Not having a "budget" Mac has really not done Apple any favours. My friends and family used to say "ooh, a Mac isn't much more than a PC really is it, when you factor in the Windows upgrade and antivirus costs etc". But that argument no longer holds water as most people get free antivirus, and the Mac's entry level price has gradually risen. Now people steer away as the base price is just too high, students especially. IMO, Apple has pushed their prices too high once again, like they did in the mid 1990s. People have again stopped considering them due to the price, like they wouldn't consider a Ferrari when looking in the range of base BMWs.
Take the iMac as comparison. Back when they were 17" white plastic and when they were first made from aluminum at 20", they started at £799. Now they start at £1149. Yes the screen is 1.5" bigger, but we now miss a DVD drive and can't upgrade the RAM. Oh and it's thinner, great, everyone wants that in a desktop. Is that worth an extra £350 which pushes it well over that £999 magic number? I think not.
The MacBooks have had the same treatment. The base plastic ones were £719, now the base Air (which is the spiritual successor of the MB) is £849 with a pokey 11" screen. The same size screen as the old Macbooks will set you back £949.
And of course, there's the lack of updates for a year.
Take the iMac as comparison. Back when they were 17" white plastic and when they were first made from aluminum at 20", they started at £799. Now they start at £1149. Yes the screen is 1.5" bigger, but we now miss a DVD drive and can't upgrade the RAM. Oh and it's thinner, great, everyone wants that in a desktop. Is that worth an extra £350 which pushes it well over that £999 magic number? I think not.
The MacBooks have had the same treatment. The base plastic ones were £719, now the base Air (which is the spiritual successor of the MB) is £849 with a pokey 11" screen. The same size screen as the old Macbooks will set you back £949.
And of course, there's the lack of updates for a year.