Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I want the choice to be able to load whatever i want in my devices.

Either stop your hypocrisy (its for your safety, not for our profits) censorship or allow proper sideloading.

Again, I dont understand apple's customers that insist in having LESS options, which conveniently works in favor of Apples coffers and worse, they insist in taking that option away from the ones that do want that option.

If I paid over 1 thousand dollar for a device, I should be able to do with it whatever I like, not what Tim Apple and Jobs ghoul spirit decides.

Edit thanks for confirming my point.

You have the choice to buy a device that allows you to load whatever you want: Android
 
As I posted in another thread. You can do whatever you want with your hardware. The software is your issue, so delete it and put your own OS on your hardware.
A strange suggestion when Apple uses cryptographic controls which prevent not just loading alternate OS but even rolling back to previous Apple OS versions.

But even when the cryptographic controls can be broken there is still the issue that Apple’s hardware is undocumented and driverless which makes development of alternative OS extremely difficult. It took years, for example, to get even rudimentary graphics support for Linux under Apple Silicon (when booting natively as opposed to running virtualized under MacOS)
 
Apple is 100% correct. Objectively. Apple risked billions in R&D and Epic just wants to take what Apple built and profit.
Yup. These companies don’t care about consumers, they want that sweet 30% commission back in their pocket and using “consumer choice” and people’s emotional attachment to hating a company as the vessel to get there.
 
I want the choice to be able to load whatever i want in my devices.

Either stop your hypocrisy (its for your safety, not for our profits) censorship or allow proper sideloading.

Again, I dont understand apple's customers that insist in having LESS options, which conveniently works in favor of Apples coffers and worse, they insist in taking that option away from the ones that do want that option.

If I paid over 1 thousand dollar for a device, I should be able to do with it whatever I like, not what Tim Apple and Jobs ghoul spirit decides.

Edit thanks for confirming my point.
If you want that flexibility, get an Android phone. I like that the Apple ecosystem is designed the way it is - which is one of the reasons why I use Apple devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marte91
They have other means to the same ends. Ad revenue so games/apps are totally free no matter how many get downloaded. Free apps exist because there are also paid apps that pay the 30% commission. This is how the system gets to work. If you want to sell an application (from the start), and you're not sure if you're going to make it or not. That is part of the risk of starting a business no?
Free games? Adds? I’m speaking of 0% commission for selling it or in app sales and be allowed to keep all the revenue as a developer.
Its competition in the service and store that I as a consumer as well as developer can use on iOS.
Whom would you say has my best interest in mind. Apple on Apple's devices, or EPIC on Apple's devices?
Neither have my best interests in mind. They are out for themselves.

why do you think Apple allows all the predatory games to be sold in their store? Or advertising in the wallet?
Not originally, and the phone sold. Maybe it wouldn't have lasted, we can make that assumption based on where we are today. And when Apple started the store, the rules were laid out in plain english (and other languages I'm sure). 70/30 split. Developers were happy. Customers were happy. The collaboration that came later, made developers billions of dollars, and they packed the conference halls every single WWDC. Until....
the biggest store was cydia and third party store before the AppStore was even launched. Apple opted to let developers provide apps instead dof webapps saved it from becoming a new newton.

Are Developer to be forever gratefully? Developers have been frankly annoyed with Apple and their rules to just make things worse.

Do you think users are happy they can’t signup for Netflix in the app? Do you think Netflix don’t want to have that in the app? They just don’t want to pay 30%. And that’s also why we got most of the terrible freemium apps to try and make more money to escape apples large cut.
What risk? $99 to sell something world wide, instantly? Try starting a business with rent costing you $99 a year. A Mac mini, any keyboard and mouse that will work with it. What's that let's say $1000 once? Risk?
99$? You think it’s free to develop a game? Pay developers, rent and running costs?
What do you think happens if I make 100k the first year but I have 70k in expenses for salaries and 30k goes to Apple? Apples commission is a cost you can’t escape 🤷‍♂️
So they can come up with their own business and stop mooching off Apple's.
They did. They developed their owngames, their own Game Engine and their own store. Now what are they mooching of Apple?
Because you can pick another brand of phone. You're not forced to buy an iPhone. Like them love them or not. You have the choice to purchase any other brand you like. Some of which let you openly do with it as you wish.
Well i already owning my device. And I would rather put pressure on Apple to improve it more go somewhere else that is already worse? Have you seen how hard it is to ”jailbreak” Samsung devices? Most are closed down closer to iOS.

