Nah....
This argument has been around for quite a while. I first heard it when people started carrying cellphones and pagers.
In reality, the technology is only as "good" or "restraining" as you choose to apply it. Take Twitter, for example. Sure, there are people who become addicted to monitoring a bunch of people's pointless status messages, and sending out "updates" about things of little importance to anyone else. But that's not because Twitter is a useless concept, or was *designed* to waste people's time and get them addicted to reading and regurgitating nonsense. I recently saw an excellent use of Twitter by a recruiter. You subscribe to her Twitter feed, and then you're instantly notified if she has a new I.T. related job opening you might want to apply for. Other companies have used it to shoot out special "electronic coupon" offers for specific products or services you already use or have an interest in. (I like that idea better than the SMS messaging version of the same thing some of them have been doing. Why use up my limited number of monthly text messages for that stuff when a service like Twitter is free?)
This argument has been around for quite a while. I first heard it when people started carrying cellphones and pagers.
In reality, the technology is only as "good" or "restraining" as you choose to apply it. Take Twitter, for example. Sure, there are people who become addicted to monitoring a bunch of people's pointless status messages, and sending out "updates" about things of little importance to anyone else. But that's not because Twitter is a useless concept, or was *designed* to waste people's time and get them addicted to reading and regurgitating nonsense. I recently saw an excellent use of Twitter by a recruiter. You subscribe to her Twitter feed, and then you're instantly notified if she has a new I.T. related job opening you might want to apply for. Other companies have used it to shoot out special "electronic coupon" offers for specific products or services you already use or have an interest in. (I like that idea better than the SMS messaging version of the same thing some of them have been doing. Why use up my limited number of monthly text messages for that stuff when a service like Twitter is free?)
Just a question, not trying to stir anything up. I have an iPhone and am checking my email and sports scores and lots of other things when I am out and about. But instead of more free, I am in a way more bound. Those things would still be there when I returned home. Sure, using my iPhone to look up numbers, map something, etc, is great when I am out, but for a lot of people it turns into an obsession with being connected. Look at the success of twitter, which IMHO is just ridiculous. Are we more free, or more enslaved by having the internet wherever we go.
The only two reasons I can see for having a 3G model is if you take it to a friend or family members house who does not have internet or wifi and you can't get on there but want to use it or likewise for traveling.
The other would be so my wife or I could use it in the car while driving somewhere.
In either instance an iPhone, though less fun on a smaller screen would suffice, so I'm not sure I can really see a need for the 3G model and it's data costs. Unless you don't already have an iPhone or you simply have that much cash to toss around.