While I am somewhat desperate to replace my 16" MBP (which I despise), this update is 'meh'. I will wait for ARM iMac.
Right. "Laughable".
I just priced a "laughable upgrade" for my 2017 5K iMac. I could get 8 cores (instead of 4), same 32 GB memory, same 1 TB storage, for $1000 less than I spent in 2017.
You really you know you're talking about.
Yep, the more powerful lineup will be the last to move toWell, no one can buy Apple Silicon iMac soon...it won't be out until late 2020 or early 2021.
So this Intel Mac is ideal. But I think you'll be surprised to see how many and how popular Apple Silicon iMacs (and other Macs) will be if the speed gains are real. Add a whole new form factor with smaller bezels and it will fly off the shelves.
People will complain if Apple does not update its specs to industry standards and people will complain if the update is incremental and not "revolutionary".
This was a very predictable update in light of the ARM announcement, and will be welcome by anyone currently looking to purchase an iMac. They get more for less.
Why would Apple redesign an Intel iMac when they‘re moving to their own chips. Seems logical they’d save the redesign/wow factor for new Macs with Apple Silicon.
At least if you need a new IMac you can get a pretty capable machine, just watch the options as the price goes up fairly quickly.This might actually be the machine to buy if you want one of the last Intel Macs that can natively run x86 code. I'm going to be seriously mulling over this.
Wow! Jon P. was right! Good job.
Same embarrassingly dated design? Jikes, even my Dell desktop at work from 4 years ago has less bezel
Yes cuz I have to look at it all day thinking damn this thing looks like an old tube tv
Yes cuz I have to look at it all day thinking damn this thing looks like an old tube tv
Let’s hope some benchmarks of the 5500XT versus the 5700XT are in somebody’s pipeline.
Let’s hope some benchmarks of the 5500XT versus the 5700XT are in somebody’s pipeline.
"Apple(R) today announced a major update to its 27-inch iMac(R). By far the most powerful and capable iMac ever"
Epic troll. With the offered base amount of RAM, it can't even handle Kubernetes alone.
haha come on buddy. it is not a $50 saving. If you're doing real work and need 128GB of RAM, that would be $2600. The OWC price for 128GB? $599. Apple are charging 4.3x more. And OWC RAM is certified to work on Macs.Why are people still clinging to this? You need really need to save, what, $50? Buying cheap 3d party RAM for your $3000 iMac? Come on people. Just buy what you need. It's an investment for work (supposedly).
Wow! Jon P. was right! Good job.
I don’t see HDR being mentioned, I thought because of the T2 inclusion it would be.
I often see $300+ up charges for 16GB if RAM for the Lenovo’s I order for work (obviously I just upgrade them myself). This is a standard practice in the industry.haha come on buddy. it is not a $50 saving. If you're doing real work and need 128GB of RAM, that would be $2600. The OWC price for 128GB? $599. Apple are charging 4.3x more. And OWC RAM is certified to work on Macs.
Show me the incredible Apple Silicon GPU performance before dancing about Intel demise. But I won’t argue, it could have been a new design, at least with internal heat dissipation like the pro model, that’s my first question with all the new parts?Possibly! Last Mac Intel people!
Still the same tired old design.
...