Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No problem. I was writing in slight regret that’s all. Nothing against what you said at all. I just am a big tinker so windows serves better (when I have time to eventually get back to it). I realized that most everyone I know which isn’t that many to start with are not on imesssge (anyone out of US are on either WhatsApp or telegram or signal), mostly use iMessage with the wife. Photos are nice, but honestly my phone does a good job with it. With the advancement of cloud storage integration comes easier for sure.

Don’t get me wrong the Air is an amazing machine with great built quality.
Np,just wanted to let u know I wasn’t mocking you or anything

Yeah I used to be but I’ve grown tired of tinking .to each their own :)

For now though,you can’t deny that only Apple makes arm laptops which good power and battery. Maybe in 12 years windows laptops will catch up
 
  • Like
Reactions: aajeevlin
Has anyone else noticed that the battery health, as reported by the Settings app, degrades steadily for a couple of years but then slows/stops at around 81 or 82%? Seems to have happened for both the iPhones I've used in recent years.

So there is a lower chance of falling below 80% battery just before your AppleCare+ ends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reason077
Wow, there's a lot of whining (whinging for those of you in the UK!) and moaning and gnashing of teeth on this topic. I have a contrarian view, which I'll share at the end of all these quotes (or maybe in a separate post)...

This seems a little much...
The Apple iPhone 14 (not "plus") with 256 GB memory will cost you $900 plus the average sales tax in the US (5%). So $945, give or take. If you live in a place that has generously voted in favor of the highest sales taxes (9.5%), then you'd pay about $1000 on that iPhone.

So $99 to replace your abused (yeah, I said it; more on that later) iPhone 12's battery is ONLY 10% the cost of a new phone. And it gives you another 2-6 years of use of that device. So it's not that much, not really.
Typical Apple...
What do you mean by "typical"? Batteries are made with Lithium and Nickel, and they only come from 6 places in the world. Raising prices is probably sensible.
Has anyone else noticed that the battery health, as reported by the Settings app, degrades steadily for a couple of years but then slows/stops at around 81 or 82%? Seems to have happened for both the iPhones I've used in recent years.
I know it's natural to suspect that big bad Apple is out to get all of us. But consider this:

Batteries are chemical devices containing metal from the Earth's crust. As a consequence of that, they will behave and misbehave a lot more like the analog devices that they are, even if they do have built-in electronics. Did you know that the electrolytes can actually MOVE AROUND inside a battery? Yep, It's a mushy gooey mess in there. As I said, chemicals.
I've got an iPad 2 which is over 11 years old and still gets great battery life on the original battery. Admittedly it's had a fairly easy life for the past 5 years or so, but I still drag it out semi-regularly to play the classic iPad game "FTL".
"Fairly easy life" is a thing, and good on you for taking good care of your battery.
In 3 or 4 years it will be $120.
With the geopolitical dynamics going on the world, and with every fool politician wanting to force electric vehicles on us with 100, 200, or more pounds of batteries in each vehicle, lithium and nickel are going to get a lot MORE expensive. So yeah, you're probably right, just maybe not for the reasons you think.
I guess when I need a new battery I will just buy a iPhone 15-17 by then.
Buy a new iPhone if you want one. That to me is good enough reason all by itself to buy a new iPhone. But if it's only because your battery is beyond its useful life, that's just financially foolish.

Even if it one day costs $200 to replace a battery in an iPhone, that's only 20% of the cost of a new one. And it will extend the service life of that device by another 2-6 years, depending on how badly you abuse batteries.
Just 43% not over 100% lol xd
Right. It's cheap to replace a battery, even though they are made with elements from the Earth that are not available in unlimited amounts.
US inflation is running at about 8.5%. That's not as bad as in some parts of Europe, but still the worst it's been for several decades.
Siri tells me that inflation is 7.6%, but I think those numbers are all gamed. Come on, when was the last time you bought meat from the grocery?
There's all kinds of additional costs, in addition to employing the high-skilled labor required to safely replace and dispose of the old battery.
You're absolutely right. The greed, if there is any here, is not on Apple. The metals must be mined and transported, bribes must be paid off in those countries, then the parts must be manufactured, the pollution must be generated (hey, it's part of the deal), and maybe one day they find their way to our pampered selves by way of a smiling Apple Store employee installing them in our devices while we sit on a wooden stool in a clean white Apple Store at our local mall. Malls...do we still have those things?

