Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How does this get someone to buy a LV handbag?

LV_11-03-31_Vitrines-Protos_08.jpg


It associates massive creativity and style with Louis Vuitton and gets you to notice the bag. The absurdity of wanting a bag that weights more than elephant, even an invisible one, could make you chuckle ;-).
 
I honestly wonder what the ROI of such an advertisement is? I mean - it must cost a leg but it's still only a physical display in a department store window in a single city. It may create some internet "airtime" on blogs like MR, but other than that?

Really scratching my head. Since this probably wasn't pre-planned from the launch start, I'll probably go with the "desperation" crowd...
 
I think the idea is to get you to think about the level of detail put into the watch - not just the device itself but the tiny things like custom shot flowers for watch faces. Having the flowers so huge says "hey look at this totally insignificant thing we did but we're so proud of, we like detail". Not just "hey buy the apple watch"

Like anyone buying the watch knows or cares that they specifically shot pictures of flowers for it. LOL
 
Really? I'd say he was right to predict a demise in Swiss sales. Not sure all of this can be attributed to smart wearables, but certainly it's a contributing cause.

Bad Times For Swiss Watches As Sales Slump
http://news.sky.com/story/1538783/bad-times-for-swiss-watches-as-sales-slump

Nobody is buying Swiss watches anymore apart from the 'astonishing' French
http://www.businessinsider.in/Nobod...e-astonishing-French/articleshow/48555639.cms
You do realize that all the mechanisms described in these articles will also hurt Apple, right?
- China slowdown
- Fight against corruption
- Manufacturer's currency appreciation
 
  • Like
Reactions: waveboreale
They sure are trying hard to sell this even though it can't do anything an iPhone can't already. Smart watches in general are a waist of time imo. At least right now.
 
It doesn't. Those who want a LV bag will get one anyway. For all others, such advertising is just money down the drain.

The fact that they can afford to "waste" that much money on advertising signals a powerful, rich and desirable brand, whether consciously or subconsciously. Just look at diamonds.
 
The fact that they can afford to "waste" that much money on advertising signals a powerful, rich and desirable brand, whether consciously or subconsciously. Just look at diamonds.
What about diamonds? They're a brand now that is being advertised?

Seriously though: LV might be perfectly fine with the "desirable brand" approach. Because they know this is the best they can go for since only those who have "too much money" will want to buy one of their bags anyway; i.e., they hardly have to create a clientele for their products (with the notable exception of China).

For the Apple watch, however, it should be all about getting people interested in buying one in the first place. So how is this "luxury brand" advertising going to do this trick with the average John D (who happens to have the 350 USD required available because the Apple watch might be a fashion item but certainly not a luxurious one)?
 
Last edited:
It doesn't. Those who want a LV bag will get one anyway. For all others, such advertising is just money down the drain.

Its keeping the brand's high end image in the public eye as something to aspire too.

You think that those company's have built their high end image only on word of mouth and high quality products?
That's simply not enough in a crowded marketplace (even in Luxury) and the always fickle fashion world.
High end brands are always very highly visible in high end areas because it works.
Even in those that already buy these brands, reinforcing the attractiveness of the brand is crucial.
Out of sight, out of mind is true in fashion more than anywhere else.

Also, if only a few high fashion and national news source report about it, it has already paid its dues.
Like this: many more will follow.
http://www.harpersbazaar.co.uk/fashion/fashion-news/selfridges-windows-flowers-apple-watch
 
I honestly wonder what the ROI of such an advertisement is? I mean - it must cost a leg but it's still only a physical display in a department store window in a single city. It may create some internet "airtime" on blogs like MR, but other than that?

Really scratching my head. Since this probably wasn't pre-planned from the launch start, I'll probably go with the "desperation" crowd...
It's a high profile location in s prominent location frequented by the rich and tourists. It's more about the Apple brand than anything else, creating a lasting impression for people who pass by the windows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Recognition
Its keeping the brand's high end image in the public eye as something to aspire too.

