Getting back on track, I personally think the watchband looks pretty good for a casual wear weekend band. My guess is that it will age well too; if wearing it helps raise awareness of diversity and equality, all the better.
And as for you, you're not forced to buy it, but if you can't appreciate that LGTBQ people are still significantly discriminated against and *still* fighting stigma (from people like you) then you're going to have to realise that you're part of the problem and probably not who this promotion is aimed at.
You want stigma? what about the mental health awareness band? Thats a far bigger problem in the world then who people want to love. I could care less about who people want be with, I just don't care, go for it, have a ball.
Just my two cents.
But women don't make me hard. Should I force myself with viagra or something?
View attachment 705378
I'm not at all saying you do not have problems. Everyone has problems. But regarding your gender, race and sexual orientation, you are not at all oppressed by the world. You have the rights and equality that everyone else is fighting for.
That's it - I don't want to see anymore straight couples on TV, or holding hands in public or kissing each other goodbye at the airport (ewe gross). Why can't they live their life in silence like EVERYBODY! Why do they need to flaunt it in our faces?!?
Straight people? Whose straight these days?
Is there a pink band for cancer support, red for product red, black blue black for law enforcement support, blue & pink for pro life, white for christians, green for muslims, and b&w for traditional family support?
I guess there is a huge market for various band colors. Someone should capitalize on it.
All I'm saying is that Apple would be in a lot of trouble if they made a "straight" watch band right? Well it's funny to me how it doesn't work both ways in this case. That's all.
Rewarding one group and not the other isn't how equality works.
Okay this is ridiculous. Where would it end? You want Apple to produce an Apple Watch band for every single minority group in the world? Apple's supply chain would spend its entire time making straps! The LGBTQ strap represents probably the most significant, and widespread, of these modern day issues/groups and is also one personally advocated by Tim Cook, the CEO of...Apple!
If Apple were to celebrate something only for straight people, it would cause an outrage. So how is it ok for Apple to have something that only benefits gay people? I thought we're all trying to come together as one? This is a very simple concept that for some reason only works one way in your eyes.The LGBTQ commmunity feels the same way. However it doesn’t work both ways. How long have you been able to legally marry the person you love? Have you you ever been threatened or beaten for being straight? Have you been denied adopting unwanted children because you are straight? When was the last time you donated blood? Wish I could. Lots of people need it. You’re lucky you don’t need a straight pride month. Most of the year is straight pride for you, you just don’t realize it.
It’s easy to say “equality works both ways” when you’ve always had it your way.
I’m curious though, were you one of the “all lives matter” people?
Wrong, I said: "Let's do something for everyone."Apple says: "Let's do something to support the LGBTQ community, because they are a persecuted group."
You say: "Let's not."
That's not my argument nor what I want. What I'm saying is, if a company announced that it was doing something only for straight people, it would cause chaos! Whats next Apple? Celebrating only a certain race? Christians only? Gays only?...Hey, be my guest. Create a straight, white pride march. Let's see how many people turn up.
And hell is hot.
Will the pride bands be available in Saudi Arabia?
What a silly argument. The old "if you can't fix all problems, then don't try to fix anything" meme. Apple chooses to work on several problems across the world. Why do they have to do something about whatever you care about?I thought Apple was down with the oppressed peoples, and Non-Muslims have it FAR worse in those countries than LGBTQ folks do here.
I'm sure Bob appreciates your support! But he still wants some potatoes.But the one thing that really got to me in this thread is Bob. Can he, please for the sake of all that's good and holy, get his damn potatoes? The guy must be starving.
I'd argue that LGBT issues are inherently about sexism. Different rules and different accepted roles for different people based on their genitalia.Sexist is based upon gender, not sexuality, first off.
You have a truly baffling ability to ignore the answers to your questions as you keep asking them over and over again.If Apple were to celebrate something only for straight people, it would cause an outrage. So how is it ok for Apple to have something that only benefits gay people? I thought we're all trying to come together as one? This is a very simple concept that for some reason only works one way in your eyes.
[doublepost=1498220865][/doublepost]
Wrong, I said: "Let's do something for everyone."