Anyhow, it's nearly an idyllic task to have an Apple device's battery replaced. And you can stop for lunch before you head home!
I'm on an iPhone 12pro and I've decided to be a bit more frugal and just keep it as I dont really need any of the hardware improvements that have been added (not saying they are bad just not compelling for me).
This makes good sense, and I'm on an iPhone 12 Pro Max. I also still have two watches and two iPads. All are fine and even if I paid $500 to replace all the batteries in every device, it would STILL be worth not having to replace any of the devices. It may be borderline on the Watch Series 4, but then I'd have to replace it with a Watch Series 8, which would cancel out any cost-justification.

Replacing batteries is always less expensive than replacing devices. And that doesn't even account for the time I would have to spend doing restores and configuring the new device! My time has value. My labor comes at a price; usually to me.
So two questions for the kind folks out there:
1 - Do Apple still do a Battery replacement service for older models (I dont want to risk taking it to a non-authorised place)
I think so. I've never needed to replace a battery in any apple device, not even going back to the iPhone 5, which was my first Apple device.
2 - Do I have to prep the phone in any way when I take it in (may be being paranoid but do I have to worry about some dude in the back room stealing the data off it for example :))
The phone has a secure enclave built-in. If you don't give the technician your unlock code, they won't be able to view your stuff. Now iCloud, on the other hand, actually IS a major potential avenue for somebody to see your stuff. And we all use iCloud to back up our devices, right? I tellya, we humans are really good at outsmarting ourselves! 🤣
This is normal for all lithium batteries. There’s a lot of degrade within the first year then slows.
All batteries lose effectiveness over time. This can be accellerated by deep-discharging and subjecting the device to heat.
Could it be there is more involved with the new phones? And if so, Apple had to make an adjustment to keep their margin where they want it.
Maybe, but I think it's more about the current and projected cost of materials; namely the nickel and lithium needed for batteries.

Nickel:
In addition to batteries, Nickel is also used in the making of coins, wire, and anything made of stainless steel...so your fancy cutlery and all those shiny appliances in your kitchen. It's the Nickel that resists corrosion, so its use is also critical for the manufacture of ships, aircraft, and spacecraft!

Lithium:
Over 70% of the world's Lithium is used to make batteries, but it is also used to make glass, ceramics, and even medicines! It's also used as (or to make?) a flux for use in casting (I take that to mean metal casting).

Milk those pro customers
I hope you're not fancying getting an electric vehicle someday. Because you too are about to be "milked". And you're a guy!

My point is, I really don't think anybody is being "milked"; not when it comes to batteries.
...what the **** are you people doing to your phones that you need to get the battery replaced? Ever? This has not been so much as even a consideration for me going back to the original iPhone 15 years ago. Never needed this. Not even once. And I drive these phones harder than anybody I know. Way more charge and discharge cycles. Way more time left on chargers just because I can. Etc.
Heat. Deep discharges. Overcharging.

Those can all degrade battery life expectancy. Apple's batteries have circuitry to prevent overcharging. Batteries with lithium in them kind of need that to prevent them from exploding. And maybe that circuitry also shuts off the device before it reaches a truely "deep discharge" state. Who knows, maybe they even shut down the phone when the battery still has 10% left. That would be quite effective in making batteries last longer. If so, then the only factor not in Apple's control is heat.
You can’t degrade your phone battery that much within a typical 2 year AppleCare coverage period unless you hit it with a blowtorch. There’s just no way.
Or leave it in a hot car. A lot of people probably do that.
There is none. This is not related to the product or inflation. Apple needs to milk the pro customers with high willingness to pay to increase overall revenue, because the low end and units are dropping more and more.
Apple makes a lot more money selling new devices than it does replacing batteries. Not even with the new $99 price to replace a battery. Honestly; you're NOT being ripped off.
Price increases are not fun, but everyone’s acting like the price of *everything* isn’t increasing.
I know, right?
 
Last edited:
Hold on, I thought a battery replacement for an EV was 5k+?

They’re presumably talking about the 12V battery, not the high-voltage traction battery (which you shouldn’t normally need to replace during the lifetime of the car!)
 
As much as the price increase blows, I have to say the better software to protect the battery + larger sized batteries compared to 5-8 years ago has largely made battery replacements a thing of the past for me.

I’d frequently go through 3-4 batteries in the life of a phone, but my iPhone X lasted over 3 years without really showing any noticeable age on the original battery, and my 13 Pro has insane battery life.
 
