Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I expect the Mac Pro, and Apple in general, to be a leader. Now, with a price hike, it's just catching up.

I believe both the single quad-core CPU and dual quad-core CPU configurations are cheaper now then they were with the previous model. And the CPUs themselves are now both faster in core clockspeed as well as FSB speeds.

The nVidia 7300GT is claimed to be a better gaming card, but the ATI 2600XT supports Direct X 10 (yes, BFD in Leopard) as well as hardware x.264 acceleration which should help video content (especially HD video content) generation and playback.

And a Mac Pro is cheaper then an HP or a Dell or an IBM with identical or similar specifications based on the reports of the folks who have compared configurations.


Nothing I don't like, nothing I really like either. And that's the problem for me: brand new Mac Pros shouldn't be lukewarm. They should be smoking hot. This one clearly isn't.

Well they could have gone SAS for the HDD (my HP xw8400 supports it) and the 8800 Ultra (the Quadro is already top-of-the-line) and added Sony's new Blu-Ray player (or a Blu-Ray burner), but honestly...you can likely add them all (maybe not the 8800GT) yourself via third-party channels for less money and likely quicker shipping (notice the delay to get the 8800GT card).
 
What, no bake-off?

Like many here, I was hoping to see a Photoshop "bake-off" in the tradition of yesteryear's Macworld. After toasting the competition, a BluRay cappuccino served with an iSight enabled wide(r than) 30" (LED) Cinema Display with much faster response time would have been most satisfying.

Alas, Macworld 2008 will likely focus on more cute and fragile consumer orientated machines. Perhaps after this rollout and iPhone version 2 (later this year), Apple will have time to place more emphasis on the Mac Pro line. This speed bump is merely a (rather decent) placeholder.
:apple:
 
Looks like a solid upgrade!

First time I've seen a graphics card cost as much as the whole computer! :eek:

But then, I normally am not cruising in Mac Pro territory.....
 
For all the heat the G5 takes these days, I have to say the Intel chips aren't blowing my socks off... According to Apple's own performance page, the Mac Pro struggles to double the performance of the Quad G5 with twice as many cores and 30% higher clock rate per core, 6MB of cache per core and 2 years of added experience.

Going Intel may have had other advantages, but the G5 still holds its own performance wise.

Yeah people that call the G5 a dinosaur are...well...not smart...

Kinda weird looking at the benchmarks, a $4k Octo-Mac Pro in 2008 is barely 2x faster than the Quad G5 in 2005 that retailed for $3299(If i remember correctly).

Did the Quad G5's have liquid cooling in em?
 
Can you please post a link to where you see a price hike?

Hello,

Can't find hard data, but I'm sure the standard (not base) Mac Pro first generation was 2499$ The standard Mac Pro 2nd gen is now 2799$. (Only found evidence of this in old Macrumors threads!)

That's 300$ more for the standard config. Sure you can lower it, but you could also lower the original Mac Pro.

Maybe, as someone suggested, they're making room for an intermediate. Don't think so, but 300$ is significant nonetheless.

Nisaea
 
Nice upgrade!

For those who are arguing that there is little to this beyond a new processor, here's what barefeats.com posted on their website today:

"January 8th, 2008 -- Analysis of NEW Mac Pros with "Penryn based Xeon" CPU: This is a significant upgrade with faster core clock, faster FSB, faster memory, bigger cache. And the GPU choices have been improved and it now sports two x16 PCI-Express slots. Storage options include 1TB 3G SATA and 300G SAS 15K. We'll have full performance comparison results for old and new 8-core systems as soon as we can get our hands on the new model."
 
Interesting...

I just found something on the dutch apple online store.
It seems there are more grapics cards options comming for the new mac pro :)

They mention the ATI Radeon HD 3870 in the "learn more" window

Belgian Apple Store

Pay attention to the last sentences...

ATI Radeon HD 3870
Als u met bewegende beelden, animatie of 3D-ontwerp en visualisatie werkt, is de snellere ATI Radeon HD 3870 met 512 MB speciaal GDDR4-geheugen waarschijnlijk precies wat u nodig hebt. Op de twee dual-link DVI-poorten kunt u tegelijkertijd twee 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Displays aansluiten, zodat u een extra groot werkoppervlak hebt. We need performance numbers to position this card relative to 8800 GT. Also, a PCIe2.0 card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
We need performance numbers to position this card relative to 3870. Also, a PCIe2.0 card.
 

