Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Going by that logic no iOS app should be free. And how is not paying Apple 30% mooching for Epic but not Uber? You’re not buying a car from Uber you’re buying a ride. Also if Apple deserves 30% then do ISPs and cell providers too? iPhone would be pretty worthless if it couldn’t connect to the internet.
I agree. I said this in another thread several days ago. By Apple's argument it is perfectly reasonable for the cellular providers to apply a 30% tax on all apps. They deserve it as well. Apple is using cellular APIs and the providers have invested billions in infrastructure and R&D. I sure hope the judge agrees with this line of argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mal Blackadder
"...it's hard to imagine a part of your life that you can't have an app for..."
......

"When asked why apps can't direct users to deals on their websites, Cook said it would be "akin to Apple down at Best Buy saying 'Best Buy, put a sign there advertising where we are and that you can go across the street and get an iPhone.'"

Sure, but customers a.k.a. users can go elsewhere and buy it.
Just another reason to force open the platform, currently Apple users can't go elsewhere.

But you can though. You're just not supposed to link to it. e.g. you can buy netflix on their website. You can buy epic bucks on their website and all of it gets reflected on the iOS apps no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Tim may need to fix this asap XD. She's asking him if he should reconsider his business model... maybe charge a higher app developer fee instead of IAP commission. Higher app developer fee being closer to IP than IAP commission.
 
Steam exists on macOS. Could someone explain to me how the existence of Steam has negatively impacted macOS users?
"Steam allows macOS users to give money to corporations other than Apple. As a macOS user who loves to throw money at Apple, this disturbs me greatly. But I'm more upset that Apple is not allowed to levy income and property taxes. They absolutely should for the amazing services they provide. I don't like the government telling me what to do. Only Apple! I love the security they give me and because I am the only one that matters, other people should not be allowed to ruin my day. If you don't like it, build your own phone and move to a different planet." ~ said no one, ever 😂
 
Last edited:
Why can't Apple just treat Epic Games the same as they treat Uber? Apple allows some developers to do in-app signup to their own payment services. Apple wouldn't have to do anything but change their policy. It wouldn't require any additional work on their part at all.
 
"Cook says that third-party app stores would be "terrible for the user."

No Timmy. It would be terrible for YOU, not the consumer. It would mean more choice (something Apple has never believed in) for the end user. It would be the end of your extortionate cash cow 30% absurdness. It would be the end of the stranglehold you currently have over users and companies.

Your fearmongering isn't stopping the backlash wave rolling into the App Store
 
"Customers don't buy operating systems, they buy devices," said Cook,

Strange. iPhone fans usually state they buy the phone for iOS as they don't want Android.

This is a disingenuous point. First, prove to me that iPhone fans usually say that. Second, even if they say that, they “buy the phone.” The phone is a ”device.“
 
"Cook says that third-party app stores would be "terrible for the user."

No Timmy. It would be terrible for YOU, not the consumer. It would mean more choice (something Apple has never believed in) for the end user. It would be the end of your extortionate cash cow 30% absurdness. It would be the end of the stranglehold you currently have over users and companies.

Your fearmongering isn't stopping the backlash wave rolling into the App Store

the extortion that every other major platform charges and is less then was taken during the physical era?

did you think a company should design, build, develop, market and run one of the biggest stores in the world for free? They should take care of support, user experience, processing fees, etc too? People don’t go to the iPhone because of a certain app. Apps go to the App Store because of the users.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crazytrain
This is a disingenuous point. First, prove to me that iPhone fans usually say that. Second, even if they say that, they “buy the phone.” The phone is a ”device.“
Does disposable income not come into play, too? iPhones are generally more expensive than, or at least on par with, the premium competition. Many people who go with iPhones do so purely for the brand recognition, rather than the value they'll gain from the features.
 
Steam exists on macOS. Could someone explain to me how the existence of Steam has negatively impacted macOS users?
You have to see it in a bigger context I guess. How does allowing sideloading apps impact macOS users ? Think the argument during the trial was something in line with "there are way more malware and viruses on OS X than there are on iOS" for an example, which of cause have an impact on users.
 
Does disposable income not come into play, too? iPhones are generally more expensive than, or at least on par with, the premium competition. Many people who go with iPhones do so purely for the brand recognition, rather than the value they'll gain from the features.

That is also something i have no evidence for. “Conspicuous consumption” is definitely a thing, but I don’t know a lot of iPhone owners who aren’t happy with the value they get. But who I know is just anecdote. I am not aware of any hard data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Also if Apple deserves 30% then do ISPs and cell providers too?
No they don’t. ISPs & cell providers are classified as utilities, Apple’s App Store is not. It’s a digital retail outlet. Companies & individuals already pay ISP’s & cell providers, on a recurring basis, for use of their infrastructure. Just like App developers have to pay Apple to be in the App Store, an infrastructure & ecosystem that Apple invested billions into in order to make it easy & convenient for developers & consumers to engage in a transaction.
 
I’ve never heard of anyone being allowed to testify for a fixed amount of time just because he’s a busy man.

Just this week I read an article about how Betsy DeVos will submit to questioning for three hours in some investigation. I despise DeVos and all she stands for, and I think three hours is woefully insufficient, but I understand that there are people who will do a lot just to get someone rich & powerful on the stand.

It's reasonable that they have a say in how much time they're there because they're not integral to the case and you certainly can harass people through the legal system. I think the term is barratry.
 
  • Love
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
I’ve never heard of anyone being allowed to testify for a fixed amount of time just because he’s a busy man.
This was all agreed upon before it went to trial. This is a civil case, therefore, there are a set of predefined rules and restrictions the lawyers can do. A criminal case does not have these restrictions.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.