Well this batteries are made of lithium and the price of raw lithium is up 300% this year. Everything lithium related is getting a price increase. I paid $20 for a single Energizer 9v Lithium.
I wasn't aware of the cost increase percentage on Lithium. But yes, this makes sense with everything else going on.
This is actually a huge deal, for a lot of reasons.

Let's consider that most people that get battery replacements are for phones that are multiple years old. For example, the iPhone 8 (which still has software support).

Currently, battery replacements for the iPhone 8 are $49. The value of the device is around $150 used. This means that, to replace the battery, you're paying 33% of the value of the device.
And even THAT might not be a bad thing. Paying 33% the value of the device, if it helps get you another few years forward without a $900 bill? That might be a good thing, depending on one's needs and ability to pay for things.
Let's consider the iPhone 14 Pro, in 2028. The value would be around the same as the iPhone 8 is now, but battery replacements will hold at $99. This means you'll be spending over 50% of the value of the phone to replace the battery.
Yeah, I get that, but we can only plan so far forward. At some point, we have to trust that we'll have alternatives and options when we get to 2028.
Thus, many people will just get a new device. This brings many fundamental problems:

- Creates eWaste by additional upgrades
- Prompts users to get cheaper third-party batteries which can vary in quality and safety
- Prompts users to misleadingly get AppleCare+ to subsidize this cost, when battery replacements are typically necessary AFTER the coverage period of the insurance.
But people who can do math will not always automatically choose to upgrade. Some of us can do math! We just don't like to...😅
Financially sensitive move by Apple and ****** for the consumer.
Sensitive? You must mean "sensible", and if so, I agree.
Edit: On second thought, maybe you meant to say "insensitive", which would also be valid. And yes, it would be seen as an "insensitive" move by Apple. But it could still be a necessary move.
Pricing is irrelevant? Do you think only the Kardashians of this world are buying Apple products?
She should have said "price insensitive". Here's what I mean:

The cost of an Apple device may be too expensive for some. But for a lot of us, it's just "too expensive right now". You see, many have made the decision to go with Apple for an upcoming purchase. Just not right now.

I am "price insensitive" for the iPhone. That means that when it's time for me to upgrade to the iPhone 15 or 16, I will pay whatever the going price is for that model. I am price-sensitive right now because I have a working-great iPhone 12. But looking forward toward expected hardware and software improvements in the next 2-3 years, I will make the jump. I probably WON'T be reading about comparisons between Apple and Samsung.

If anything pushes me away from the Apple ecosystem, it would be a major fail on security, including Apple giving away my user data to the government. I'm far more sensitive to that than I am to any supposed price increases.
A huge majority of working people are not getting inflation matching pay rises but yet companies are constantly increasing their prices to combat inflation rises, companies who are able to absord costs increases into their profits but they wont, not even to help out customers during this unprecedented time of inflation rises and cost of living rises.

How many millions/billions of $$$ in profit does Apple make every month and yet they cannot be bothered to absorb cost increases so battery change price can stay at $69 even for a little while until everything gets back to normal.
Talking about "$$$ of profit" as a reason that a company or person should do what you want them to do is the WRONG way to think about things, and will always make it more difficult for you to be financially successful in the long term. It will also make you less happy than you could be, because you'll always be thinking that somebody or some company is "out to get you". Oh sure, they might be. But that thinking will always hold you back in life, so I encourage you to let it go.
you just know that during one of their conferences someone brought up the idea of giving away the phones for free, and having everything be subscription-based, along with limiting how long the hardware "works" until it has to be repaired at a premium.
The "Great Subscription Crash" will one day happen, I'm sure of it. We already have a term in business called "Subscription Fatigue", and a lot of people are starting to exhibit signs of having it. It's a real thing and that's why I will never invest in a company or business that has subscriptions as its majority way to make money.
High skilled labor. lol
If you have to train somebody how to do something, you've just given them skill. You may laugh, but it's a thing.
Hold on, I thought a battery replacement for an EV was 5k+?
It depends. I replaced a battery in a hybrid some years ago and that was $3K. Today it might be closer to 5K, what with the price increases of Lithium and Nickel.
 
Last edited:
I miss user-replaceable batteries.
So do I, and I've replaced thousands of them. But it's the price of having all that capability in such a small space.

These had replaceable batteries. ;)
s-l400.jpg
 
What's the future?

I promised I'd share my thoughts here. So look at all of the battery technology happening around the world today. It's fascinating and exciting!