Attachments

  • Afbeelding 1.png
    Afbeelding 1.png
    127.5 KB · Views: 129
Yes, but they're shipping those boring beige boxes they get for pennies from the Taiwanese. Apple is using those cutting edge Al boxes they're paying serious money for. :D

no matter what they are still all screwed together in china by quanta or asus (laptops mostly) ...
and it's really hard to find those beige boxes nowadays ;)

Seriously, I do understand your point. Which is why I think Apple can be a bit more ambitious within their current form factors in terms of product differentiation.
personally i would say less model types (4 different imacs ?) but more different form factors ... i find it less confusing to have 2 different imacs + 1 midtower + 1 mac mini than to have the current 4 imac and 2 mac mini

And I do understand the desire to eliminate desktop clutter. An iMac with two or three external HDDs hanging off it certainly defeats the aesthetic. :D I use NAS storage because I want my MacBook to access it, as well, so I am fortunate in that aspect.

don't forget the powercables as well ;)
as a mini user i have been looking at external drives for quite some time but everytime i think "where the hell do i put that thing" and then think that the money might more more useful spent on a new computer

As to the video cards, why nVidia or Apple can't write a unified driver that works with all their cards like they do with Windows annoys and confuses me.

i don't know i find it of course rather ironic that apple has more driver problems than windows in that regard ... after all nvidia makes really kickass drivers for linux ... my guess is that apples artificial restriction on using of the shelf cards (bigger apple specific firm ware) might be the problem here ... after all they want to get their premium for it
 
For all the heat the G5 takes these days, I have to say the Intel chips aren't blowing my socks off... According to Apple's own performance page, the Mac Pro struggles to double the performance of the Quad G5 with twice as many cores and 30% higher clock rate per core, 6MB of cache per core and 2 years of added experience.

Going Intel may have had other advantages, but the G5 still holds its own performance wise.

A few points:
  1. The G5 was at close to it's performance limit.
  2. Intel has traded raw clock-speed for better efficiency. Like the PowerPC, Netburst-based P4s needed more and more exotic cooling to keep them from melting so there was a limit to how far they could be pushed and the performance that could be extracted from them. We would not have P4s or G5s twice as powerful today.
  3. More cores and faster speeds will continue to improve performance.
  4. As multi-threading and multi-core applications become more common, performance will improve without any need for a speed increase. Just as Native OS-X binaries run faster on Intel Macs then PowerPC binaries with no additional hardware changes.
  5. Today's Mac Pro is still twice as fast as yesterday's G5 Power Mac. ;)
 
Congratulations for all those who waited so patiently for what seems like amost a year. Really happy for you guys :)

My 2.66 Ghz dual is chugging along just fine. All my my hd bays and RAM slots are filled, so the only thing I might be upgrading in the next few months is the video card (now that there are more choices), assuming I'll need it for blue ray (oh yeah, that too).
 
Boom

It's a great machine i've got quadro love 1.5 GB vram BOOM all my big models will rotate without wire framing just like butter BOOM now i need to know will this baby take two quadros ? i notice it's not on the bto options 3GB of vram thats BOOOOOM !
(ps i ain't no gamer thats for losers sitting in box rooms with the curtains pulled shut) for 3d modelling and rendering this is the dogs, okay one more BOOM !
 
On days like this, I wish Multimedia was around to give us some analysis. :(

But, nonetheless, bring on the Mac Pros!

This is what Multi had us waiting for. S/S motherboard with SSE4, 8 cores, 1600MHz FSB. Just go back and read his old posts and you will see what he thinks of this. He was actually expecting some chips at the lower end with a 1333MHz bus (the 2.83 quad to replace the 2.66 dually for example), so this is actually a small bump-up from his predictions, in part probably due to the fact that they waited until January. Multi's predictions were pretty much verified by the release today.
 
Well, my Quad 2.66 that I've been enjoying since April is plenty fast for me.

The only thing I'd be interested in is the NVida GPU. Anyone know if that supports hardware h.264 encoding?
 
For those who are arguing that there is little to this beyond a new processor

I haven't read every post here, but my argument isn't really about specifics. Of course it's better nearly all the way around. That was expected after 500+ days of utter stillness. Price-performance is better. Sure.

But where are the bells and whistles?

And apparently Apple doesn't have any special relationship with IBM with regards to getting the first Penryns. Not only was the old Mac Pro very long in the tooth, but it's at least 2 months late, judging by most of the posters on this board. Look back at what ppl were saying in Octobre/November!

Nisaea
 
Essentially, a smart consumer would configure with 8-Core 3.2GHz then purchase ALL other options individually? How much could one save?

EDIT: I started with the RAM and obtained CRUCIAL 2GB sticks for $50/each - comes with 2GB - add 3 x 2GB = $1500 APPLE .... $150 ME
EDIT2: 2ND Drive - 500GB Hitachi 7200RPM 500GB = $250 APPLE .... $151 ME
EDIT3: GeForce 8800GT 512MB = $400 APPLE ... $260 ME

Without going further obviously the most obvious choice is the RAM with the others being negligible (you would have to sell the factory graphics card :\ )

Could you link to that RAM please?
I can't find the kind that Apple ships:
"800MHz DDR2 ECC fully buffered DIMM (FB-DIMM) memory"

What other kinds can this machine take..? And does it matter much with the clockspeed and EEC, fully buffered etc..?
 