If my steam library worked on Linux I would abandone Windows. If Apple computers could actually use proper GPUs from Nvidia I would still have Mac.
If you’re so “punished” by Apple, why even buy a single product they make?
The ecosystem and all my purchases and hardware is built around Apple since 20010 and is a bit expansive to change. Back then I just jailbroke my devices and purchased mods, and today I just use certificates to continue to do that. And hopefully it will get better so I don’t need to do that.
 
If you want that flexibility, get an Android phone. I like that the Apple ecosystem is designed the way it is - which is one of the reasons why I use Apple devices.
Android option might be going away soon since Google is planning to mandate developer approval for all apps and not just the ones distributed via Google Play Store.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProbablyDylan
Freeloaders! Just like those starving children in Africa! They need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
 
Epic and tim swiney are the worst in terms of attitude and entitlement, I would not knowingly buy anything from them. On the other hand I would agree that Apple could reduce their fees and be fine with like 15-20%. They did change the things they were asked to and now epic is back with more ridiculous demands that will be thrown out of court. Ok, they could be paid outside the App Store but you still gotta pay Apple for the app approval/validation, hosting in the app store, bandwidth etc. It's like a used car lot where you need to pay to use their space or their services. Tim swiney is just egotistical and it drives potential gamers away, not a good look.

Gaming on "open" platforms like windows 11 still sucks big time btw, so many bugs and issues especially with updates and then you have windows itself which continues to be the FIAT of OSs. Can't say I like their world of sideloading openness, you spend a lot of time fixing things rather than gaming. Often it's due to faulty updates, no one checking their subpar work and weak MSDOS based platforms.
 
Apple is no better when talking about "attitude and entitlement".

They are in a league of their own --- always have been.
They're entitled to create their own platform and their rules yes. They also have a right to be proud, they make the best phones and best computers. Epic just has a narcissistic guy raging for the past 5 years achieving practically nothing... Epic just comes from outside the house and tries to bully them into something that will make a mess for everyone, like windows.
 
  • Love
Reactions: marte91
Gaming on "open" platforms like windows 11 still sucks big time btw, so many bugs and issues especially with updates and then you have windows itself which continues to be the FIAT of OSs. Can't say I like their world of sideloading openness, you spend a lot of time fixing things rather than gaming. Often it's due to faulty updates, no one checking their subpar work and weak MSDOS based platforms.

You don't actually think Windows is bad because it lets you install software from wherever, do you?
 
You don't actually think Windows is bad because it lets you install software from wherever, do you?
I think it's a weak OS, based on a weak foundation, DOS, I wish Apple Vision worked with steam and then it would be bye bye ms forever. It could be nice and stable like MacOS which also allowed me to install apps from anywhere, but no, it's the same low grade OS as 20 years ago that'll cease to function just because of an update...
 
Epic and tim swiney are the worst in terms of attitude and entitlement, I would not knowingly buy anything from them. On the other hand I would agree that Apple could reduce their fees and be fine with like 15-20%. They did change the things they were asked to and now epic is back with more ridiculous demands that will be thrown out of court. Ok, they could be paid outside the App Store but you still gotta pay Apple for the app approval/validation, hosting in the app store, bandwidth etc. It's like a used car lot where you need to pay to use their space or their services. Tim swiney is just egotistical and it drives potential gamers away, not a good look.

Gaming on "open" platforms like windows 11 still sucks big time btw, so many bugs and issues especially with updates and then you have windows itself which continues to be the FIAT of OSs. Can't say I like their world of sideloading openness, you spend a lot of time fixing things rather than gaming. Often it's due to faulty updates, no one checking their subpar work and weak MSDOS based platforms.
How about if they don’t want to be hosted in the AppStore or go through an approval and not use apples bandwidth. They want to use their own
 
they can do that on Android, can't they? They can reach 3x the number of people (~ 4.B vs 1.5B) - how is that working out for them?
They are doing it on windows, android and Mac without doing a revenue share . And they want to do it on iOS as well without a revenue share.

Meeting a larger part of the market is just in their interest. If the AppStore is great it will stay irrelevant and we will move on as normal, unless it actually is a realistic threat
 
How about if they don’t want to be hosted in the AppStore or go through an approval and not use apples bandwidth. They want to use their own.
Of course it does. When you pay for the phone you expect it to have a viable app development/distribution infrastructure. Just like with Macs.
No, you have no right to expect anything other than what is explicitly stated in the sales agreement/ToS. Every other argument fails factually.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: marte91 and jz0309
I just miss all the cool 2d treadmill games we used to have.

I'm glad mega run is back by get set games, but I'd like to see more games like that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.