But it's also frightening. Look at all of the manufacturers of cars, computers, uninterruptible power supplies, data center equipment, smoke alarms, watches, electric shavers, LED lights, and all manner of other things that rely on batteries made either with Nickel or with Lithium.

And now the Governor of California has said it will be illegal to buy a gas-powered vehicle in I don't know...2035 or sometime. So let's think about the mathematics presented by these prognostications.

Lithium and Nickel are mined out of the Earth's crust in only a few places in the world. Mostly these are poor countries with, shall we say, a "flexible idea of law and order". 70% of the Lithium mined now is ALREADY SPOKEN FOR by the battery industry. The remainder is used to make glass, ceramics, medicines, and lots of other stuff.

When the auto makers need to buy more batteries so that they can bump up production to meet the (what, new laws?) expectation of these states, and even whole countries, where is that Lithium and Nickel going to come from? New mines? Maybe we'll find a few more places that can be mined. I'm sure there are some.

But we're unlikely to find thousands of new places. So where do the raw materials for new batteries come from? Do we stop making stainless steel and ceramic so that we can make more EV car batteries? Do we force people out of their vehicles and into more dangerous methods of mass-transit? Do we stop making medicine so that we'll have enough Lithium for EVs?

Humans don't poop Lithium, so it's gotta come from somewhere. If not from the ground, then we have to recycle it. But we're actually quite inept at successfully recycling things, especially old batteries. And all of the batteries in the world today will NOT satisfy the demand for battery raw materials in the 2030s.

What happens when supply becomes constrained? We get price-increases. This is called the law of supply and demand. What happens if price-increases are made illegal? Even if we were to index the price increases to inflation, we'd be "breaking" the law of supply and demand. And that always ends up with shortages.

Why does this guy "Flight Plan" turn a MacRumors thread from an iPhone battery replacement price increase topic into a bigger macro-economic discussion? Because he knows that nothing happens in a vacuum and because he has seen a lot of people in this thread only thinking about themselves and their place in the world.
But it's undeniable that everything is related to something else. And in a way, everything is related to everything else. The economics version of "Six Degrees from Kevin Bacon", if you will.

I don't have any solutions. But I do know that we don't have access to enough Nickel and Lithium to make our dearest, sweetest battery dreams come true for all time. We may even have less of those elements than we do coal and oil!

This is just for your thought. Even if the moon were made solely of Lithium and we started weekly mining shuttles back and forth in order to satisfy our goal of putting batteries in all of the world's busses, cars, trains, ships, and personal computing devices, we would eventually run out of the stuff. "I'm old enough to remember the moon" would become a real saying and nobody would be able to dance or do other romantic things in the moonlight.
 
Wow, there's a lot of whining (whinging for those of you in the UK!) and moaning and gnashing of teeth on this topic. I have a contrarian view, which I'll share at the end of all these quotes (or maybe in a separate post)...


The Apple iPhone 14 (not "plus") with 256 GB memory will cost you $900 plus the average sales tax in the US (5%). So $945, give or take. If you live in a place that has generously voted in favor of the highest sales taxes (9.5%), then you'd pay about $1000 on that iPhone.

So $99 to replace your abused (yeah, I said it; more on that later) iPhone 12's battery is ONLY 10% the cost of a new phone. And it gives you another 2-6 years of use of that device. So it's not that much, not really.

What do you mean by "typical"? Batteries are made with Lithium and Nickel, and they only come from 6 places in the world. Raising prices is probably sensible.

I know it's natural to suspect that big bad Apple is out to get all of us. But consider this:

Batteries are chemical devices containing metal from the Earth's crust. As a consequence of that, they will behave and misbehave a lot more like the analog devices that they are, even if they do have built-in electronics. Did you know that the electrolytes can actually MOVE AROUND inside a battery? Yep, It's a mushy gooey mess in there. As I said, chemicals.

"Fairly easy life" is a thing, and good on you for taking good care of your battery.

With the geopolitical dynamics going on the world, and with every fool politician wanting to force electric vehicles on us with 100, 200, or more pounds of batteries in each vehicle, lithium and nickel are going to get a lot MORE expensive. So yeah, you're probably right, just maybe not for the reasons you think.

Buy a new iPhone if you want one. That to me is good enough reason all by itself to buy a new iPhone. But if it's only because your battery is beyond its useful life, that's just financially foolish.

