Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Or yes, they do get to choose their sexuality in most cases.

Statistically, LGBTQ people are a small percentage of a general population. How did more than 50% of teenagers get to identify themselves as gender neutral? Are you saying Tim Cook is wasting the company resources making rainbow watch faces and rainbow watch bands? I don’t think so.

1) Sexuality is not the same as gender

2) 3% of teens identify as not transgender, significantly less than that identifying as gender-neutral.
 
Is any of this stuff even having an effect on our society? I mean, I see bigotry running rampant every day. The president is bigoted, the people who voted him in are bigoted... we are no better off than we were thirty years ago.

The parades, the forced diversity by Hollywood and the gaming industry, the SJW online... it all just feels empty and pointless. Human beings are always going to be flawed.

It’s nice to annoy the bigots though. Remind them their world is not as small and simple as they’d like it to be.
 
I don’t mind Tim and his colleagues do the Pride thing.:)
Think it only do good for them, and everyone else.

Personally I don’t enjoy to walk in any kind of marches.
But that’s just me. I fullhearted support those who enjoy it.
I just don’t like being in big crowds, no matter the purpose.

Don’t think this takes time from the products and the software evolvelments.
But I do think there might be a focus on some wrong things in Apple today.
Not neccessarly the Pride thing though.
 
Last edited:
I'd love a follow up on that 1955 hypothesis to see just how many of those children actually ended up gay because of Batman.
Batman is gay?
SmartBombStudios-justice.jpg

Oh wait...
1JcF1O

1JcF1O
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regbial
I dislike it when the main message of a brand is undermined by political activists.
Google: https://pride.google
Microsoft: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/pride
Wells Fargo: https://www.wellsfargomedia.com/standingtogether/index.html
Mercedes Benz:
Starbucks: https://news.starbucks.com/news/pride-flag-flies-above-starbucks-headquarters
Nike: https://news.nike.com/news/nike-betrue-2018-collection

The top brands pretty much share similar stances on this event.
 
Reading this thread is like reading the alt right cry babies on YouTube, melting down over "forced diversity" in Star Wars. Look, there's no "forced diversity" agenda. Nobody is shoving "gay life" down your throats. OK, sure, on some college campuses, so-called SJWs have clearly gone too far in terms of their "no platforming" strategies. But thats a small group of very young college activists. What Apple are doing here is simply celebrating within public space the fact that we've made such progress, for gay people: remember, not long ago a *very real* "forced agenda" prohibited their very right to exist! So lets keep it in perspective, please! As for Star Wars, well, despite the fact that "snow flake" is often used to describe those on the left, I think its becoming increasingly clear who the real snowflakes are.

By the way, I might add: absolutely shocking to see so many of commentators here are taking this stupid line of "wish Apple had more pride in their products." Honestly, log off, turn off your screens, and get out of your basements, people. Its obvious what you're really saying. You are belittling the very real struggle of LGBTQ folk, even today, in a society that heaps violence, murder and the vilest stereotypes upon them. There are many things about life in a diverse society that can be debated, politely and in good faith. But whatever about Apple as a company (yes, they should pay Ireland the taxes they owe), or their products (yes, they could be better sometimes -- but have you tried an Android phone?), this participation in pride is a very good thing, and we should applaud it. Regardless of anything else.
 
I was with you until you lumped a whole generation into a pigeon hole, in the same fashion as others lump LGBTQ folks. If there is one person - and there are very many more - born between 1946 and 1963 who didn't "ruin this planet", you are wrong. But of course, you have every right to blame people by birthdate. BTW, Tim Cook is a baby boomer, as was Steve Jobs.

yeah you're right, I'm sorry.
 
A CEO of a publicly traded company turning his own social, political,
or religious agenda into a company policy has nothing to do with human rights.

so what? you can just sell stock. There's religious agenda on things far worse than smartphone companies. :D
and even then, this is not political/religious agenda. Maybe social agenda, but arguably, apple has *a lot* to do with society and social lately.
 
Or yes, they do get to choose their sexuality in most cases.

Statistically, LGBTQ people are a small percentage of a general population. How did more than 50% of teenagers get to identify themselves as gender neutral? Are you saying Tim Cook is wasting the company resources making rainbow watch faces and rainbow watch bands? I don’t think so.
can you please tell me what the heck is supposed to be the motive behind that? I just understand why would someone want to make people gay. :D

Gender-neutral is normal, because young open minded individuals dont want to identify as stereotypical males for females, as in, their constructed roles (manly man and housewife)
 
As far as back as I can remember, Tomboys were seen as perfectly normal. "Oh, she's just a Tomboy" would be the phrase used.

Odd how we never had issues with gender fluidity when it came to Tomboys...
 
Not really, but I support the fact that marriage is a union between a man and a woman:)

They do not allow marriages other than man and woman, as it should be. Also like Russia a lot in this case.
You don’t have to disrespect or being unsupporting of other people’s choices and lifestyles.
You can still be extremely supporting even for the heterosexual lifestyle, if that's your choice.

Drop the disrespect and hate and be a HUMAN first.
Your comments just say that you're not.
You're only a sexual being, where only your sexuality is right.
To me that is mindless and soulless.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: the johnmc
Yet you said that your like how they do pride in Chechnya. Why did you say that? You realize now the error of your post?
They do not allow marriages other than man and woman, as it should be. Also like Russia a lot in this case.
 
See my comment above, people are tolerant, accept others as they are, but when the media and law starts forcing them to accept that other parties way of living and beliefs, then that’s why people feel the need to say what they say.

Being gay is not a way of being, as in a choice.

If you are indeed curious, I can answer. I never said that that 100% of LGBTQ people are so by choice. There are obviously cases when this is not a choice However, before the LGBTQ propaganda, the percentage of those identifying as LGBTQ was a small fraction of those who identify as LGBTQ today.

Thats rubbish. It was not acceptable in the past to be out. That has changed. People have been gay all through history, many probably forced into straight relationships or were single due to society.

Not really, but I support the fact that marriage is a union between a man and a woman:)

Is that the version of marriage where a woman becomes a man's property? Or the marriage where certain states didn't allow interracial marriage? Or the one where you had a wife and a concubine?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.