You think that those company's have built their high end image only on word of mouth and high quality products?
That's simply not enough in a crowded marketplace (even in Luxury) and the always fickle fashion world.
High end brands are always very highly visible in high end areas because it works.
Even in those that already buy these brands, reinforcing the attractiveness of the brand is crucial.
Out of sight, out of mind is true in fashion more than anywhere else.

Also, if only a few high fashion and national news source report about it, it has already paid its dues.
Like this: many more will follow.
http://www.harpersbazaar.co.uk/fashion/fashion-news/selfridges-windows-flowers-apple-watch
I've shared my thoughts on the difference between LV (et al.) bags and the Apple watch in my post above yours...

I think my question still stands: This Selfridge window, will - it - help - sell - more - watches ???

And one more thing: I feel the whole marketing effort for the Apple watch is mislead because:
a) Apple/Ahrendts chose to go down the fashion/luxury road;
b) Men (who are generally more prone to be interested in new tech), are less interested in luxury/fashion.
 
Marketing is weird. How is seeing a backdrop or pictures of flowers going to get me to buy an Apple Watch?

It connects the image of the sublime and beautiful with the Apple Watch. Now whenever you think of other brands you will think how utterly ugly and uninspired they are.:p
 
I've shared my thoughts on the difference between LV (et al.) bags and the Apple watch in my post above yours...

I think my question still stands: This Selfridge window, will - it - help - sell - more - watches ???

And one more thing: I feel the whole marketing effort for the Apple watch is mislead because:
a) Apple/Ahrendts chose to go down the fashion/luxury road;
b) Men (who are generally more prone to be interested in new tech), are less interested in luxury/fashion.

It helps to sell the brand further (associating creativity, luxury, beauty, imagination to it), associates that very strong brand and images with the watch, thus it helps sell the watch. It's the kind of billboard people will walk a few blocks out of their way to see.

It also gives them a lot of free PR in the UK over the next month in the quiet late summer days until the Iphone launch when the mediasphere is less saturated and thus there is a bigger chance this kind of thing will be reported.

One thing that's been mentioned in what, a million posts you seemingly skipped.
A fine WATCH, it is fashion accessory which is made with the highest technical knowhow first and a functional tech adjunct second. Same thing for the Apple Watch as the first wearable that's old as fashion and not a tech toy.

Most of the tech in the Apple Watch is blended in its design and UI enabling it to be fashionable. The Apple Watch is fashionable because it is a tech marvel. So, in selling one they sell the other.

That's why it is sold this way, and that's how it should be sold.

Others that went the all tech/low end way have had their ASS KICKED hard.
Samsung's watch sells 1/10 the volume of Apple and they sold 6 versions!!

The men who are interested in tech and design (you know design and fashion are closely related don't you?) are the same people who buy expensive Apple stuff that are stylishly designed and very very compact (like the Watch).

Apple has the objective to clearly delineate the watch as a mid high to high end design/fashion/tech product to clearly differentiate themselves from others who will come later in very very big number at the lower end (like in phones). It is what it always does.

Usually, their marketing is design/tech on the same level, the design/fashion angle is slightly at the forefront because it is a wearable. So, their goal in fashion is the same as their goal in everything else they have done in the last 15 years.

Finally, you should actually read other people's posts? Doesn't seem you do.
I told you how it does it in the post you quote and just went on your own tangent.

Considering Apple has probably sold close to 4-5M watches by now with, increased distribution, more countries, and the holiday push coming, I think they know what their doing....
 
It helps to sell the brand further (associating creativity, luxury, beauty, imagination to it), associates that very strong brand and images with the watch, thus it helps sell the watch. It's the kind of billboard people will walk a few blocks out of their way to see.

It also gives them a lot of free PR in the UK over the next month in the quiet late summer days until the Iphone launch when the mediasphere is less saturated and thus there is a bigger chance this kind of thing will be reported.

One thing that's been mentioned in what, a million posts you seemingly skipped.
A fine WATCH, it is fashion accessory which is made with the highest technical knowhow first and a functional tech adjunct second. Same thing for the Apple Watch as the first wearable that's old as fashion and not a tech toy.