Even if it one day costs $200 to replace a battery in an iPhone, that's only 20% of the cost of a new one. And it will extend the service life of that device by another 2-6 years, depending on how badly you abuse batteries.

Right. It's cheap to replace a battery, even though they are made with elements from the Earth that are not available in unlimited amounts.

Siri tells me that inflation is 7.6%, but I think those numbers are all gamed. Come on, when was the last time you bought meat from the grocery?

You're absolutely right. The greed, if there is any here, is not on Apple. The metals must be mined and transported, bribes must be paid off in those countries, then the parts must be manufactured, the pollution must be generated (hey, it's part of the deal), and maybe one day they find their way to our pampered selves by way of a smiling Apple Store employee installing them in our devices while we sit on a wooden stool in a clean white Apple Store at our local mall. Malls...do we still have those things?

Anyhow, it's nearly an idyllic task to have an Apple device's battery replaced. And you can stop for lunch before you head home!

This makes good sense, and I'm on an iPhone 12 Pro Max. I also still have two watches and two iPads. All are fine and even if I paid $500 to replace all the batteries in every device, it would STILL be worth not having to replace any of the devices. It may be borderline on the Watch Series 4, but then I'd have to replace it with a Watch Series 8, which would cancel out any cost-justification.

Replacing batteries is always less expensive than replacing devices. And that doesn't even account for the time I would have to spend doing restores and configuring the new device! My time has value. My labor comes at a price; usually to me.

I think so. I've never needed to replace a battery in any apple device, not even going back to the iPhone 5, which was my first Apple device.

The phone has a secure enclave built-in. If you don't give the technician your unlock code, they won't be able to view your stuff. Now iCloud, on the other hand, actually IS a major potential avenue for somebody to see your stuff. And we all use iCloud to back up our devices, right? I tellya, we humans are really good at outsmarting ourselves! 🤣

All batteries lose effectiveness over time. This can be accellerated by deep-discharging and subjecting the device to heat.

Maybe, but I think it's more about the current and projected cost of materials; namely the nickel and lithium needed for batteries.

Nickel:
In addition to batteries, Nickel is also used in the making of coins, wire, and anything made of stainless steel...so your fancy cutlery and all those shiny appliances in your kitchen. It's the Nickel that resists corrosion, so its use is also critical for the manufacture of ships, aircraft, and spacecraft!

Lithium:
Over 70% of the world's Lithium is used to make batteries, but it is also used to make glass, ceramics, and even medicines! It's also used as (or to make?) a flux for use in casting (I take that to mean metal casting).


I hope you're not fancying getting an electric vehicle someday. Because you too are about to be "milked". And you're a guy!

My point is, I really don't think anybody is being "milked"; not when it comes to batteries.

Heat. Deep discharges. Overcharging.

Those can all degrade battery life expectancy. Apple's batteries have circuitry to prevent overcharging. Batteries with lithium in them kind of need that to prevent them from exploding. And maybe that circuitry also shuts off the device before it reaches a truely "deep discharge" state. Who knows, maybe they even shut down the phone when the battery still has 10% left. That would be quite effective in making batteries last longer. If so, then the only factor not in Apple's control is heat.

Or leave it in a hot car. A lot of people probably do that.

Apple makes a lot more money selling new devices than it does replacing batteries. Not even with the new $99 price to replace a battery. Honestly; you're NOT being ripped off.

I know, right?

You can believe whatever you want, but only you think that way in this post lol xd
 
One reason is probably due to increased labor costs.

Paying Apple Store employees more will contribute to increased prices.
 
Product Strategy in Europe is a massive fail, iPhones prices in Europe are insanely high, they increased average $100,00 to $150,00 Wille in US remains the same price, Apple costumers are furious and boycotting upgrades.

Most of it is due to the strong dollar. Euro and several other European currencies have fallen dramatically against the dollar this year.
 
Product Strategy in Europe is a massive fail, iPhones prices in Europe are insanely high, they increased average $100,00 to $150,00 Wille in US remains the same price, Apple costumers are furious and boycotting upgrades.

Most of it is due to the strong dollar. The euro and several other European currencies have fallen dramatically against the dollar this year.
 
What's the future?

I promised I'd share my thoughts here. So look at all of the battery technology happening around the world today. It's fascinating and exciting!

But it's also frightening. Look at all of the manufacturers of cars, computers, uninterruptible power supplies, data center equipment, smoke alarms, watches, electric shavers, LED lights, and all manner of other things that rely on batteries made either with Nickel or with Lithium.

