Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And as for you, you're not forced to buy it, but if you can't appreciate that LGTBQ people are still significantly discriminated against and *still* fighting stigma (from people like you) then you're going to have to realise that you're part of the problem and probably not who this promotion is aimed at.

Sorry, but the poster asked posed a question , which you decided to turn into into a agenda. In this case you are part of the problem. Asking why only certain special editions exists is not discriminating against that edition . If Apple supports LGTBQ, great, though people have a right to ask why other groups are not supported ....it raises the questions of favouritism. There is a lot of discrimination out there... I worked got the BBC, and there was clear direction we could not show favouritism to any groups, and had to be impartial, how you understand why this is important?

Anyway this thread is about to becomes an agenda minefield.
[doublepost=1498195974][/doublepost]
You want stigma? what about the mental health awareness band? Thats a far bigger problem in the world then who people want to love. I could care less about who people want be with, I just don't care, go for it, have a ball.
Just my two cents.

Spot on. This is a massive global issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blacktape242
I'm not at all saying you do not have problems. Everyone has problems. But regarding your gender, race and sexual orientation, you are not at all oppressed by the world. You have the rights and equality that everyone else is fighting for.

You don't get to determine who is oppressed or not oppressed based on nothing whatsoever. You *think* you know other people's situations when in reality you have no idea. If people want to wear rainbow watch bands that's fine with me, but you will do yourself a favor if you stop making assumptions about other people based on skin color, and gender and all that. Doing that makes YOU *racist* and *biased* and all those other things I'm sure you dislike so much. Just a heads up.
 
That's it - I don't want to see anymore straight couples on TV, or holding hands in public or kissing each other goodbye at the airport (ewe gross). Why can't they live their life in silence like EVERYBODY! Why do they need to flaunt it in our faces?!?


Ow god...

I said that this kind of stuff like stupid parades and watch bands etc. is a not the way to make people accept you. I am fine with gay people. Those gay people who dont' give a flock about what others think and live their life like EVERY OTHER PERSON. Those gay people who don't dress like they want to become a rainbow just to show people THAT THEY ARE DIFFERENT. IT WILL MAKE IT WORSE. You know why? Because people don't like change.
Let's be realists here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miniyou64
Is there a pink band for cancer support, red for product red, black blue black for law enforcement support, blue & pink for pro life, white for christians, green for muslims, and b&w for traditional family support?
I guess there is a huge market for various band colors. Someone should capitalize on it.

Okay this is ridiculous. Where would it end? You want Apple to produce an Apple Watch band for every single minority group in the world? Apple's supply chain would spend its entire time making straps! The LGBTQ strap represents probably the most significant, and widespread, of these modern day issues/groups and is also one personally advocated by Tim Cook, the CEO of...Apple!
 
All I'm saying is that Apple would be in a lot of trouble if they made a "straight" watch band right? Well it's funny to me how it doesn't work both ways in this case. That's all.

So if Apple had a Minority Rights-watch strap, it'd be "funny" that they can't have a KKK-watch as well? Those poor KKK members are being discriminated as well! We just want equality here!
[doublepost=1498211245][/doublepost]
Rewarding one group and not the other isn't how equality works.

When both groups are at equal level, your argument works. But right now it's 1 vs -1. Now you're just being that jealous rich kid who wants an ice cream for nothing just because some poor kid who passed an exam got one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Good for Apple.

Supporting equal rights is something we should all want. We all have to live together. And there's plenty of evidence around that that fight for equality is far from over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichTF and CarlJ
Okay this is ridiculous. Where would it end? You want Apple to produce an Apple Watch band for every single minority group in the world? Apple's supply chain would spend its entire time making straps! The LGBTQ strap represents probably the most significant, and widespread, of these modern day issues/groups and is also one personally advocated by Tim Cook, the CEO of...Apple!

This is an open door for 3rd party manufacturers. Apple doesn't have an exclusive market of being the only company that can manufacture bands.
If Apple is making money from a small demographic of a social group of 2% how much more can be made for larger groups. :)
 
The LGBTQ commmunity feels the same way. However it doesn’t work both ways. How long have you been able to legally marry the person you love? Have you you ever been threatened or beaten for being straight? Have you been denied adopting unwanted children because you are straight? When was the last time you donated blood? Wish I could. Lots of people need it. You’re lucky you don’t need a straight pride month. Most of the year is straight pride for you, you just don’t realize it.
It’s easy to say “equality works both ways” when you’ve always had it your way.