Most of the tech in the Apple Watch is blended in its design and UI enabling it to be fashionable. The Apple Watch is fashionable because it is a tech marvel. So, in selling one they sell the other.

That's why it is sold this way, and that's how it should be sold.

Others that went the all tech/low end way have had their ASS KICKED hard.
Samsung's watch sells 1/10 the volume of Apple and they sold 6 versions!!

The men who are interested in tech and design (you know design and fashion are closely related don't you?) are the same people who buy expensive Apple stuff that are stylishly designed and very very compact (like the Watch).

Apple has the objective to clearly delineate the watch as a mid high to high end design/fashion/tech product to clearly differentiate themselves from others who will come later in very very big number at the lower end (like in phones). It is what it always does.

Usually, their marketing is design/tech on the same level, the design/fashion angle is slightly at the forefront because it is a wearable. So, their goal in fashion is the same as their goal in everything else they have done in the last 15 years.

Finally, you should actually read other people's posts? Doesn't seem you do.
I told you how it does it in the post you quote and just went on your own tangent.

Considering Apple has probably sold close to 4-5M watches by now with, increased distribution, more countries, and the holiday push coming, I think they know what their doing....
I appreciate your detailed response but you make it sound like marketing is a solid science. I just don't think it is... because people change and what worked for other luxury items might just not work for the Apple watch. I guess we'll see a couple months down the road whether they maintain their fashion stance (BTW: I don't agree with you that, for Apple, design and fashion are closely related).
 
Like anyone buying the watch knows or cares that they specifically shot pictures of flowers for it. LOL

Like I said, its not about the flowers specifically, its about showing the level of detail they put into creating it as a whole. Not that I should be taking seriously anyone who still says "lol"
 
Like I said, its not about the flowers specifically, its about showing the level of detail they put into creating it as a whole. Not that I should be taking seriously anyone who still says "lol"

I watched just to see and I was right, I knew this forum would somehow twist a beautiful installation into something negative
 
Btw, here's the wired piece on how Apple created the motion faces on the Watch:

http://www.wired.com/2015/04/apple-watch-design/
“We shot all this stuff,” Dye says, “the butterflies and the jellyfish and the flowers for the motion face, it’s all in-camera. And so the flowers were shot blooming over time. I think the longest one took us 285 hours, and over 24,000 shots.”
 
b) Men (who are generally more prone to be interested in new tech), are less interested in luxury/fashion.
Therefore... Women (who are generally more prone to be interested in luxury/fashion), are less interested in new tech.

So... You advertise heavily in the most luxurious and fashionable shop in London.

I think you answered your own question there...
 
I honestly wonder what the ROI of such an advertisement is? I mean - it must cost a leg but it's still only a physical display in a department store window in a single city. It may create some internet "airtime" on blogs like MR, but other than that?

Really scratching my head. Since this probably wasn't pre-planned from the launch start, I'll probably go with the "desperation" crowd...
There was a film crew outside Selfridges last night from about midnight till past 5:00am, filming each window display, I think that we'll be seeing a lot of this window display in the next few weeks.
 
Maybe it's gives off a different feeling live, but in pictures the product seems overwhelmed by the photography rather than enhanced. It doesn't seem engaging like so many Apple Store displays have been.

It's actually worse in real life.
 
I honestly wonder what the ROI of such an advertisement is? I mean - it must cost a leg but it's still only a physical display in a department store window in a single city. It may create some internet "airtime" on blogs like MR, but other than that?

Really scratching my head. Since this probably wasn't pre-planned from the launch start, I'll probably go with the "desperation" crowd...
I'm not entirely certain, but I'd imagine that Apple don't need to ensure there's a $ return attached to these types of campaigns, I think they have their finances sorted.
 
It doesn't. Those who want a LV bag will get one anyway. For all others, such advertising is just money down the drain.

So you know how to get as many people to buy high priced products as LVMH does without any expensive advertising? Congratulations. After you start your company you'll be rich. How soon?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.