Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
haha come on buddy. it is not a $50 saving. If you're doing real work and need 128GB of RAM, that would be $2600. The OWC price for 128GB? $599. Apple are charging 4.3x more. And OWC RAM is certified to work on Macs.
Even OWC is a ripoff. You can use $120 32gb DDR4 2666 Sodimms to get to the 128gb of RAM. Apple is paying less than that. Shows you how much Apple milks us on the upgrades

Sadly with the T2 chip, SSD is likely soldered in on these new imacs which is probably the only advantage with the previous models which allow you to use an adapter and use industry standard M.2 NVME SSD's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: filmgirl and RyanXM
Still the same tired old design.
No 802.11ax.
Comet lake which is just rehashed Skylake from 2016.
Fusion drive is still an option for some bizarre reason.

At least they finally did something about the webcam and 10GbE.

I see SSD now standard across the board. Can you downgrade to Fusion drive, or "upgrade" for more storage? I didn't get into the BTO weeds. Much needed upgrade, but so obviously the last of the Intel iMacs.
 
I'd be interested in figuring out what would be the best "bridge" 27" iMac for the next 3-5 years, when we're hopefully into our 2nd or 3rd generation of Apple silicon iMacs. I have a late 2013 15" MacBook Pro, and I'm not sure it's going to last another 3-5 years. I have modest computing needs (photo editing and light video editing, and the standard email browsing, etc.), so I'm thinking of either the middle model and bumping up the SSD to 1TB, or the same with the highest model. Better processor and graphics card, which may not that critical to me, but the price difference is only $200. Or just wait it out, but I want a larger screen sooner rather than later, and the larger iMacs may be one of the last to update to the new processors. Bezels do not bother me!
 
I see SSD now standard across the board. Can you downgrade to Fusion drive, or "upgrade" for more storage? I didn't get into the BTO weeds. Much needed upgrade, but so obviously the last of the Intel iMacs.
With the T2 chip and no HDD available, I'm pretty sure fusion is out and so is the ability to upgrade the SSDs.
 
I need the QUIETEST and yet fastest iMac possible. 8-core i7 or 10-core i9? I do pro audio and more cores usually does not help.

And which Radeon Pro? And would the nano-glass help with cooling, I wonder....
 

Attachments

  • 050DB2EC-0A4B-441A-AA5D-CBC7CBA5440A.jpeg
    050DB2EC-0A4B-441A-AA5D-CBC7CBA5440A.jpeg
    467.9 KB · Views: 103
Even OWC is a ripoff. You can use $120 32gb DDR4 2666 Sodimms to get to the 128gb of RAM. Apple is paying less than that. Shows you how much Apple milks us on the upgrades

Sadly with the T2 chip, SSD is likely soldered in on these new imacs which is probably the only advantage with the previous models which allow you to use an adapter and use industry standard M.2 NVME SSD's.

The SSD is more than likely using the same ones as the iMac Pro and Mac Pro. Flash only modules with the T2 handling the controller responsibilities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
AIOs from other vendors look nicer these days. The HP one looks great, even though it's obviously plastic.

I wonder if the problem is that all the designers have gone digital and don't know how to design physical things anymore. I mean, there was a time when Apple pioneered whole new ways of making and forming aluminum - which was considered impractical before Apple started mass-produced aluminum Macs.

Apple makes so few things these days that they're losing their touch. You have to practice making things.
 
Why do so many people feel they “need” a new design? I spend a lot of time staring at my screen but zero time staring at the bezels. The current design is perfectly adequate.

From a marketing viewpoint, it wouldn’t make sense for Apple to spend a lot of money on a new design for a product line that is nearing end of life (This may very well be the last Intel desktop Apple introduces.) It would make more sense to save the new design concepts for Apple Silicon machines.
 
I need the QUIETEST and yet fastest iMac possible. 8-core i7 or 10-core i9? I do pro audio and more cores usually does not help.

And which Radeon Pro? And would the nano-glass help with cooling, I wonder....

The 8-core i7 will likely run cooler, at least under full load, then the 10-core i9.

As for GPU, I would go with the base 5500 since it will run the coolest and audio apps generally don't call on the GPU, I am guessing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ambientdaw
I wonder if they have done anything with the cooling. 10th gen i9 with the 5700 XT is gonna be pretty toasty.
Given the cost of with that option you almost expect variations to how the heat cooling is now being done, along with GPU’s. Waiting for iFixIt teardown to view internal changes, even if it is using the same enclosure. :)
 
I wonder if they have done anything with the cooling. 10th gen i9 with the 5700 XT is gonna be pretty toasty.
The i9 is custom and locked at a 95w TDP and Radeon Pro GPUs are always slightly down-clocked from their non-Pro cousins. Eliminating spinning rust also reduces inside temps as well. We’ll see if Apple engineers added any additional cooling for this model as they had to completely rework the motherboard to accommodate the T2 and the NAND module sockets for the SSD.
 
Baseline 27" + DIY RAM upgrade + thunderbolt external SSD looks like the best option to me. That is if you absolutely need one.
 
Press Release I saw earlier...




I'm curious about the speakers and mic upgrade. Primarily just because I wonder what they consider studio quality mics. The nano texture display option sounds interesting too, but I'm holding out for the apple designed chips.
I’m guessing it’s the same new high quality mics from the 2019/2020 MacBook Pros they were crowing about when those machines launched.
 
I wasn't expecting a new design, but budget graphics, cheapskate memory and bare minimum SSD seems a bit tight.
You guys are really good at continuously moving the bar on what these things actually are. I love "minimum SSD" especially.

Why is that the people who the BTO models are meant for always want themselves to be a base model user?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MisterK
I was really hoping for a redesign. Some commenters are saying this design is from 2012 but I would go back to 2009 (since the computer is rarely viewed from the side and it's identical to the 2009 one from the front). I'm in the market for a new desktop, but I'm gonna feel dumb if the Apple Processor iMac with touchscreen comes out later this year.
 
You guys are really good at continuously moving the bar on what these things actually are. I love "minimum SSD" especially.

Why is that the people who the BTO models are meant for always want themselves to be a base model user?

Because a Windows 10 sucks, but you can build yourself anything your heart desires and macOS is way better (no matter how much this crew denies it), but Apple doesn’t cater to their whims and it pisses them off, so they come here to whine about it every time Apple updates their Mac hardware. Every. Single. Time.

They’re still crying about USB-A, SD Card, MagSafe and a lighted Apple logo nearly FOUR years later at the same fevered pitch. Four years. Cannot imagine how many have restraining orders against them from ex-girlfriends/ex-wives.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.