Finally. I'm sick and tired of the glare! What were they thinking????
I am glad to see that matte is coming back.
I am glad to see that matte is coming back.
This mentions 'Firewire Beta'... is that in all products. This is something I was not aware of. Thank you for bringing it to light =)
Expresscard and removable battery are much more useful features that need to come back before I'll be in line for a new one.
I find myself calling firewire IEEE1394 without knowing it. Sigh :[ Not that it's wrong, it's just overly technical.
Want any natrium-chloride to go with your fries?
Sodium-chloride.![]()
Now we see the real reason Apple went with glossy screens. They are cheaper. If they have to charge $50 for the anti-glare surface then you know it costs Apple maybe $25 more per screen.
it's just that they do NOT receive the additional anti-glare treatment, that's all.
It is Natrium in EuropeComes from german language, I think, due to it being "invented" there. Let's pay homage for that
Okay, it's clearly past 2200 because these off-topics feel soooo interesting ;D
It is Natrium in EuropeComes from german language, I think
Chill the eff off yourself. There is nothing "anti-Apple" about his response to "BRlawyer", whose rants are so detached from reality that even the hardcore Apple fanboys roll their eyes. Every time Apple farts, he praises them for yet another glorious victory and announces the imminent death of Microsoft. When Apple releases a matte screen option, Microsoft is dead. When they release a minor iPhone OS update, Microsoft dies again. I wonder what the next supposed death blow to Microsoft will be. Probably when Apple corrects some typo on their on their home page. I'm sure that'll crush the company with the 90% market share.
It is Natrium in EuropeComes from german language, I think, due to it being "invented" there. Let's pay homage for that
Okay, it's clearly past 2200 because these off-topics feel soooo interesting ;D
You're only inviting a trainwreck with that regardless.And you continue to take my "MS IS DEAD" comments so seriously...MS as we know it will soon be dead, worry not...but you should take a chill pill instead of presuming that I REALLY mean it every time I use such line in here...it's just my caricatural trademark to remind MS-fanboys that this is a MAC rumors site.
No, they don't; but they do receive additional glossy treatment instead. All LCD panels are covered with something protective, either matte/glossy treatment or glass surface. There is no such thing as a non-treated LCD panel sold to end-user.
You're only inviting a trainwreck with that regardless.
If it costs them more to produce this option, then so be it. $50 is nothing. I would happily pay for it. There are many of us (often accused around here of "whining") with imperfect eyesight for whom a glossy screen is a serious impediment. If you have great eyesight and the glossy screen works for you... wonderful. But having the option, even at a price, is a welcome change.
Not in Apple's case: the anti-glare IS an add-on to the glossy screen.
Thank you for the matte screen option. Thank you for listening and giving professional content developers what we need.
I just hope the matte screen 15" MacBook Pro is available through the Apple stores and resellers when Snow Leopard is released.
Wake me when they offer a matte S-IPS screen on the Macbook Pro. *yawn*