That's probably going to be most cars soon, regardless of manufacturer.If it’s anything like iPhones...Why buy a car you will never own or be able to modify without Apple’s proprietary parts? 😂
That's probably going to be most cars soon, regardless of manufacturer.If it’s anything like iPhones...Why buy a car you will never own or be able to modify without Apple’s proprietary parts? 😂
If it’s anything like iPhones...Why buy a car you will never own or be able to modify without Apple’s proprietary parts?![]()
Those people who "know how to make cars" were utterly showed up by Tesla, a startup. At this point I'm convinced the only reason they've all stayed in business so long is lobbying, protectionism, and anticompetitive practices. Anyone here remember Tucker?Good. Personally I don't think Apple should be building a car themselves at all. They're starting from 100+ years behind the curve.
Far better would be to partner with a group of existing manufacturers to integrate their stuff into the cars made by people who actually know how to make cars.
This is incorrect.Tesla has over 2 billion miles recorded and user data. Apple doesn't have ANY data if they're trying to do self-driving which I'm sure they're aiming for.
And those lab ideas will be prematurely hype-announced next year. But will be your typical Elon Musk vaporware for numerous years to come. Overpromise and under-deliver..... that's Elon Musk for ya.Tesla is already ahead.
By that time, Tesla owns the market with full self driving software. Not even including the crazy new ideas Tesla is cooking up in the labs for the next 5 years.
Not what I’m talking about. I’m referring to the android car os like in the polestarGood news:
![]()
iOS - CarPlay
With CarPlay, get directions, play music, and more on your car’s built-in display. And use digital car keys to unlock and start your car with iPhone.www.apple.com
And those lab ideas will be prematurely hype-announced next year. But will be your typical Elon Musk vaporware for numerous years to come. Overpromise and under-deliver..... that's Elon Musk for ya.
I’m referring to this. https://www.polestar.com/us/polestar-2/google-polestar/they already have CarPlay...
Alphabet's Waymo division has way more hours logged than Tesla.
I’m going to do intermittent fasting so I can hopefully afford the lower cost Apple Car mini by release date.
Apple doesn’t need high market share in the auto space for it to be a viable business for them.No way. There's way too much competition for them to wait that long. The only chance they have is if they mass produce before other manufactures cannibalize EV market share
Not bad for being the richest person in the world.And those lab ideas will be prematurely hype-announced next year. But will be your typical Elon Musk vaporware for numerous years to come. Overpromise and under-deliver..... that's Elon Musk for ya.
250 miles in the real world.What are you talking about? Tesla already has vehicles with 400+ miles of range and quicker than the Mach-E, and the next generation Plaid vehicles should put a massive gap between it and the Mach-E. Ford doesn't even try to compare the Mach-E against Tesla's vehicles because they'd lose that comparison so soundly.
This is mine for the past 2 days. It showed the 6th and 7th added together of uploaded and downloaded info.In terms of real data and human hours logged, Tesla has more than Waymo.
My Tesla just last week Friday uploaded 400mb of data to their servers.
Much more likely what you are saying.Do people think that Apple is actually going to release an actual car, or just a CarPlay like standard, that if a car manufacture gets certified or approved, it'll run Apple's self driving software? i.e. BMW's new 3-Series supports Apple Drive, and all you have to do is plug in your phone and it'll control the car.
It is not about cash. Self-driving capability depend very much on the amount of data you have in order to create a sufficiently smart system. Tesla already has millions of cars collecting data in order to improve the neural engine capabilities. It is like having millions of beta testers "working" on the streets. Apple may have all the money it may need but there are some things that can't be just bought. In addition, regardless of how much money you have, you still need time to ramp up production, build facilities, find suppliers, train workers and so forth and everything should be done with the famous Apple secrecy. Even if Apple buys Hyunday (market capitalization of over 49 billions $), they still would need various years to build new machinery, adapt some of the existing manufacturing plants, do extensive testing, obtain approvals from many regulators, crash tests and so forth. If you put into the equation, Apple usual care to every single detail and component, there may be years of delay. By the time the car is ready for commercialization, the battery technology for example would be already outdated and this is where Tesla would still have the lead.I'm sure Apple is also cooking up crazy new ideas. On top of that, Apple won't have the cash problem that Tesla did when it first started. Just sayin'.![]()
Those people who "know how to make cars" were utterly showed up by Tesla, a startup. At this point I'm convinced the only reason they've all stayed in business so long is lobbying, protectionism, and anticompetitive practices. Anyone here remember Tucker?
(and no, I don't own any TSLA except for small portions in ETFs, cause imo the price is impossible right now)