So it´s official now, Apple giving up on Thunderbolt?
I believe future versions of USB type C will support Thunderbolt. I bet next years versions with include thunderbolt compatibility with the USB type C connector.
So it´s official now, Apple giving up on Thunderbolt?
There's a lot that looks like a compromise...
But that re-designed trackpad with haptic feedback? I nutted.
I'm confused. If this isn't replacing the MacBook Air and it's THINNER than the Air, then doesn't the Air kind of lose its meaning?
Just 1 USB-C, and with that no magsafe... very expencive just for getting less...![]()
Sealed the deal on the Retina 13" MacBook Pro for me.
I'm confused. If this isn't replacing the MacBook Air and it's THINNER than the Air, then doesn't the Air kind of lose its meaning?
The post that kills me the most is "No thanks." I can't imagine a day during which I'd seek out a VW (car) forum and comment on the new Passat that I don't favor. I don't understand why. (By the way, that's totally different than running why the new MB's features don't meet your needs, which I find interesting and informative.)
Well that was a surprise, but a dissapointment at the same time.
Starting 1299$![]()
So is your comment because you are taking them too literally. Read their comment as "any activity which maxes out the CPU".
So does the trackpad click or vibrate...or both?![]()
The problem is the adapters are ridiculously overpriced. Like the $79 one earlier in this thread.
If they charged $15 for those, or at least threw one in with the machine, that'd be one thing. But they squeeze customers on the adapters, making the whole package less attractive.
So, if you want to connect more than one USB device, you have to buy that, plus a USB hub. You're looking at a hundred bucks on top of the price of the laptop to actually make it usable. What a joke. This thing is like a glorified and overpriced iPad.
I'll stick with a regular MacBook for my next update and hope that Apple doesn't go down the USB-C road for those in the next major update.
I wish Apple would stop trying to make everything thinner. Some of us are not weaklings who are capable of carrying a 4 pound, .75 inch thick laptop and prefer functionality over thinness and lightness.
You'll have to forgive me but I can't seem to understand where this device fits in. Don't get me wrong, it looks great and from an engineering perspective it's very advanced but I personally don't think it deserves to be its own product.
Think about it:
1. Spec wise and design wise, it's comparable to the Macbook Air. In fact, during the conference I thought it was going to be a new retina Macbook air.
2. Price wise, it's exactly the same amount as the 13" Macbook Pro (which is more powerful, has great battery life, a bigger screen and is still very light and thin).
Why didn't they just call it the Macbook Air Retina and have it replace the current retina line? Other than style, I'm just not sure what the appeal of this new laptop is especially when you can get a much better laptop in the 13" Macbook pro for the exact same price (or you can save a bit of money on the Macbook air and still get similar performance).
You'll have to forgive me but I can't seem to understand where this device fits in. Don't get me wrong, it looks great and from an engineering perspective it's very advanced but I personally don't think it deserves to be its own product.
Think about it:
1. Spec wise and design wise, it's comparable to the Macbook Air. In fact, during the conference I thought it was going to be a new retina Macbook air.
2. Price wise, it's exactly the same amount as the 13" Macbook Pro (which is more powerful, has great battery life, a bigger screen and is still very light and thin).
Why didn't they just call it the Macbook Air Retina and have it replace the current retina line? Other than style, I'm just not sure what the appeal of this new laptop is especially when you can get a much better laptop in the 13" Macbook pro for the exact same price (or you can save a bit of money on the Macbook air and still get similar performance).
Again, don't get me wrong, it looks fantastic, but the price to performance ratio is not adding up.