If I'm doing work in Logic Studio, Final Cut Pro and Motion:

8 cores with standard video card
4 cores with 8800 GT?

I'm planning on bumping to 4g of ram anyway, so I have to pick between one of those configs as they're roughly the same price..

For Logic, the 8 cores will definitely give you a big boost, while the video card will make zero difference. I suspect the same will be true for FCP, but motion may benefit from the video card...but someone who is more of a video expert should address that.

Computer gaming is a real market that Apple has chosen to leave to the PC.

Is it? I was under the impression that the computer game market isn't all that big and shrinking all the time due to consoles (which it can't really compete with). It would be nice if apple shipped some machines that appealed to gamers, but I don't think it would result in that big a boost in sales.

And yet the new Mac Pro will crush a Power Macintosh G4 in every performance category. And a Mac Pro is cheaper then the majority of equivalent workstations from the major Windows PC suppliers.

That's all true, but the MP is overkill for many users. There are users who want expandability (and choice of monitor) but only need power similar to the high end iMac. People want the equivalent of a midsize pickup truck, but apple only offers an 18 wheel semi in that category.

I'd agree that apple could add a MP model that is even more stripped down and cheaper, but they still couldn't reach the price point people are looking for. They could be much more competitive on the midrange with a machine running Core Duo or Core Quad, much cheaper ram, probably cheaper mobo, smaller/simpler case.

And I think apple should seriously consider adding a midrange tower AND adding a BTO quad core option to the iMac, I don't see why the two are mutually exclusive.

I expect the Mac Pro, and Apple in general, to be a leader. Now, with a price hike, it's just catching up.

Nothing I don't like, nothing I really like either. And that's the problem for me: brand new Mac Pros shouldn't be lukewarm. They should be smoking hot. This one clearly isn't.

Nisaea

And again, what exactly are you missing that would make you consider this box a leader? If you're going to complain that it's not good enough, you should be able to point to specific shortcomings.

What is it missing? And who is making a box that has those things that you wish this box had?

And again, it's not really a price hike for most models, the lowest price is exactly the same while it's now hundreds cheaper to get an 8 core than it was yesterday.

Going Intel may have had other advantages, but the G5 still holds its own performance wise.

Holds its own? Didn't you just say the new MP almost doubles what the quad G5 did? Or is your point that a hypothetical nonexistent 8 core G5 with faster clock rate would keep up with the xeons?
 
The 2.5GHz unit required liquid cooling. The 1.8GHz and 2.0GHz units could be cooled with (lots of) air.

Yeah I remember now.

Back in June when I was shopping for a Mac I was either getting the Dual Core 2.3 G5, a Quad G5 or the Mac Pro.

I didn't trust anything with liquid cooling, and my parents wanted me to get a new machine...so I got the Mac Pro and it has over-exceeded my needs...I think a G5 would have sufficed.
 
Multi's predictions were pretty much verified by the release today.

Of course he was stupefyingly off when it comes to time scale... Wait long enough and his predictions were sure to come true in the end :)

Those who new better bought their Mac Pro a year or so ago :D
 
I'd agree that apple could add a MP model that is even more stripped down and cheaper, but they still couldn't reach the price point people are looking for. They could be much more competitive on the midrange with a machine running Core Duo or Core Quad, much cheaper ram, probably cheaper mobo, smaller/simpler case.

And I think apple should seriously consider adding a midrange tower AND adding a BTO quad core option to the iMac, I don't see why the two are mutually exclusive.

Aye. The advantage of a quad-core iMac is that the LCD is included in the price. So if Apple makes the 24" iMac available with a quad-core Core2 Extreme option and the Mac Pro with a quad-core Core2 Extreme option, the two would not automatically commit fratricide against each other since the Mac Pro still needs an external display (which would allow folks to go 20" or 30", in addition to 24").

600 posts in less the seven hours. :eek:
 
I just found something on the dutch apple online store.
It seems there are more grapics cards options comming for the new mac pro :)

They mention the ATI Radeon HD 3870 in the "learn more" window

Belgian Apple Store

Pay attention to the last sentences...

ATI Radeon HD 3870
Als u met bewegende beelden, animatie of 3D-ontwerp en visualisatie werkt, is de snellere ATI Radeon HD 3870 met 512 MB speciaal GDDR4-geheugen waarschijnlijk precies wat u nodig hebt. Op de twee dual-link DVI-poorten kunt u tegelijkertijd twee 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Displays aansluiten, zodat u een extra groot werkoppervlak hebt. We need performance numbers to position this card relative to 8800 GT. Also, a PCIe2.0 card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
We need performance numbers to position this card relative to 3870. Also, a PCIe2.0 card.

That's what I'm waiting on.

Those will come when ATi and nVidia offer their entire lineups with UEFI. This is coming very soon. It's unfortunately waiting on Microsoft Vista SP1 which will have UEFI built-in.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.