love this response if you don’t like it then go else where so based on this logic then people should never complain about anything & just accept it from anything in life or is it just because it’s apple & epic are challenging the conditions that are on offer so is that what individuals do now just accept what they are given in life
Yes.

The United States of America is not a communist state.

You’ve property rights and nobody should tell you what you do with your land, your house, your food, your things, your money, your company, your software ecosystem.

Epic should build their own software ecosystem if they want it differently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djphat2000
Yes.

The United States of America is not a communist state.

You’ve property rights and nobody should tell you what you do with your land, your house, your food, your things, your money, your company, your software ecosystem.

Epic should build their own software ecosystem if they want it differently.

Umm

This is about a case in Australia
 
No. It makes the company popular and profitable. Greed is a weasel word. Apple curated the “best” customers who willingly buy Apple products and services. This “greedy” thing is nonsense.

And still I’d like to see console makers who have a more locked down environment be mandated to allow side loading and alternative app stores.

Maybe not free as in free beer but near a $0 cost.
I don’t think you’re first statement is entirely correct

Again this is whataboutery why compare apple to Nintendo and then when it’s pointed out for example the switch console was released in 2018 and replaced in 2025 with the switch 2
In that time apple released the XS and now on the 17 series yet according to certain apple fans oh that’s different then don’t compare yourself to console makers then

But there is a cost to use iOS so it’s not free and as a company apple only have themselves to blame in this situation
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.