Will do that, once I have some time this afternoon.
And indeed I don't assume it will be very useful - but if it is enough fun, I'll keep it.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple CEO Tim Cook Uses Vision Pro Every Day
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
And indeed I don't assume it will be very useful - but if it is enough fun, I'll keep it.
Sigh it’s not a valid reason it’s a limitation of the tech. Which is what I’m questioning. The AVP is already a really expensive niche product struggling for a wider adoption. Why would Apple compound the problem by adopting a tech that would exclude those under 16 who wear glasses? I can afford the AVP but I’m not buying it if the kids can’t use it. I bet the future vision non pro will do away with such a limitation.
But unlike AVP you can share Quest 3 easily and there are some hardware differences that are advantage for Quest 3 (controllers, weight)
Tim wears one, so I don't have to. Thanks Tim.
that would be a good argument to follow him - I will include the Vision Pro in my fitness program, would like a stronger neck
No one says "no", because it might offend someone.
Meh, if I got one for free then I'd use it too!
...uses the Apple Vision Pro "in all aspects of [his] daily life.". GMAFB🤦♂️
Thanks for the fauxthentic interview, Tim.
The next Apple Vision Pro update will include a sanctimonious setting that will recognize Tim Cook's trained and textbook executed mannerisms, such as
Thanks for the fauxthentic interview, Tim.
The next Apple Vision Pro update will include a sanctimonious setting that will recognize Tim Cook's trained and textbook executed mannerisms, such as
- The V sign
- "Steepling" or Prayer hands
- "Belly" hands
Last edited:
Tim is quick to talk about Patents and completely forgets to mention most of this tech was bought from others and in many ways these patents and innovations weren't even theirs to begin with - example - without the Montreal firm Totem this AVP was and would be impossible... Tim is an operations guys - plain and simple.
It's not going to look huge, it's just going to take up a large portion of your vision. We have depth perception, so we can tell the difference between things that are large and things that are close.
A large screen further away feels more immersive than a smaller screen nearer to you. You can test this by going to a cinema.
Probably the eye strain. Or the price. Or both. Or they saw themselves in a mirror.
It's like saying: Why liquor is being sold if those under 21 can't drink?
Have you considered that the reason why those under 16 shouldn't use it may be more medical than technical?
Their eyes are still developing, and the optical features of the AVP may affect them. So why bring potential lawsuits to themselves? Also, I don't believe many under 16 year olds will buy one either, and Apple is not interested in targeting their product to them.
The AVP is far superior to what's currently available in the consumer/prosumer market. So why is it that some people keep looking for reasons to complain and whine ???
Why buy an expensive OLED TV when you can watch it on a regular LCD?
Why buy an 85" TV when you can watch it closer on a 32" TV and get the same big screen effect?
Why buy a big car when you fit in a small one?
Why buy a smartphone if a phone should only be used to make phone calls?
Try the AVP for two weeks, then you may understand. Just don't go by what others say, because giving an opinion on something you don't understand makes you look bad.
Last edited: