Your taking an example that I used towards someone else's example and twisting it. That wasn't my original statement. So no, that's not a "taste of my own medicine" at all.
A watch band that supports gay and lesbian communities? Where's the watch band that applauds the straight people? It's got to work both ways or else it's sexist. Funny how that works huh?
It is highly pretentious. Pride is a word you should treat carefully. You can take pride in your work but pride to be homosexual?
That doesn't make any sense at all.
Homosexuality is a sin. Hate the sin, love the sinner and pray that they will see the error of their immoral lifestyle and repent.
[doublepost=1498308586][/doublepost]Spoken as someone who knows absolutely nothing about the history of gay rights. Do you even know how pride parades came into being? Go research.
It is utterly non-sense to link this with the word pride, regardless of the history. That the Anglo-saxon world is carelessly throwing around such words is well known.
You are completely missing my point but I do not wish to further elaborate I am afraid. It is not that important to me after all and has nothing to do with what you are trying to link it to nor to any other conversation you ever had with anyone before I doubt.
Sorry, 'pride' means to not be stepped on, or pushed aside. So 'gay pride' is a fair use of the word.
People take pride in many things they don't personally earn.
You may think it's pretentious to be proud of a citizenship you just happen to have been born into, but many will disagree.
It makes sense as a response to oppressors telling people that they should be ashamed of themselves because of their sexual orientation.
[doublepost=1498308586][/doublepost]
That's non-sense as well, please read a dictionary. Pride - 'a feeling of deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one own's achievements' - how you would link this to not be stepped on or pushed aside is a riddle to me.
[doublepost=1498308678][/doublepost]
Yes in the artificial world of an American - thank you for making my point. The use of the word pride is used carelessly on a daily basis like toilet paper. I rest my case.
[doublepost=1498309277][/doublepost]
I believe you can send a different and stronger message to oppressors and don't need to parade around proclaiming you are proud about your sexual orientation. The interpretation of that message is simply incorrect although of course I understand the points above as the incorrect usage of the word is commonly accepted by the average commoner.
Saying that, because of the above it is easy to win over the average smaller minded person to the extent of control by creating the illusion of something greater that you can take pride in. It is funny how the same methods used and work in terrorist groups and regimes such as China, Russia (any other questionable regime) and in the US on a daily basis. Any way, this is going way too far now, I am out
jingoism
I don't know why this word has always seemed to me to be onomatopoeic. Somehow the sound of it evokes, for me, the attitude and political stance it describes—an aggressive, bullying, rowdy, and mindless nationalism: The voters worried that the candidate's jingoism might involve the country in a senseless war. In fact, the origin of jingo is thought to be a corruption of Jesus, and by jingo can be traced to a nineteenth-century English music-hall ditty about the foreign policy of the day. I much prefer it to its near relative, chauvinism —named for one of Napoleon's soldiers—with its more refined, deceptively polite, and less boisterous associations.
Jingoism refers to nationalism in the form of aggressive foreign policy. Jingoism also refers to a country's advocacy for the use of threats or actual force, as opposed to peaceful relations, in efforts to safeguard what it perceives as its national interests. Colloquially, it refers to excessive bias in judging one's own country as superior to others—an extreme type of nationalism.
I believe you can send a different and stronger message to oppressors and don't need to parade around proclaiming you are proud about your sexual orientation. The interpretation of that message is simply incorrect although of course I understand the points above as the only incorrect usage of the word is commonly accepted by the average commoner.
Saying that, because of the above it is easy to win over the average smaller minded person to the extent of control by creating the illusion of something greater that you can take pride in. It is funny how the same methods used and work in terrorist groups and regimes such as China, Russia (any other questionable regime) and in the US on a daily basis. Any way, this is going way too far now, I am out
It's just a TV show....but, food for thought:
There is no such thing as an average human being, let alone "an average commoner" or "an average smaller minded person". If you seek to explain yourself by using such nonsensical phrases, it isn't surprising that you don't have a credible position in this debate.
