The EU should have enforced this globally. We deserve better,
Point taken 👍
I edited that previous post, correcting it to (now) say: "Target isn‘t part of a de facto duopoly for ketchup sales."
...that all "force" me to use the same store for commercially sold apps.
why should I not be allowed to do what u want with my device because other people are stupid? Some people abuse alcohol but it’s still legal because people are responsible for their own choices.
...only for a limited set of "reader apps".Apple has long allowed services to sell their subscriptions outside the app
But there aren't.If there were 10 mobile platforms each with 45 million users the DMA would apply to every single one of them
Classic. Users who aren't good with technology are "stupid."why should I not be allowed to do what u want with my device because other people are stupid? Some people abuse alcohol but it’s still legal because people are responsible for their own choices.
...and so do many consumers.there's many stores available on android. developers just prefer to deploy to play store.
The developer have zero requirement to stay in the store for you. It’s their freedom to have the option to move to alternate stores.nope. didn't stop Mac developers from forcing me to go outside the app for something I paid for.
Agree. As you may have guessed from my signature, I don't subscribe to the idea that mobile app/digital content transactions are very apt comparisons to ketchup. 😉 (...but that's what the cocky Jeremy posited as an analogy)ketchup is an item for sale in the store. so analogy still doesn't quite work. if anything, it should be "Target isn't part of the de facto duopoly for department stores"
Developers have great incentive to stay in Apple's store though (causes it's bundled with iOS and is the biggest store).The developer have zero requirement to stay in the store for you
Has not existed for over a decade. You have full access to a vertically integrated system. This hasn’t changedYes, and in a jurisdiction that cares about free market principles, consumers weigh the options and pick the option that works best for them. In the EU, Big Brother declares "a closed system isn't allowed if too many consumers prefer it".
Warning signs are fine if they are neutral.Warning screens sound like a DMA violation!
And again, MOST USERS AREN'T SOPHISTICATED LIKE WE ARE. My Mother in Law LITERALLY thought she had a "Windows Virus" on her MacBook. She was going to call "Microsoft" but asked me to look at it not because she thought it was sketchy, but because she didn't want to deal with "being put on hold". Had I not been in the next room over, she very likely would have just called. Those sorts of users probably aren't going to be discouraged by a "warning screen" (I thought the term was scare sheet and were no longer allowed), and are the ones the EU is failing.
You're underestimating Tim Apple's lust forApple should seriously consider pulling out of the EU.
Well, you are the consumer, and vote with your wallet, when developers make products that are inferior to you.Except when developers block you from using your Apple account and require you to make an account on their platform that most likely is less secure and less privacy focused.
...only for a limited set of "reader apps".
How do you make a “third party app stores may scam you” warning neutral? You can’t.Has not existed for over a decade. You have full access to a vertically integrated system. This hasn’t changed
Warning signs are fine if they are neutral.
I'd rather say the publicity would have been too negative.Apple pulled out of Russia in 2022 because it was too onerous to do business there.
...whereas Apple decided to comply with the CCP.Google pulled out of China because it decided it would not comply with the CCP’s regulations.
that's not really a platform owner issue. even amazon was able to deploy an android fire tablet with zero play store installed....and so do many consumers.
Which is why you can get a "closed" experience on Android and the Play Store.
Cause all of the important commercial apps are there.
👉 Exactly as it should be.You have to say something like “Apple takes no responsibility for the content of apps on the third-party store.” Hardly a warning or discouragement at all.
exactly my point. I bought my iPhone enjoying the walled garden. I bought apps knowing that these apps are in the walled garden. I expect to continue paying for these apps via App Store. but because of the law, this changes. there was data from when I began investing into iOS and App Store that what I've been doing can suddenly change. apple required developers to stay in store as long as you sell native appsThe developer have zero requirement to stay in the store for you.
I turned off signatures so I don't really see that. oh well.Agree. As you may have guessed from my signature, I don't subscribe to the idea that mobile app/digital content transactions are very apt comparisons to ketchup. 😉 (...but that's what the cocky Jeremy posited as an analogy)
They did! You can read the DMA requirement.The the EU actually wrote straightforward rules instead of vague language and then enforced and clarified through regulatory and the courts, this wouldn't need to happen.
Or, let her and others who prefer it have a closed ecosystem and those who care can use Android with 72% share and everyone gets what works for them.👉 Exactly as it should be.
And you teach your mother in law to not buy anything from anyone else than Apple on her iPhone. Very simple.
Doesn't she use Uber or some kind of transit app though?