The fact that Leica is the camera manufacture for Xiaomi is impressive.
It's very much a camera that can work as a phone if you need it to.
The fact that Leica is the camera manufacture for Xiaomi is impressive.
I guess if you count good-natured ribbing as mocking, then sure. I mean they aren't mocking in the sense of derisive belittling. The ads were not mean-spirited or malicious (not saying these Xiaomi ads are that either [just to remind of the context of this discussion]). They were intended to be funny and clever, even satirical caricature, but never malicious. They were not grossly incorrect either, although caricature.They did mock PCs though. They just paid professional comedians to do the mocking, so it was glossier, more polished mocking. It's not the case of Apple having that much of the higher ground here.
Maybe try not being so cynical?But, outside of India, people are following the story, as on here. The cynic in me would very much say Apple and Samsung are very happy that their threatening legal action has pushed this story international, because it's publicity. Extending that, part of the decision to threaten legal action or not threaten legal action would be factoring in the publicity the manufactured drama creates.
It's very much a camera that can work as a phone if you need it to.
I guess if you count good-natured ribbing as mocking, then sure. I mean they aren't mocking in the sense of derisive belittling. The ads were not mean-spirited or malicious (not saying these Xiaomi ads are that either [just to remind of the context of this discussion]). They were intended to be funny and clever, even satirical caricature, but never malicious. They were not grossly incorrect either, although caricature.
Samsung flexing useless things…
I don't disagree a DSLR is better. The nice thing about getting something like this is I have a choice whether I want to carry 20lbs of camera and lenses and batteries everywhere I go or carry a phone and get the best possible pictures I can.Why the hell would you buy something like that?
If you want a camera, buy a Camera. Not a thing pretending to be one.
Have to stop pretending smartphones are cameras. There's absolutely no substitute for an actual chunk of glass in front of the sensor whatever they tell you.
No, it's not. It's an affront to both cameras and phones.
Why the hell would you buy something like that?
If you want a camera, buy a Camera. Not a thing pretending to be one.
Have to stop pretending smartphones are cameras. There's absolutely no substitute for an actual chunk of glass in front of the sensor whatever they tell you.
If making the same phone every year brings in lots and lot of revenue .........Stop making the same phone every year then 😅, you stopped innovating!
This is you, apparently:No, it's not. It's an affront to both cameras and phones.
Xiaomi makes way more than just phones. They’ve built a whole ecosystem of products, and some of them are pretty surprising or interesting:
- Smartphones & Tablets – Their main business, known for good specs at lower prices.
- Smart Home Gear – Air purifiers, robot vacuums, smart bulbs, smart locks, cameras, and even refrigerators.
- Wearables – Mi Band (fitness tracker), smartwatches, smart rings (recently announced).
- Personal Mobility – Electric scooters, electric bikes, and even concept electric cars (SU7 sedan).
- TVs & Streaming Boxes – Mi TV, Mi Box, projectors.
- Laptops & PC Accessories – Lightweight laptops, PC monitors, mechanical keyboards.
- Kitchen Appliances – Rice cookers, smart kettles, blenders, induction cooktops.
- Health Gadgets – Smart scales, blood pressure monitors, thermometers, water purifiers.
- Lifestyle Items – Backpacks, suitcases, pens, umbrellas, and even pillows.
- Fun & Quirky Stuff –
- A talking toothbrush with a screen.
- Smart fish tank that auto-feeds and regulates water.
- Smart pet feeder & fountain for cats and dogs.
- Smart trash can that seals and replaces the bag.
- A pocket-sized photo printer.
Xiaomi’s strategy is basically: if it has a circuit board, we’ll make it.
1 and a half years, 42 months4 years 12 months. isn't that just 5 years? 😂
No, it's not. It's an affront to both cameras and phones.
The legal problem is they are not doing a direct comparison. They are stating their own specs, but not Apple’s. They are comparing specs to aesthetics.I see nothing wrong with the Ads. They are not lying, they are just stating specs. The two things that stand out here are:
A) They are doing a direct comparison to a competitor, that typically doesn’t work out well for the company. […]
Except when the company is called Apple. Then it's "brilliant" and "funny" and "the best advertising campaign ever."I always think disparaging ads feel like desperation and make me actively dislike that company more.
Meh. They're highlighting their own specs, not doing a scientific breakdown comparison. Apple and Samsung seem like spoiled kids throwing a tantrum here.The legal problem is they are not doing a direct comparison. They are stating their own specs, but not Apple’s. They are comparing specs to aesthetics.
The message is “we have impressive specs, Apple has cute aesthetics” — however, while the audience can compare the aesthetics, they can’t compare the specs.