Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it fair for Apple to publish their iPhone benchmarks while running on brand new batteries, knowing that performance will decline over time? When Apple publishes benchmarks for an iPhone, aren't they giving people the impression that it should always provide that level pf performance?
Aren't most specs/benchmarks for pretty much most things out there that get published or used in advertisements usually come from specific environments and specialized (almost lab, if not actual lab) settings anyway?
 
Aren't most specs/benchmarks for pretty much most things out there that get published or used in advertisements usually come from specific environments and specialized (almost lab, if not actual lab) settings anyway?

Are you seriously trying to say that the difference between lab and real world measurements is the same as slowing down the real world performance a year after launching the product?

Wow.
 
Tim Cook's response was suprisingly tone deaf.

The problem is Apple geniuses didn't suggest or offer battery replacements when 2 year old iPhones took major performance hits after os upgrades. The average customer wasn't aware of this option and there's no question Apple withheld this cheap and easy solution to sell more new phones.

This breach of trust which will surely make users hesitant to upgrade, in turn putting a dent apple's high OS adoption rates.
[doublepost=1516322511][/doublepost]
The third and largest problem is that people who's phones were throttled due to the earlier problems were taking their phones into Apple for service, Apple was telling them that that A) the battery is fine, and B) even if the battery was not fine, we don't throttle our phones. But if you're not satisfied with your phone, might we suggest that shiny new $800 phone over there..

Bingooooo
 
  • Like
Reactions: motulist
Hey Tim! you know what?
although I love Apple products and I actually own more
than a dozen of them,
YOU ARE A BIG REPUGNANT LIAR!
dont' say "maybe we should have been clearer as well"!
When you secretely decided to throttling our iPhones you
knew for certain that was a policy to force people to upgrade
because THERE IS NO NEED TO THROTTLE AN IPHONE ALSO
WHEN IS CONNECTED TO POWER CORD!

Shame on you old liar!
 
Are you seriously trying to say that the difference between lab and real world measurements is the same as slowing down the real world performance a year after launching the product?

Wow.
Nothing related to that part of it was said or even implied in what I said.

Wow, indeed.
 
Utterly fake, he’s nothing but a corporate shell, spouting buzz words and phrases ... when he said everything they do is about the user he came across as utterly false. The man should be sacked, imagine thinking “taking something away from the performance” was an acceptable solution. He says they done it so you don’t miss out on that fleeting moment with your camera ...but if you slow my device down and the camera takes longer to open, I’ll still miss it, Tim!
[doublepost=1516325915][/doublepost]
Phone can crash. Or phone can keep running.

I'm still mystified that people got all bent out of shape that the phone does what it needs to do to keep running. My son's phone was experiencing this (the phone crashing when it had 20-25% battery), until he upgraded to iOS 11, then the crashes stopped.

Seems to me if your option is a crashing phone, or one that keeps running, most people would opt for the latter. People must really be looking for things to turn into causes.

I can understand that logic for older phones but when you see iPhone 7, last years flagship, getting this “feature” then I call foul.
[doublepost=1516326334][/doublepost]I watched Tim speak on one hand about how all he does is for the user while belittling the same users on the other.

Not one ounce of genuine passion for the product comes from that man, yet listen to Scott Forstall recently, despite being sacked by the company, and his passion for the product is real, his eyes light up, he’s genuine.

I absolutely loathe the man (Cook).
 
Tim Cook's response was suprisingly tone deaf.

The problem is Apple geniuses didn't suggest or offer battery replacements when 2 year old iPhones took major performance hits after os upgrades. The average customer wasn't aware of this option and there's no question Apple withheld this cheap and easy solution to sell more new phones.

This breach of trust which will surely make users hesitant to upgrade, in turn putting a dent apple's high OS adoption rates.
Well, people are generally upgrading less often. Not only iPhone, but other smart phones too. Because there is simply little improvement from model to model.

[doublepost=1516326548][/doublepost]
My phone (6) ran perfectly fine until power management was introduced. No shutdowns whatsoever so I do not expect any when power management is shut off. I'm sure there are others out there that will experience the same. No way EVERYONE's battery is bad.
Same here, we have three iPhone 6's that had no battery issues for two years, then the throttling came. I don't expect there to be any problems with throttling off, but going to try to replacing the batteries after summer.

The goal of this power management is to prevent shutdowns before they occur. And my iPhone 6 still runs perfectly fine even after I updated the OS, so wear on these batteries apparently varies.

It is responses like this that make Apple look very guilty.
 
