Not with 1 gig of ram I ain't
I think it's pretty strange that Tim Cook is continuing to intentionally reduce Apple's cachet by transforming what was once a solidly upper middle class brand into a brand that "sells" free plastic phones and phablets, a device specification reserved for the poor in both the 3rd World and Western nations.
Phablets are great for the poor, across the board, because one device can be used for multiple purposes; those with money can afford specialized devices to serve particular use cases. In the U.S., phablets are also a boon for the poor because most of them are obese and have trouble using their fat, greasy sausage fingers on a reasonably sized screen. For the American poor/obese, carrying such a large device around isn't problematic because they buy gigantic clothing with gigantic pockets; those with money tend to be in better health and to wear stylishly form fitting clothing that obviously is not accented with pockets larger than one's hands.
And I don't know who that watch is targeted at because the only people who still wear watches in any significant numbers are wealthy people who wear very expensive watches and they will not be trading them in for a novelty that only functions as a parasite to a huge phone made for huge poor people.
This just seems like another misstep in a staggering path of them for Cook and I'll be curious to see if the board forces him out in time to turn things around for the company.
I think it's pretty strange that Tim Cook is continuing to intentionally reduce Apple's cachet by transforming what was once a solidly upper middle class brand into a brand that "sells" free plastic phones and phablets, a device specification reserved for the poor in both the 3rd World and Western nations.
Phablets are great for the poor, across the board, because one device can be used for multiple purposes; those with money can afford specialized devices to serve particular use cases. In the U.S., phablets are also a boon for the poor because most of them are obese and have trouble using their fat, greasy sausage fingers on a reasonably sized screen. For the American poor/obese, carrying such a large device around isn't problematic because they buy gigantic clothing with gigantic pockets; those with money tend to be in better health and to wear stylishly form fitting clothing that obviously is not accented with pockets larger than one's hands.
And I don't know who that watch is targeted at because the only people who still wear watches in any significant numbers are wealthy people who wear very expensive watches and they will not be trading them in for a novelty that only functions as a parasite to a huge phone made for huge poor people.
This just seems like another misstep in a staggering path of them for Cook and I'll be curious to see if the board forces him out in time to turn things around for the company.
That may be one of the worst analogies I've ever read.
I don't see much in there to tempt Android users across. They've had many of these features and bigger screens for a while. I'll probably upgrade my 5s but I'm already in the Apple eco system.
Makes no sense whatsoever.
Hmm, not sure about that. The reaction seems to be tepid amongst the Apple fans I know. It's not enough to get me to upgrade my 4S either and even the regular "6" is just too big for me. Androids have been tempting but I feel stuck to iOS now.
Apple knows what they are doing. The iPhone 6 only has 1 GB because it only really needs that amount. iOS 8 will be even more optimized and the fastest phone on the planet with the A8 chip.
The only people who look at specs closely are Android fanboys. I love specs - on a computer - but I don't care about them on a phone or tablet as long as said phone/tablet can run all my apps without lagging.
Apple was beating then just fine at 4", with revenue and profits that exceed every Android vendor on Earth put together. Now, Apple is ready to annihilate the high end of the Android market. By this time next year, the most expensive Android you can get will be $300 and will run an obsolete version of Android on obsolete hardware. There just aren't going to be enough die-hard fandroids to keep the $500 flagship Android phones alive. Most people bought Android for size or price, now it will just be the latter.
One of the rare insightful posts here. You are indeed correct. Buying Android is actually only a conscious decision using real brain cells less than 10% of the time. The rest its either someone who couldn't care less taking whatever the guy at the kiosk gives them for free, or some poor person from a country where a decent phone isn't on the table. However, there are 3 kinds of thoughtful Android buyers-
1) Size- these ones will now switch
2) Cost- will stick to Android but the race to the bottom will mean they will soon be buying Android phones sold at cost, so not an important market for someone who wants to run a good business
3) People living in Google's garden of pure ideology- "Google is teh open" and all that. Of course evidence is piling up that Google is among the most wicked companies you can buy from (they hate privacy, net neutrality, and they've slapped Android OEMs with all sorts of restrictions on what they can do with Google's 'open' platform), so this group should dwindle with time.
This is idiotic. iPhones have never been "upper middle class". iPhones are dirt cheap. Students buy them. Anyone who isn't in the underclass can afford them - perhaps with some savings.I think it's pretty strange that Tim Cook is continuing to intentionally reduce Apple's cachet by transforming what was once a solidly upper middle class brand into a brand that "sells" free plastic phones and phablets, a device specification reserved for the poor in both the 3rd World and Western nations.
So why does the Safari browser allow so many tabs if we're not actually 'allowed' to use them? Why does my iPhone offer multitasking if I'm supposed to make sure all other apps and Safari tabs are closed? It's either a smartphone 'computer in a pocket', or it isn't. I can use a 2-year old Android phone in a manner that I can't use an iPhone 6? RAM solves this problem and it's cheap as chips. Oh and the other area where your argument falls down is that you state we should be using a different device. Ah, so you mean an iPad with the same 1GB of RAM?
No, Tim Cook. I won't be upgrading to a huge phone with garish antenna lines.
No, Tim Cook. I won't be upgrading to a huge phone with garish antenna lines.
OK, this is something I will never forgive Apple.
They just pushed this stupid ****** U2 Album onto all of my devices.
Forcing me to download this crappy music is unacceptable.
What's next? Justin Bieber showing up in my Library, because they struck a deal with the record label?
I think it's pretty strange that Tim Cook is continuing to intentionally reduce Apple's cachet by transforming what was once a solidly upper middle class brand into a brand that "sells" free plastic phones and phablets, a device specification reserved for the poor in both the 3rd World and Western nations.
That is what Apple fanboys told about the 3.5" then 4" screens. That is what they said about NFC. That is what they said about everything else that Apple lacked till Apple gave it to them. No wonder SJ thought customers do not know what they want until we gave them. Only problem is now they are being given those by others..
Sure I like their Apple pay initiative.
I like their iPhone 6.
Not so much their Apple watch but it might sell in droves, not because it is the best but because its customers are loyal. Good for Apple not so much for the customers..
Some of my let downs:
1.) After reading all the specs I'm still wondering why in the hell they didn't boost both cameras pixel up to like at least 10mp and 2mp? It's still only 8mp and 1.2mp? Still can't shoot in 4K!
2.) I was looking to get a gold iPhone since I still have the iPhone 5 in silver, never upgraded to the 5S. Well it looks UGLY now on the iPhone 6 with those white bikini lines. I'll have to go with the black version.
3.) The price of the phone. When I look at what I would get, I'm almost paying $1,000 for an 8mp larger screen iPhone 5C/5S. In NYC after sales tax for a iPhone 6 Plus 64gb that's about $925.
Why? I don't want one. I'll stick with the 5S. I don't want to break my camera.