Thankfully, your interpretation of the efficacy of LGBTQ community parades in advancing the fight against the prejudices that they face has no bearing on anybody in any community.
A watch band that supports gay and lesbian communities? Where's the watch band that applauds the straight people? It's got to work both ways or else it's sexist. Funny how that works huh?
I did. The word "pride" has several definitions. If your dictionary only contains one, perhaps you need another, more comprehensive volume.please read a dictionary. Pride - 'a feeling of deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one own's achievements' - how you would link this to not be stepped on or pushed aside is a riddle to me.
"a high or inordinate opinion of one's own dignity, importance, merit,or superiority"the incorrect usage of the word is commonly accepted by the average commoner.
It is honestly a sad thing that people are so uncomfortable with certain segments of a population adopting a symbol, and a corporation making a product based on that symbol. I mean, there are companies who make their living selling only American flags, or crucifixes, or tshirts with political statements on them. Should they all be required to sell products covering all identities, races and creeds? Why should Apple be held to a different standard? Why is it okay that charities themselves only represent one interest, why don’t they try to help everybody? Don’t you see how absurd that notion is? Ask yourself, if Apple made a band with an American flag, or a Christmas themed watch band, would you start a thread about it? Probably not.
I doubt your discomfort isn’t with Apple making this band, it is with the cause the band represents in your mind. Apple putting this band out mingles the identities of “Apple owner” and “gay rights supporter” causing cognitive dissonance. I would honestly be totally fine if you just came right out and said “The idea of gay sex makes me uncomfortable. I don’t like the idea of it, and it makes me feel gross.” I can’t judge your feelings about that, just ask that you understand that it isn’t okay to restrict other people’s behavior based on your discomfort. I am really uncomfortable with religion, but I don’t ask others to stop practicing it based on my discomfort. Live and let live.
This is what a lot of the right is experiencing these days: The Distress of the Privileged | The Weekly Sift
Spoken as someone who knows absolutely nothing about the history of gay rights. Do you even know how pride parades came into being? Go research.
It is utterly non-sense to link this with the word pride, regardless of the history. That the Anglo-saxon world is carelessly throwing around such words is well known.
You are completely missing my point but I do not wish to further elaborate I am afraid. It is not that important to me after all and has nothing to do with what you are trying to link it to nor to any other conversation you ever had with anyone before I doubt.
Homosexuality is a sin. Hate the sin, love the sinner and pray that they will see the error of their immoral lifestyle and repent.
It's not a sin at all. It's just different to your sexuality and they tend to be a lot less judgmental and a lot more tolerant of those with opposing lifestyles. The sooner out if date views like yours are eradicated, the better.
I guess it's a "sin" when your life is defined by a two thousand years old user manual. You'd think we'd get more "advanced" as centuries go buy, as science progresses and technology is so prominent. Nope. Still as primitive as ever.
I guess it's a "sin" when your life is defined by a two thousand years old user manual. You'd think we'd get more "advanced" as centuries go buy, as science progresses and technology is so prominent. Nope. Still as primitive as ever.
Makes sense. Just the type of crowd I'd expect to show up to these events... Probably living on mom's basement and unemployed too.
Check this out... Look at the crowd who showed up to a recent "pro-family" (aka anti-gay) march. This is why I tell those like this user who want a "straight pride" or a "white pride month" to go ahead and push for it or create their own event.
It is hysterical the number of vehemently anti-gay pastors and religious leaders that turn up to have accounts at rentboy and grinder.
I knew this fixation on teh gay wouldn't help for them...
So off topic, and not making any points. Congratulations?It certainly is. You made up a quote for Apple. So I did exactly the same for you.
You did not appreciate it when it was done to you. It follows that you do not like the taste of your own medicine.
Yup, that went right over your head as well!Yeah cause straight people are discriminated against based on their sexual orientation every single day.
Does it donate a percentage of the sales to "only straight people?"Apple offers a wide selection of mono-tone bands to choose from to express your singular orientation.
/S
So off topic, and not making any points. Congratulations?
Yup, that went right over your head as well!