So tell me, Mr. "Supporter", what "technological success" should Apple be building off? What are they not doing? Please enlighten us as to what technology motherlode Jobs left behind that Cook is willfully ignoring while Jobs' widow and Lucas roll around in piles of money? Ridiculous.
First off, drop the hostile tone. I'm on your side.
I wrote several grafs pointing out how I agree with you, there are too many toxic people on this site. I was trying to appeal to you to not give in to those folks and stay civil, even if we disagree. I especially agreed with you about the homophobic comments that are rampant on these forums that need to be cleaned up. But the admins deleted all that from my original response, so I'm now even more sympathetic to your level of frustration. But I didn't come at you, or anybody else, with any hostility, so I would appreciate it if you didn't vent your legit frustration on me. I learned BASIC on an Apple II Plus, and have bought at least 1 Mac computer for every decade they have been in existence, so there's no need to question my level of support for Apple.
Apple had great products post-Jobs leaving in 1986. My PowerBook 180c was super fast, reliable, and never gave me issues. The Newton was a lot better than most people (and the writing staff at the Simpsons) perceived it to be. The problem was basically similar to the HomePod's: it was too expensive when you could get cheaper alternatives that were close enough to the Newton. As for the Mac lineup, heh: ask a college student who bought a Mac in the early 90s what a crumb-bum experience that was. Good machines, but basically all the same and not different enough to justify the wide range in prices and model varieties (sound familiar?).
They didn't get to the nadir of 1997 in an instant moment, they got there by consistently sticking to needlessly high prices for hardware that didn't justify it, and endlessly re-iterating the Mac into multiple, not quite great versions that were confusing to users to buy. Windows 95 was a near knockout that they should have seen coming and were completely unprepared for.
Yes, I know Jobs was fired. No, I don't think he would have bankrupted the company. The Apple II line was effectively done by 1986; I remember because my middle class grade school's computer lab switched out the 4 Apple II machines we had for 4 Macintosh computers in the fall of 1987. And the Apple II platform could never have supported software like Microsoft Office or even the first version of PageMaker, so he was right to end development.
I never claimed Apple had some other technological innovation they should be building off of instead of what they are now (although judging by iPhone sales, the AW's development is probably stagnant until it becomes an independent device). But that might also be why a lot of long time Apple supporters are worried. I don't see the innovation coming from Cook. The loss of the education market happened on his watch, and his response was: an even more expensive iPad. And yes, the iPad is definitely the best tablet out there. But it doesn't appear to be a market that is going to supplant MacBooks/iPhones so that is not going much farther either. Or at least not much farther at a productive pace.
I think making TV shows is a fools errand. As Harvey Weinstein showed, there is no secret technological sauce to producing great content. Just a lot of good taste, good timing and luck. There's nothing Apple could ever do that would inherently give them a leg up on producing good tv shows over anyone else. Amazon just trotted out a show starring Julia Roberts to great fanfare... and no one watched. It could happen to Apple too.
IMHO, from a tech standpoint, acquiring Musk's companies makes total sense for both companies, with Musk serving as CTO under Tim Cook. Apple would gain valuable, industry-leading tech in two industries that would seem natural fits with the personal computer/device/wearable/ecosystem they built: your car and your home's tech controls. Imagine: the greatest electric car with Apple's trademark modern user interface and design, which would also sync perfectly with your iPhone/iPad/AW, which you can charge at your own home with your Apple home power cell and EV charging system. You might even be able to tell Siri via your HomePod to map a trip somewhere and to start the car at some point.
And Musk would get in Tim Cook someone who knows how to lock down an efficient, smoothly running production line like a professional. It is somewhat satisfying to see the pee taken out of someone like Musk–who seems to give off a rich, douche-y vibe–when he doesn't understand normal humans enough to properly manage auto assembly (something pretty much figured out in the 90s).
It wasn't just Jobs coming back in 1997 that saved Apple; acquiring his NeXT platform gave Apple the code base to make our modern X-based OS. Acquiring Musk's companies could be the 21st century version of that forward-looking move.
But then again, Musk is a real jerk and would probably get himself fired.
PS: If Apple had given us TouchID under the screen on the iPhone X (like Android now has) instead of FaceID, would anyone have complained about still having to use TouchID? Does anyone want to replace the TouchID on their MBP with FaceID? I think the answers to both are no.