In case you can't read.
[doublepost=1498222216][/doublepost]
That's not my argument nor what I want. What I'm saying is, if a company announced that it was doing something only for straight people, it would cause chaos! Whats next Apple? Celebrating only a certain race? Christians only? Gays only?...
Thats not how it works actuallyI hope for your sake you've never worn mixed fabrics or eaten bacon, otherwise you'll find out for yourself just how hot hell is when your time is up.
When folks roll out "but marriage is the sacred union of a man and a woman, for the purposes of procreation" trope, I always end up thinking... Okay, let's take that at its word:
First off, divorce is out, period. After all, "What God has joined together let no man put asunder", so no divorce and no second/third/fourth/etc. marriages, except in the case of the death of a spouse (oh, and now might be a good time to point out, those church-going sanctity-of-marriage-protecting conservatives elected a president who is on his third marriage - also funny how the president who keeps saying "America is the greatest country" can't find anyone worthy of being his wife in the US and so has imported two of his three from foreign countries).
If they say, "the church owns and defines marriage, not the state", fine, this completely breaks the separation of church and state: clearly we need to immediately go through every single one of our federal/state/county/city laws and regulations (and tax laws) and replace "marriage"/"married" with "civil union", and "husband"/"wife" with "partner" - now there's no special privileges for marriages, and gay and straight couples alike are equally able to apply for a civil union contract. Oh, and everyone who was previously "married" will need to go file new "civil union" licenses if they want those benefits now exclusively available to those in civil unions.
Alternatively, since the remaining key point (if they then try to say "oops, sorry, it's actually not about religion"), falls to "it's for the purposes of procreation", then let us revise our laws to say: yes, marriage is for the purpose of procreation, so anyone unable to produce a child will not be allowed to marry, and if the marriage does not produce a viable child within, say, two years, the state will automatically dissolve the marriage and the couple will lose every benefit given to married couples.
But those who insist that marriage is only between a man and a woman, and thus gays should not be allowed to marry, don't seem ready to "put their money where their mouth is", and agree to changes like the above. They want to hide behind saying that religion and procreation dictate the situation, but they don't want there to be any side effects for them.
Thats not how it works actually
Along those lines, I was talking to a rather self-righteous religist a number of years ago at a place I worked at, and they mentioned that the idea of gays 'marrying' was abhorrent to them. I mentioned that they themselves had been married a number of times, and wondered how gay marriage played a roll in their life. They said that it didn't. They just 'fell out of love', to which I said that it just sounded like 'serial monogamy' in that they got married just as a cover to have sex, and when the marriage got inconvenient, they bolted. I could tell I hit the nail squarely. End of conversation. But that was one of my last days working there, so I was happy to leave on that note. I was so fed up with the false piety...
Some of the more 'christian' things this person said and did were to tell me that they were surprised I didn't burst into flames when I said that I went to church for a wedding. Nice person, huh. A good German, or 'christian'?
[doublepost=1498225114][/doublepost]
A good Christian should not say things like that but everyone makes mistakes and treats people imperfectly thats the whole point.
Actually the Bible that American Taliban seek to beat others to death with DOES say those things. Sorry...
You don't get to determine who is oppressed or not oppressed based on nothing whatsoever. You *think* you know other people's situations when in reality you have no idea. If people want to wear rainbow watch bands that's fine with me, but you will do yourself a favor if you stop making assumptions about other people based on skin color, and gender and all that. Doing that makes YOU *racist* and *biased* and all those other things I'm sure you dislike so much. Just a heads up.
Someone said "Happy Holidays" to him instead of "Merry Christmas".How on earth does this remotely even attempt to make sense?
Educate me - how are you oppressed? Moreover, how is any white, straight male oppressed based on their race or sexual orientation? How does society put you down, and what rights do you not have that others do?
Wrong, I said: "Let's do something for everyone."
In case you can't read.
Start your white pride, straight pride parade and see how many people actually turn up.
Homosexuality is a sin. Hate the sin, love the sinner and pray that they will see the error of their immoral lifestyle and repent.