Last edited:
Is it fair for Apple to publish their iPhone benchmarks while running on brand new batteries, knowing that performance will decline over time? When Apple publishes benchmarks for an iPhone, aren't they giving people the impression that it should always provide that level pf performance?
Apple posts benchmarks? I’ve only ever seen them compare performance to older iPhone models?
 
Did you just claim the iPhone 6 uses more power for the CPU than the 5S? The A8 in the iPhone 6 actually has a smaller die size, is manufactured on a smaller process and consumes less power than the A7 in the 5S.

There are users with the iPhone 6 and up that don’t experience throttling. How is that possible if they’re defective? Or did they win the lottery and get a magical battery powered by unicorn dust that nobody else got?

The iPhones aren’t defective. Only your reasoning is.

When Tim or Phil gets on the stage and shows how much faster iPhone 8 is than iPhone 7, I expect that to be the case for the life of the device! Not just the first year!

His argument is not defective. Your lack of critical thinking is.
[doublepost=1516337053][/doublepost]
Pedantic. It's virtually the same thing, and you're still wrong. Unless you want to provide, as I requested, data on all devices so we can see how many are throttled and how many are running fine.




I never claimed only a few people are having the issue. I'm saying (and have said all along in all these threads) is you can't take a few people complaining online and extrapolate that to say pretty much every device (or a majority) has the problem (which is what many posters on MR are doing). There are likely hundreds of thousands of people affected (maybe even a couple million). That's more than enough devices for Tim to apologize, Apple to offer $29 batteries and for Apple to modify their software going ahead. But it's still a small fraction of the total devices out there. People seem to forget how many iPhones Apple sells and that a problem affecting a tiny fraction of devices still results in a large overall number.



Must be hard not to have any data that you actually have to resort to telling lies to try and make a point, and dismiss others arguments by claiming their view is only based on blind devotion.

Sure, I can provide that data. My rate is $300 an hour. I require 20 hours at a minimum to get the work rolling.

PM me for PayPal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ladybug
with the amount of people taking advantage of everything they can against apple, I don't blame them for not disclosing it at all. you'll see people whining and complaining when their battery drops to 95% and they want to change the battery. that just creates more environmental waste. if only some of you worked at a call center / retail then you will see how unreasonable people are. they expect to have the future in the palm of their hands because it cost them their entire month's salary to purchase the phone. those people are so disgusting and what apple has done is protect themselves by disclosing need to know information only because the general public doesnt have knowledge like someone with IT background to be able to understand how tech works. heck even 80% of MR users doesnt even know how a battery works but they still whine about it.
[doublepost=1516337099][/doublepost]with the amount of people taking advantage of everything they can against apple, I don't blame them for not disclosing it at all. you'll see people whining and complaining when their battery drops to 95% and they want to change the battery. that just creates more environmental waste. if only some of you worked at a call center / retail then you will see how unreasonable people are. they expect to have the future in the palm of their hands because it cost them their entire month's salary to purchase the phone. those people are so disgusting and what apple has done is protect themselves by disclosing need to know information only because the general public doesnt have knowledge like someone with IT background to be able to understand how tech works. heck even 80% of MR users doesnt even know how a battery works but they still whine about it.
 
When Tim or Phil gets on the stage and shows how much faster iPhone 8 is than iPhone 7, I expect that to be the case for the life of the device! Not just the first year!

His argument is not defective. Your lack of critical thinking is.
[doublepost=1516337053][/doublepost]

Sure, I can provide that data. My rate is $300 an hour. I require 20 hours at a minimum to get the work rolling.

PM me for PayPal.

It is faster for the life of the device. Because the old device slows down too :)
 
It is faster for the life of the device. Because the old device slows down too :)
I guess that help dramatize the increase in performance of each introduction of new iPhone.

There are just too many ways apple can play with our device. "You want a toggle for performance slowdown? Sure. But that doesnt mean your phone will feel any faster."
 
Except Apple isn't the only company that does this. Laptop manufacturers having been doing this for decades. Where was everyone's outrage over that? Oh, I forgot. It's because it's Apple. xD
I see this kind of argument used all the time — if two people are suspected of committing a crime, would you not prosecute the 2nd if the 1st got away? You’re holding your logic wrong
 
Phones slowing down with every firmware update might be true for Android devices as well. More features are added with every firmware. What my issue with this whole thing is, Apple was wrong on their part to suggest people to upgrade to newer iPhones instead of offering battery replacements first. Introducing battery replacements for half the cost isn't going to cover the upgrade costs that many users paid out of sheer frustration of slow iPhones. Another issue is that the firmware updates are forced down your throat. Even though it calls for a user input to go ahead with the update, the ****** software update pop ups are irritating and can be clicked accidentally. There should be a feature to totally turn off automatic OTA updates. Wishful thinking.... Apple should enable users to downgrade to lower firmwares instead of trying to stop jailbreakers at every step. Apple is concentrating on all the wrong things and innovation has gone for a toss since iPhone 5S/6.