I’m curious though, were you one of the “all lives matter” people?
If Apple were to celebrate something only for straight people, it would cause an outrage. So how is it ok for Apple to have something that only benefits gay people? I thought we're all trying to come together as one? This is a very simple concept that for some reason only works one way in your eyes.
[doublepost=1498220865][/doublepost]
Apple says: "Let's do something to support the LGBTQ community, because they are a persecuted group."

You say: "Let's not."
Wrong, I said: "Let's do something for everyone."
In case you can't read.
[doublepost=1498222216][/doublepost]
Hey, be my guest. Create a straight, white pride march. Let's see how many people turn up.
That's not my argument nor what I want. What I'm saying is, if a company announced that it was doing something only for straight people, it would cause chaos! Whats next Apple? Celebrating only a certain race? Christians only? Gays only?...
 
I am straight, I know a lot of gay friends, it is me who has the pride watch strap, who organises going to pride parades and talks about inequality, why? Because i've seen the stress, the bullying, the misogyny and the violence my friends have put up with for trying to find someone to love and I am there to support them in any way I can, THAT is why i am proud of wearing the pride colours.
It shocks me how people can be so closed minded, everyone should be able to love whomever they fall in love with no matter who they or thier partner are.

The argument about why not a straight watch strap, come on people! We had a similar issue in my hometown of Leeds where a railway bridge which went over the street where the majority of gay clubs are in the city was re-painted with rainbow colours we had the same complaints of where is my straight bridge!
FFS, if you want equality and this is your argument, fine! Get beaten up by people randomly when you're with your partner, live a part of your life afraid what your parents are going to say when you tell them you're straight, get banned from a place of worship for being straight, have to fight for the right to marry your straight partner then I agree once you have done that and more, heck i'll pay apple myself to design the hetero watch band with two straight lines down it!
 
I thought Apple was down with the oppressed peoples, and Non-Muslims have it FAR worse in those countries than LGBTQ folks do here.
What a silly argument. The old "if you can't fix all problems, then don't try to fix anything" meme. Apple chooses to work on several problems across the world. Why do they have to do something about whatever you care about?

But the one thing that really got to me in this thread is Bob. Can he, please for the sake of all that's good and holy, get his damn potatoes? The guy must be starving.
I'm sure Bob appreciates your support! But he still wants some potatoes. :D

Sexist is based upon gender, not sexuality, first off.
I'd argue that LGBT issues are inherently about sexism. Different rules and different accepted roles for different people based on their genitalia.

If you cut the marriage debate down to it's bare bones, it's about whether two people living together can get the same rights under the law regardless of their sex.

If Apple were to celebrate something only for straight people, it would cause an outrage. So how is it ok for Apple to have something that only benefits gay people? I thought we're all trying to come together as one? This is a very simple concept that for some reason only works one way in your eyes.
[doublepost=1498220865][/doublepost]
Wrong, I said: "Let's do something for everyone."
In case you can't read.
[doublepost=1498222216][/doublepost]
That's not my argument nor what I want. What I'm saying is, if a company announced that it was doing something only for straight people, it would cause chaos! Whats next Apple? Celebrating only a certain race? Christians only? Gays only?...
You have a truly baffling ability to ignore the answers to your questions as you keep asking them over and over again.
 
When folks roll out "but marriage is the sacred union of a man and a woman, for the purposes of procreation" trope, I always end up thinking... Okay, let's take that at its word:

First off, divorce is out, period. After all, "What God has joined together let no man put asunder", so no divorce and no second/third/fourth/etc. marriages, except in the case of the death of a spouse (oh, and now might be a good time to point out, those church-going sanctity-of-marriage-protecting conservatives elected a president who is on his third marriage - also funny how the president who keeps saying "America is the greatest country" can't find anyone worthy of being his wife in the US and so has imported two of his three from foreign countries).

If they say, "the church owns and defines marriage, not the state", fine, this completely breaks the separation of church and state: clearly we need to immediately go through every single one of our federal/state/county/city laws and regulations (and tax laws) and replace "marriage"/"married" with "civil union", and "husband"/"wife" with "partner" - now there's no special privileges for marriages, and gay and straight couples alike are equally able to apply for a civil union contract. Oh, and everyone who was previously "married" will need to go file new "civil union" licenses if they want those benefits now exclusively available to those in civil unions.

Alternatively, since the remaining key point (if they then try to say "oops, sorry, it's actually not about religion"), falls to "it's for the purposes of procreation", then let us revise our laws to say: yes, marriage is for the purpose of procreation, so anyone unable to produce a child will not be allowed to marry, and if the marriage does not produce a viable child within, say, two years, the state will automatically dissolve the marriage and the couple will lose every benefit given to married couples.

