Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe they like the privacy aspect? Why do you think not owning an iDevice would make this card suddenly useless?
Because that is part of Terms and conditions. The card only remains active with an “eligible device” (be it iPhone, iPad, or Apple Watch, and not jailbroken).
 
  • Like
Reactions: tunastink
Are they going to make any money off the card? I don't know for a fact, but I think all the money from the card will go to GS. For Apple, it's all about locking the consumer into the Apple ecosystem. Give up your iPhone and the credit card goes along with it and if you have to cancel it as a result, your credit report gets dinged!
Your credit report is only affected if you cancel a card or start using a new one. Same goes for all credit cards. If you don't want your credit to be affected, just stop using the Apple Card. You can even destroy it if that makes you feel safer. Does anyone know the best way to destroy titanium?
 
Although much like with Apple Cash, the rest of the world also has less of a need for it. For one thing, people outside the US were already inserting physical cards for years, if not moved onto tapping said cards--all before we bothered with chip. Not to mention instant bank transfers for the most part being impossible in the US until the advent of stuff like Venmo and AP in general being more commonly used by non-Americans vs. Americans.

That said, I still hope other countries get Apple Cash and Apple Card eventually.
Even though being told several times, I still scratch my head wondering why the most powerful country in the world cannot push contactless payment into nation-wide adaptation like Australia, for example. Maybe America has its own hurdles stopping this push from happening.

Thanks for heads up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pipis2010
Apple have taken a simple service and made it needlessly convoluted
Even though being told several times, I still scratch my head wondering why the most powerful country in the world cannot push contactless payment into nation-wide adaptation like Australia, for example. Maybe America has its own hurdles stopping this push from happening.

Thanks for heads up.
There's a lot of legacy infrastructure in the U.S. and also lots of bank lobbyists and money to be made by not upgrading systems. Similar to the broadband issues in the U.S.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pianophile
So...after going around and around with both Apple ID support and Goldman card support, the only thing they could do was cancel the card entirely. The cards are strictly tied to the Apple ID that they are initially issued to and cannot be transferred or otherwise ever changed to any other Apple ID, even if they are owned by the same person. Wow, what an incredibly ill conceived concept this entire card is.

I don't quite understand why someone would want or need two Apple ID's. I have had the same Apple ID since Prodigy and AOL were created.. sometime in the late '80's??(maybe in the early '90's) - way before that me.com or iCloud.com stuff... I guess I missed the two-AppleID-boat on that one.
 
talk about being entrenched into the apple "ecosystem". The A-card requires an iPhone running the latest version of iOS. Don't want to update your version iOS on your iPhone because of, let's see, maybe 20 reasons? then your new credit card no worky.
The card requires the latest version to start using because it's a new feature/app/platform. It cannot and should not support older iOS. Otherwise it would not be as secure and would not support some standout features. That being said, you don't need to continually update your iOS to make transactions just like you don't need to continually update your phone to play older games and browse the web.
 
Even though being told several times, I still scratch my head wondering why the most powerful country in the world cannot push contactless payment into nation-wide adaptation like Australia, for example. Maybe America has its own hurdles stopping this push from happening.

Thanks for heads up.

Contactless was an answer to the poor user experience of EMV. EMV was designed because European government telelphone monopolies charged a lot for phone calls, so merchants wanted to verify cards offline. France also was home to a number of smartcard vendors, so it was government stimulus. The poor user experience is a lot due to the offline features.

US got deregulated telecom 10-15 years before Europe did, so our phone calls were much cheaper. Verifying cards online is safer and allows much more advanced fraud detection methods than offline. Then everybody switched to Internet transport, and offline use didn't matter anymore.

Long story short, EMV was an expensive solution to a problem that only Europe had. Then they tried to shoehorn it into a different problem it solves poorly, skimming/duplicate fraud. And by the time that happened, e-commerce was such a big thing that it doesn't reduce fraud, just shifts it.

EMV also ran into a US issue with Dodd-Frank act which requires debit cards to be able to be routed to independent networks, which was passed not long before the transition. The Europeans never anticipated this, and it resulted in a big kludge to get around.
 
Last edited:
Even though being told several times, I still scratch my head wondering why the most powerful country in the world cannot push contactless payment into nation-wide adaptation like Australia, for example. Maybe America has its own hurdles stopping this push from happening.

I think a significant part of it is that we tried contactless cards once and they failed here. I don't blame banks trying to avoid having to roll those out again if at all possible.
 
12.99% about 6% too high. Stay with NavyFCU Visa.

