yes, Tim seems unaware of what 'road map' implies. We used to call them 'Road Apples'. It seems virtually all Macs are now Road Apples.There's a valid reason for it.
http://lowendmac.com/2014/road-apples-second-class-macs/
yes, Tim seems unaware of what 'road map' implies. We used to call them 'Road Apples'. It seems virtually all Macs are now Road Apples.There's a valid reason for it.
My guess is Kaby Lake is what they were waiting for because it makes driving higher resolution displays possible with a single cable.
It's true as far as the higher-end models are concerned -- we just recently had Xeons hit with the higher core counts that are upgrades over what they're using for those options. For the quad core "entry" model though, there have been a couple revisions released. So half right, half wrong as far as the CPU itself is concerned.
I feel like a good compromise would be to let the Mac Pro also have consumer-grade i5/i7 CPU options starting lower priced, then scaling up to the high core count Xeon options. Most users would probably trade core count for newer architectures, as their workloads may not be massively parallel.
Huge thread full of nothing but complaints.
On the plus side, my 3 year old Mac Pro is still the "latest" Mac Pro Apple makes.
Yup, don't be shocked when the next "computer" appliances from Apple AFTER iMac & iMac Pro are ARM based sans Intel.
Apple isn't the only camp going ARM.
Both MS andare pushing that way.
Win10 builds are running on ARM, and most "universal apps" run on a phone - imagine using BASH from a phone!
Apple switching desktops to a HW platform based on its mobile devices - bitcode to help push full programs to iOS.
It's true there are delays, but the only Mac he doesn't care about is the Mac mini. But that's not to say it won't be updated.
You don't know that whining isn't going to help, or what Apple's going to do in the future. You're just trying to dismiss Mac users whose growing contempt for Apple threatens your confidence and peace of mind.
It seems Apple as a company can only do one thing at a time. This sounds like a small startup company not being able to develop multiple products at the same time. Even smaller camera companies like Pentax, Nikon, Canon, Olympus or Fuji can deliver more products than the big cash throwing Apple company. What i see here: Apple is having management problems or problems of how their managers are working on projects.
"You don't know that whining isn't going to help..."
Ok, let me ask you this: How has that been working for you so far?
Has it brought back the CD drive? How about axing the floppy disk - that was a huge whine-worthy crowd pleaser. Has whining brought back FireWire ports? The DVI connector?
Has it brought back full-travel keyboards - will a good whine bring those back? How about desktop computers with card slots? Perhaps keyboards and mice with user-replaceable disposable batteries, has Apple brought those back? Has it made laptops thicker, festooned with a ton of legacy connectors? Do you expect Apple's next laptop to have 20 year old USB A ports if you whine loud enough, and really mean it?
Maybe a more hearty whine will bring back a much thicker iPhone? How did that huge whine-fest work out for the ton of people complaining about the first iPhone getting rid of physical keyboard keys - did those come back? How about a 1 week battery that pre-1997 phones had - has whining brought that back?
How about Apple's executives? Has the constant moaning about them and calling for their termination worked out?
I could go on and on. In the meantime, again, how has whining been working for ya?
"You're just trying to dismiss Mac users whose growing contempt for Apple threatens your confidence and peace of mind."
Whoa, a three-fer: A deflection, straw man, and a tiny precious ad hominem all rolled into one. Rush me to the burn unit!
No, sorry to disappoint. I'm not dismissing anyone's gripes - I believe they're important to people. Just wondering when people will finally understand that whining will not influence Apple's product direction.
Do you really want to influence Apple's product plans? It's easy. Stand up, vote with your wallet and buy something that meets your requirements. That's what I'd do. And for sure, there's no way I would I would embarrass myself on a public forum crying about a company not making products I need.
I do offer a huge tip-o-my-hat and a ton of respect to those that have actually stood up, opened their wallet and have actually switched.
Dude, it sounds like you need to take your own advice and stop whining about the "whiners".
People are pissed at Apple for good reason. And they are leaving. So let them (erm..us) vent, what does it matter?
Just sayin'.
Dude, it sounds like you need to take your own advice and stop whining about the "whiners".
People are pissed at Apple for good reason. And they are leaving. So let them (erm..us) vent, what does it matter?
Just sayin'.
I think if you cut through all the drama, there is a real concern that for all the gains Apple products have gained recently, they don't outweigh the cons of said products. Including the removal of key small, but important parts of the MacBook line (MagSafe, USB3) that made Apple products easy to use. The new MacBook line is nowhere near that compared to a Windows laptop, but they're becoming ever closer as Microsoft are trying to streamline with their own hardware products.
However, it's fair to say most of the computing industry is becoming a bit stale regarding technology. Until the next battery/input tech is matured, the gains will always be small.
For me personally, I don't get why Apple won't enhance remote access tech and allow MacBook users to remote into their own MacPro at home to take advantage of the raw power of a desktop (especially if people want more power efficient laptops that are smaller and take less-powered CPUs). My next Mac is likely to be a desktop for that reason as it's so easy to get a VPN connection up and running at home (and remove that security risk of being on public wi-fis and exposing my traffic with everyone else).
Oh, and BTW, Tim, not everyone wants a screen permanently attached to their computer. So please consider making a headless computer again that isn't as weak as the 2014 Mini and not as outrageously expensive as the Pro.