I'm on an iPhone 6S, but my next phone is definately not an iPhone. Am seriously considering going the Android way after staying with Apple for 6-7 years. I feel sad to let go of the Apple ecosystem (except iTunes... thats a ****** curse), but I will settle for Android devices mainly because of easy file transfers and the ability to load whatever firmware version, especially for advanced users who know what has to be done on Androids to keep them malware free.


Whhhhhaaat? Where exactly anywhere did Apple suggest upgrades to people having this issue?

Cite the source.
 
Is it fair for Apple to publish their iPhone benchmarks while running on brand new batteries, knowing that performance will decline over time? When Apple publishes benchmarks for an iPhone, aren't they giving people the impression that it should always provide that level pf performance?

The problem here is that they decrease the performance of your iPhone without your consent. If my iPhone suddenly starts to restart or shut down I can take it to a service provider, change the battery and use it a few years more with the same performance as the day I bought it. If the iPhone becomes slow and I'm unaware that this is caused by battery problem (only Apple has the appropriate diagnostic tools), I have no other option but to buy a new iPhone. There are obviously deficiency in the power management of iOS if you have to reduce performance in order to avoid shutdowns on a battery that is 80% healthy. The fundamental true is that each iPhone becomes slower with each new iOS even with the basic apps as Safari, Mail, Calendar, etc. I want to change my iPhone because I want a new feature available on the new iPhone, not because my older iPhone has become slow crap. If Mercedes reduce the performance of their cars after certain mileage you wont be happy, that for sure even if the reason is to avoid any damage to the engine or something.
 
If Mercedes reduce the performance of their cars after certain mileage you wont be happy, that for sure even if the reason is to avoid any damage to the engine or something.
Many cars will go into a 'limp mode' if a problem is detected with the engine but unlike the iPhone, a warning will flash up on the dashboard telling you to get it fixed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ladybug
I don't know what number of cycles an Apple battery is good for vs. the batteries in other phones, but I really doubt they're putting expensive custom-designed chips and housings and sensors into their phone, but then saying "let's put in a really cheap, crappy battery".

Except the iPhone battery design life is half that of an iPad. Something has been compromised.
 
Coconut battery tests are not accurate at all. My iPhone 6 plus is over 80% capacity as well according to their worthless testing. Of course my cpu is throttled at 50% right now so that makes the numbers look better than they really are.
Apple's test will show the battery as OK even when it's dead and CPU is throttled.

Wonder if they use coconut battery as well.
 
Phone can crash. Or phone can keep running.

I'm still mystified that people got all bent out of shape that the phone does what it needs to do to keep running. My son's phone was experiencing this (the phone crashing when it had 20-25% battery), until he upgraded to iOS 11, then the crashes stopped.

Seems to me if your option is a crashing phone, or one that keeps running, most people would opt for the latter. People must really be looking for things to turn into causes.


thats exactly what it is for the most part. people now feel justified about the whole apple is slowing down my phone to make me buy a new phone. These asshats make me sick.
 
thats exactly what it is for the most part. people now feel justified about the whole apple is slowing down my phone to make me buy a new phone. These asshats make me sick.

That’s one way to look at it. Another that’s been said repeatedly in this thread is: users were never made aware that a $79 battery swap could potentially “rescue” their phone that was often aggravatingly slow. I had a 5S that was so very snappy for years then almost overnight seemed to pause and drag to the point of unusability, often after one of the recent iOS upgrades which left me thinking my 3 year “old” phone just couldn’t work with this fancy new iOS upgrade anymore and my only option was another damn expensive phone after only a few years of good use for the one I had. Not unlike Ford never communicating to owners the “option” of tune ups and oil changes to address operational issues that are likely to arise after a few years of use.

Whether it’s this “withholding” of key info by not communicating it effectively, or not giving the option/ability to easily swap/upgrade batteries and give owners more flexibility to prolong the life of their hardware - THOSE are deserved critiques even for those of us who understand the point of the energy management thing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.