But those who insist that marriage is only between a man and a woman, and thus gays should not be allowed to marry, don't seem ready to "put their money where their mouth is", and agree to changes like the above. They want to hide behind saying that religion and procreation dictate the situation, but they don't want there to be any side effects for them.

Along those lines, I was talking to a rather self-righteous religist a number of years ago at a place I worked at, and they mentioned that the idea of gays 'marrying' was abhorrent to them. I mentioned that they themselves had been married a number of times, and wondered how gay marriage played a roll in their life. They said that it didn't. They just 'fell out of love', to which I said that it just sounded like 'serial monogamy' in that they got married just as a cover to have sex, and when the marriage got inconvenient, they bolted. I could tell I hit the nail squarely. End of conversation. But that was one of my last days working there, so I was happy to leave on that note. I was so fed up with the false piety...

Some of the more 'christian' things this person said and did were to tell me that they were surprised I didn't burst into flames when I said that I went to church for a wedding. Nice person, huh. A good German, or 'christian'?
[doublepost=1498225114][/doublepost]
Thats not how it works actually

Actually the Bible that American Taliban seek to beat others to death with DOES say those things. Sorry...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwosigns and RichTF
oppression? go to north korea or the middle east......I think people will see the real meaning of oppression, something a watch band has no meaning. For apple this is about MONEY.
 
Along those lines, I was talking to a rather self-righteous religist a number of years ago at a place I worked at, and they mentioned that the idea of gays 'marrying' was abhorrent to them. I mentioned that they themselves had been married a number of times, and wondered how gay marriage played a roll in their life. They said that it didn't. They just 'fell out of love', to which I said that it just sounded like 'serial monogamy' in that they got married just as a cover to have sex, and when the marriage got inconvenient, they bolted. I could tell I hit the nail squarely. End of conversation. But that was one of my last days working there, so I was happy to leave on that note. I was so fed up with the false piety...

Some of the more 'christian' things this person said and did were to tell me that they were surprised I didn't burst into flames when I said that I went to church for a wedding. Nice person, huh. A good German, or 'christian'?
[doublepost=1498225114][/doublepost]

A good Christian should not say things like that but everyone makes mistakes and treats people imperfectly thats the whole point.

Actually the Bible that American Taliban seek to beat others to death with DOES say those things. Sorry...

It actually really does not. Youre referencing Old Testament but Jesus made some updates. :)
 
You don't get to determine who is oppressed or not oppressed based on nothing whatsoever. You *think* you know other people's situations when in reality you have no idea. If people want to wear rainbow watch bands that's fine with me, but you will do yourself a favor if you stop making assumptions about other people based on skin color, and gender and all that. Doing that makes YOU *racist* and *biased* and all those other things I'm sure you dislike so much. Just a heads up.

How on earth does this remotely even attempt to make sense?

Educate me - how are you oppressed? Moreover, how is any white, straight male oppressed based on their race or sexual orientation? How does society put you down, and what rights do you not have that others do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldmacs
How on earth does this remotely even attempt to make sense?

Educate me - how are you oppressed? Moreover, how is any white, straight male oppressed based on their race or sexual orientation? How does society put you down, and what rights do you not have that others do?
Someone said "Happy Holidays" to him instead of "Merry Christmas".
 
Wrong, I said: "Let's do something for everyone."
In case you can't read.

In your previous post, you attributed a quote to Apple, which was fabricated. Your post read:

Apple says, "lets do something that only benefits gays."

Apple has never uttered this sentence.

Now, a fabricated quote has been attributed to you, and you are claiming that that is "wrong". If you think that fabricating quotes is wrong, then you should not do it in the first place. You do not like the taste of your own medicine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
Start your white pride, straight pride parade and see how many people actually turn up.

Funny story: There was a 'white power/pro-gun' thing on the Mall in DC the last time I was there. It was hilarious. It was about a dozen, possibly more, people that looked like their picture should be on a wall in a police station for child sexual assault, milling around pointing out people that were walking by and making rude comments about them. They harassed a particularly cute woman that walked by, who shot them 'the bird', and resulted in what you would expect from a group of 'empowered' troglodytes. One even started following her. Yeah, that was 'white power'. They even yelled at a black guy that walked by that commented that 'their movement was dead, otherwise there would be more people there'. He also told them to go back to their mother's basement, which I found incredibly funny. None of them looked like they had been outdoors in a long time. But I kept walking. Before they were out of view, I took a quick picture of them, for 'posterior', oops, posterity. One of them saw me trying to take the picture and gave me the finger.

Such impudent rage... I wondered if his mom did know where he was... :D

And I thought that 'deplorables' didn't go far enough. 'Reprobate' maybe? It means 'predestined for damnation'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zooby
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.