terrible move... this will go down in corporate history as the blunder that it is.
![]()
This has NOTHING to do with their equipment. Why do people keep thinking Apple wants BEATS for their gear?
This was about Iovine and BEATS/DRE was part of the package deal.
terrible move... this will go down in corporate history as the blunder that it is.
![]()
The only thing I can think of is that they couldn't get Iovine unless they bought the bathwater too. I just can't see Iovine or Dre worth $3 billion. At least they'll get that back in Beats revenue in the next year or two.
You don't know what you're talking about. You don't know what apple plans to do with the company or talent they acquired or what potential future products they have access to. You don't like their headphones so it's a bad deal for apple? They know what they are doing.
It would be funny if in a couple of days Samsung announced a great deal acquiring one of the respected headphone manufacturers.
Does anyone know about how a business runs?
Facebook paid $1bn for WhatsApp.
$3bn for a profitable company is nothing... plus the streaming technology and knowledge that Iovine and Dr Dre can bring to Apple all makes sense.
Forget about the background and the product, they built a billion dollar business in 8years!
I have Monster Beats that I use on the plane when I want to see a crappy movie played on the seat in front of me. I have PSB when I listen to lossless on my home iMac and Ultimate Ears when I listen to lossless on my travel MBP.
The quality difference is enormous, the price isn't. I know what quality can buy when you want to pay a lot of money for music listening.
Beats aren't in that category. Hence, they have no place at Apple imho.
SJ doesnt matter now, what should matter is logic and apple's vision. If apple felt Beats is an essential part of its future path and which also means that to its board of directors approve (who also agreed to hand over the $3Bil) then we just have to wait and see wants instore for the rest of us.