And now the Governor of California has said it will be illegal to buy a gas-powered vehicle in I don't know...2035 or sometime. So let's think about the mathematics presented by these prognostications.

Lithium and Nickel are mined out of the Earth's crust in only a few places in the world. Mostly these are poor countries with, shall we say, a "flexible idea of law and order". 70% of the Lithium mined now is ALREADY SPOKEN FOR by the battery industry. The remainder is used to make glass, ceramics, medicines, and lots of other stuff.

When the auto makers need to buy more batteries so that they can bump up production to meet the (what, new laws?) expectation of these states, and even whole countries, where is that Lithium and Nickel going to come from? New mines? Maybe we'll find a few more places that can be mined. I'm sure there are some.

But we're unlikely to find thousands of new places. So where do the raw materials for new batteries come from? Do we stop making stainless steel and ceramic so that we can make more EV car batteries? Do we force people out of their vehicles and into more dangerous methods of mass-transit? Do we stop making medicine so that we'll have enough Lithium for EVs?

Humans don't poop Lithium, so it's gotta come from somewhere. If not from the ground, then we have to recycle it. But we're actually quite inept at successfully recycling things, especially old batteries. And all of the batteries in the world today will NOT satisfy the demand for battery raw materials in the 2030s.

What happens when supply becomes constrained? We get price-increases. This is called the law of supply and demand. What happens if price-increases are made illegal? Even if we were to index the price increases to inflation, we'd be "breaking" the law of supply and demand. And that always ends up with shortages.

Why does this guy "Flight Plan" turn a MacRumors thread from an iPhone battery replacement price increase topic into a bigger macro-economic discussion? Because he knows that nothing happens in a vacuum and because he has seen a lot of people in this thread only thinking about themselves and their place in the world.
But it's undeniable that everything is related to something else. And in a way, everything is related to everything else. The economics version of "Six Degrees from Kevin Bacon", if you will.

I don't have any solutions. But I do know that we don't have access to enough Nickel and Lithium to make our dearest, sweetest battery dreams come true for all time. We may even have less of those elements than we do coal and oil!

This is just for your thought. Even if the moon were made solely of Lithium and we started weekly mining shuttles back and forth in order to satisfy our goal of putting batteries in all of the world's busses, cars, trains, ships, and personal computing devices, we would eventually run out of the stuff. "I'm old enough to remember the moon" would become a real saying and nobody would be able to dance or do other romantic things in the moonlight.
shhhh, you are speaking common sense but this the road we are on, swapping one fossil fuel for another.

For a 100 bucks, I would rather get a new phone every 2-3 years.
 
Once u go Apple you never go back, and they know it . Plus they don’t help you with the fact that notes can’t be transferred ,and you are deep in Apple ecosystem .
So they just keep removing features and increasing the prices ,more and more ,hammering you to see how much you can take (particularly EU consumers ) ,because they know they don’t have any real competition
the problem ist that they'r stuff actually is working great. except the notch and fantasy island, of course 😁😁😁
 
Thus, many people will just get a new device. This brings many fundamental problems:

- Creates eWaste by additional upgrades
- Prompts users to get cheaper third-party batteries which can vary in quality and safety
- Prompts users to misleadingly get AppleCare+ to subsidize this cost, when battery replacements are typically necessary AFTER the coverage period of the insurance.

Financially sensitive move by Apple and ****** for the consumer.

Lithium prices are quite high in 2022 and also increased labor costs for Apple Store employees.
 
The "Great Subscription Crash" will one day happen, I'm sure of it. We already have a term in business called "Subscription Fatigue", and a lot of people are starting to exhibit signs of having it. It's a real thing and that's why I will never invest in a company or business that has subscriptions as its majority way to make money.

This is pretty much why I stopped downloading 99% of the stuff from the app store. I automatically move to the next thing as soon as I see "In-App Purchases" written under the Get button.

Don't get me wrong, there are a ton of apps worth paying money for, but when you have a simple "if a, then b" app riddled with adware, and the dev wants you to pay them to get rid of this stuff, I just don't see the reason to give their software a try.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the battery health, as reported by the Settings app, degrades steadily for a couple of years but then slows/stops at around 81 or 82%? Seems to have happened for both the iPhones I've used in recent years.
This is absolutely true for me. Mine’s been at 80% for >1 yr (iPhone 11). But my battery life is much decreased from a year ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reason077
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.