APR shouldn't matter - pay your balance in full. On any reward card - if you are paying interest, you are eating into any rewards you have earned, and thus reducing the overall value of the card.

Any rewards earned from the Apple cards tiered reward system can easily be negated by repeatedly carrying a balance. It's why i'm a fan of their "wheel" that shows how your payment impacts interest payments and thus your net "cash back".
 
Last edited:
"Rights"? You're paying for those benefits and insurance via a higher interest rate, a higher interchange rate (passed on to you by the merchant), annual fees and late fees, and high credit standards (American Express: if they've ever written off a single dollar of your debt, or you filed bankruptcy with their card, you're banned for life). And credit card companies consistently count on users to forget these exist, when utilization goes too high, they cancel them.

And if merchants get their way, interchange is going to drop to Europe's 0.3% levels, leading to complete cancellation of all of these benefits and rewards.

First the US doesn't provide proper consumer protection laws but they say it's ok because credit cards cover it. Then the credit cards take away the coverage.

Apple says they provide optional coverage themselves. Then they increase the repair costs to the level of buying a new item and sue 3rd party repairers so it becomes less optional.

There's only so much Tim can raise Apple average prices for the hardware itself, then it has to come from services.
 
First the US doesn't provide proper consumer protection laws but they say it's ok because credit cards cover it. Then the credit cards take away the coverage.

Apple says they provide optional coverage themselves. Then they increase the repair costs to the level of buying a new item and sue 3rd party repairers so it becomes less optional.

There's only so much Tim can raise Apple average prices for the hardware itself, then it has to come from services.

What country offers price protection as a consumer right? Accidental breakage and theft insurance?

Fine Europe has 2 year warranties on electronics. Look how much more they pay for their goods. No free lunch. You're paying for the warranty as is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pianophile
EMV also ran into a US issue with Dodd-Frank act which requires debit cards to be able to be routed to independent networks, which was passed not long before the transition. The Europeans never anticipated this, and it resulted in a big kludge to get around.
I don’t know what this part of “routed to independent networks” mean and why they have this in the first place. But thanks for the info. :)
 
I don’t know what this part of “routed to independent networks” mean and why they have this in the first place. But thanks for the info. :)

It means by law a Visa debit card has to be able to be also processed by at least one other competing network like Mastercard (Cirrus) or Discover (Pulse). The merchant's card provider chooses which one, based on cost, and they do so by looking at the number.

It was done because Visa and Mastercard were paying banks huge rebates to be the exclusive debit network then raising the fees charged to merchants. This was a method to ensure lower prices by competition.

The problem is the first step of EMV is to choose which network you want to use and that's not known until it reaches the merchant's provider. And there's a large number of smaller debit networks (STAR, NYCE, etc). They had to invent a new way, the US Common Debit AID, to handle this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nugget
So...after going around and around with both Apple ID support and Goldman card support, the only thing they could do was cancel the card entirely. The cards are strictly tied to the Apple ID that they are initially issued to and cannot be transferred or otherwise ever changed to any other Apple ID, even if they are owned by the same person. Wow, what an incredibly ill conceived concept this entire card is.
I am confused here. I also have two different Apple ID’s from way back when before iCloud. It has always been a problem for me when they ask for my Apple ID cuz I don’t know which one they mean. One is used for iTunes, Apple Music and Apple store app and the other is my iCloud ID for all thing iCloud. Which ID am I supposed to use for the Apple Card? And what are the pros and cons of each? What a bummer!
 
at least this is a nice thread with good financial information. many reasons for NOT using an apple card.
what has that disgusting company become ...
[doublepost=1565155999][/doublepost]
Pay off your balance every month and the card's APR will not matter :).

makes sense to sleep under a roof you know, if you dont support it every month it will colapse on your head! thanks for your professional financial advise!
 
12.9 to 23.9% ?!?! Ouch. I have several MC & VISA cards - they range from 6.9 on the low end to 10.9 for the high. Gonna really have to think about whether this one is worth it.
12.9 to 23.9%???? Really. Interest rates in europe are down to 0.75 to 2.5%
 
Mastercard pulled that benefit. It's not Apple's fault. I guess we can fault them for not using Visa network.

Can’t agree.

MC didn’t unilaterally pull it.

Card supplementals are a la carte choices made by the issuing bank (GS) and the cobrand (Apple).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: konqerror
12.9 to 23.9%???? Really. Interest rates in europe are down to 0.75 to 2.5%

Credit card interest rates ( APR ) aren’t linked to bank interest rates. Almost all credit cards have high interest rates, including those in Europe. No one should be surprised at this.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.