The problem is, a lot of people are very attached to having their own private car.
If you are selling cars, that doesn't seem like a problem.
The problem is, a lot of people are very attached to having their own private car.
Why's this so hard to believe? Doesn't Google direct their R&D dollars towards all sort of strange endeavors? And Google doesn't even produce a proper product so to speak.
The problem is that to date, those options suck. Smart TV that isn't very smart, for one. The competition all tripped over themselves trying to out - apple Apple, rather than genuinely try to make a better product. The motivation is all wrong to begin with!
We may have more options, but I don't feel any better is because those options stink for most part.
It's sort of expected for Google to do all sorts of weird things, half of which gets discontinued after a while. Apple has the famous "laser focus", I'm not sure how a car fit into what they do currently to be honest.
in an electric car (and most of their products), battery is very important. That's explains at least a big part of it.
The car industry is 1.9T a year in revenue (Probably around 170B in profits, I'd have to add them up to be sure). There's not much else on earth were there is more money except Telecoms, financials and Energy. Apple will have a toe in energy with batteries and a small stake in financials with Apple pay, but they're NOT getting into Telecoms. That leaves cars out of those top 4.
In a transportation system, you control the whole experience (there's nothing else like it really); that's totally in Apple's wheel house.
Cars have always been more than mere transportation, and with self driving and them becoming more electronic, they are veering closer to consumer electronics than ever before.
What other fields should they get into then, farming, fast food, power plants.
Yes but the transportation part is the entire reason for their existence. A car with an awesome entertainment system that can't transport you is useless. Self driving (autonomous) cars, if they will ever exist doesn't change that fact.
I've seen motorway service stations in the UK. They tend to have fast-food dining and basic shopping. You could easily spend twenty minutes there even if you're not buying petrol. Charging times will get shorter, battery capacities will get higher.
Range really isn't that important unless you're on a long distance drive. You come home and plug it in at night. But your points are well taken. The charging infrastructure is still lacking, but I'm amazed by how many EV charging stations I see in Northern CA and NV. And Tesla is being pretty aggressive with their Superchargers. I think Tesla is close to the tipping point. A few more years and their battery factory will be online in Reno and they will have an extensive network of charging stations.
This is the biggest issue in my mind too. Service. But one could probably say the same thing about Tesla and they've been selling cars for a few years now. Will they still be supporting them in 17 years? Who knows. Leap of faith.
To each his own. I think TVs made a huge improvement from before "I cracked it" to after. Are they perfect? No, but neither is iPhones or iPads.
Same with "smart watches". I'm personally not the least bit interested in one from the other guys or Apple but for those that are, step back to before this rumor hatched and there was barely anything that anyone might call a smart watch. After it hatched but before rumor became reality, a bunch of tech companies took (and continue to take) good cracks at making something and there's plenty of people happy enough with those products to buy them. The real watchmakers of the world generally dismissed it until rumor became reality and now big, capable players have decided to also take their best crack at it. Will any of them deliver a perfect smart watch or even anything better than what Apple will roll out? We don't know for sure (at least those of us who can be objective don't know for sure- those that can't be objective already know that Apple's watch will be the finest, near-perfect watch ever made). What we do know is that with so many brains in so many companies working on it, even if Apple rolls out the best incarnation, there should be a number of innovations in others to motivate Apple toward improving beyond the usual "thinner", "lighter", etc.
This iCar? It's the same again. Whether Apple actually brings one to market or not, just the idea they might should scare others already making cars into (hopefully) stepping up their own games. If- like the TV- Apple never rolls out an iCar, we consumers can still win by the rest of the pack bringing innovations to try to combat something that might come out of Apple. Will anyones- including Apples- be perfect? No. But very likely, many will be better than they are now.
And that was the point. I actually hope that Apple will really take a cut at an iCar. But even if they don't, the consolation prize should be that the other car makers will try harder... and the next car that we buy will likely be better-to-much-better than the one we have now.
MG Siegler says it would be foolish for Apple to not be looking at the automotive industry. That at $182B in revenues the only things that can really move the needle are telecom, energy, banking or automotive. I can't see Apple becoming a telecom or energy company so that leaves banking and automotive. I think those are two areas Apple is definitely exploring Pay and CarPlay are just the tip of the iceberg. And with that story that Toyota has no plans to integrate CarPlay anytime soon it seems clear that Apple owning the dash for existing car companies isn't going to happen or would be very difficult and probably provide a very fragmented and less than great customer experience.
https://medium.com/five-hundred-wor...if-apple-wasn-t-working-on-a-car-52630793cc96