You think the market is just Spotify and Apple?
[doublepost=1513031505][/doublepost]
Disney buying Fox is actually pretty bad news. Let’s not pretend otherwise.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Acquiring Shazam and Says 'Exciting Plans' Are Ahead
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You think the market is just Spotify and Apple?
[doublepost=1513031505][/doublepost]
Disney buying Fox is actually pretty bad news. Let’s not pretend otherwise.
Jim Nabors knew all about Shazam years ago! 
What an idiotic comment to make, whatever your preferences.
They obviously didn't buy Shazam (whatever spelling) for it's capability to ID the audio samples. All of the audio recognition software connect to the same data base in San Francisco to ID the song so they all have to follow the same protocol. Maybe it was something they were working on regarding audio processing but from what I know since the beginning of audio recognition service back in feature phone days they all claimed how you can id the song even in crowded places such as clubs. Who knows.
For example Mixed In Key actually looks for harmonics and it's able to identify the key of the song. However it's very debatable how they do it, they also send the pieces to online data base for comparison.
For example Mixed In Key actually looks for harmonics and it's able to identify the key of the song. However it's very debatable how they do it, they also send the pieces to online data base for comparison.
It's another notch in Apple's bedpost.
(Actually I think I may have said 'notch' there but I think I may have got away with it)
(Actually I think I may have said 'notch' there but I think I may have got away with it)
Maybe they bought it for the image recognition abilities, to aid in their AR efforts.
http://news.shazam.com/pressrelease...-up-a-new-world-of-shazamable-content-1168520
Hmm, does this mean Shazam would soon stop offering options such as:
- Listen in Spotify
- Listen in Google Play Music
Sony has something like that since a long time ago (TrackID) and I use that all the time when I hear a song that I don't remember its name.
Why would you want a service that many people use and like (including me) to die?
Way to stick it to poor people too. Spotify lets you listen to ads and still use it, unlike the competition. So no. Hopefully not a death blow. That would be bad for lots of people. Including Apple Music users really. Competition is good and spurs innovation.
It would be bad for Microsoft Groove users too I guess. I have never used Groove, but apparently MS is shutting it down with the means to port your libraries to Spotify. Generally I don’t care about Groove, except that it is another music service to fall and if Spotify goes, yet another.
I love me some Spotify, it is Apple Music that I personally couldn’t give a rats a— about. I stopped paying for Apple Music years ago.
Strange comment. I don’t subscribe to Spotify but it’s existence keeps other streaming services on their toes. I don’t think I’ve seen this kind of response before. What’s the motivation behind it?
You’ve gotta think that all that money was for something a little more substantial than identifying songs. It can identify music being played, but also shows that are on, maybe what specific part of the show, which commercial is playing. Maybe your phone will proactively serve up places to buy whatever is on the TV. Maybe it’ll passively have IMDB info while you’re watching a show. I’m identifying building blocks and it’ll be interesting to see how they’re put together. Apple’s not buying an app to identify songs. They’re buying a technology to give your devices the power to contextualize the sounds around them in the world.
They are not losing money on free users, since they pay a share of the revenue per user that they actually receive (in case of the free users from the ad revenue). They are not making a profit overall because their marketing and development costs are higher than the income they generate. I'm obviously not privy to their internal strategies, but I believe reaching a critical mass of subscribers is currently more important to them than short-term profits. Their investors apparently believe in their strategy, since they keep giving them money.
"Shazam's machine learning algorithms used to identify audio clips, and its augmented reality feature that enables users to discover content based on pictures captured with its app, could be valuable technologies to Apple."
I'm sure, fits like a glove *rolls eyes*
I wonder how tight it will be.
I'm sure, fits like a glove *rolls eyes*
I wonder how tight it will be.
If the $400M number is accurate, then Apple got this company for a steal !
If Apple's "true" market cap is ~$700B, as I have stated many times, then the true cost to Apple was ONLY ~$316M.
At that price, it's doubtful Shazam had anything of real value.
In other words, NO WAY would they sell out at that price if they truly had something significant !
Even though the general public is blind to have much Apple has gone up this year, an acquiring company's Board usually is NOT ... if they said "Yes" to ~$316M, then it's simply a way to Get Out (of the current situation).
Apple may say great things to come down the road, but they always say it, and until the general public gets wise to their repeated message, they will continue to repeat the message.
Ponzi Scheme, Dog & Pony Show, or Smoke & Mirrors ... many have been Fooled, but NOT all !
As Einstein one stated, 85% of the general population has an IQ less than 85.
If Apple's "true" market cap is ~$700B, as I have stated many times, then the true cost to Apple was ONLY ~$316M.
At that price, it's doubtful Shazam had anything of real value.
In other words, NO WAY would they sell out at that price if they truly had something significant !
Even though the general public is blind to have much Apple has gone up this year, an acquiring company's Board usually is NOT ... if they said "Yes" to ~$316M, then it's simply a way to Get Out (of the current situation).
Apple may say great things to come down the road, but they always say it, and until the general public gets wise to their repeated message, they will continue to repeat the message.
Ponzi Scheme, Dog & Pony Show, or Smoke & Mirrors ... many have been Fooled, but NOT all !
As Einstein one stated, 85% of the general population has an IQ less than 85.
This times 4. I feel like if Apple was interested in the music identification skills of the app, this would have happened long ago. Apple should be thinking ahead...(I’m sure they will implement that as a side note though). Moreover, as so many people have pointed out, it is already integrated into Siri. This is either an attempt to hit Spotify, or as you suggested, looking forward to a world of visual recognition and possibly even shape recognition.
If Shazam can build algorithms to identify music and images, why not 3D objects using the FaceID camera or the 2 cameras on the rear of the phone? Shazam is just complicated pattern recognition. If this acquisition means more than learning what song is playing, then cool. If that’s all it is... meh.
Maybe due to patents. Would it better if they stole the ideas and then ended up being sued by Shazam?
Like many others, I also see Apple integrating it with iOS and doing away with the standalone app. However, I do not think this means Spotify integration will be gone. If Apple does integrate it, it will probably be available to App Developers, which Spotify can utilize.
The only thing I really see going away is Android availability, but it wouldn't be a major loss.
The only thing I really see going away is Android availability, but it wouldn't be a major loss.