I said download XNU which is part of Darwin.Actually, wouldn't downloading the source for Darwin be a bit better of an idea?
I said download XNU which is part of Darwin.Actually, wouldn't downloading the source for Darwin be a bit better of an idea?
Again:Please explain how a 4 month delay equals Apple not caring about OS X and dumping it. Please explain your logic here or lack thereof...I can't wait to hear this. I don't remembering anyone saying MS didn't care about windows anymore even though it was delayed over and over again!
That is pretty pathetic. It better be one great phone. (It looks like it probably will be, but I can't be sure.)
All the more reason that to NOT BUY A MAC until Leopard and hardware are released. You will have an old interface which will not be 100% functional on your existing hardware.
That these new products run OSX is irrelevant. Do I ever see OSX? Can I develop software to run on Apple TV or the iPhone? Apple so far says no. They could run Windows for all I care. The user never sees it, developers never see it.Whoah there, Captain Logic! How does a product delay indicate a lack of value? There are two BRAND NEW OS X products added to the mix already, with a good chance of more to come.
No it is more like Vista getting delayed because some key folks also needed to work on another variant of Windows (which actually happened... one of the major delays in Vista development was folks going to work on Windows XP SP 2 to improve its security).When reality is pathetic, drink some kool-aid.
This is like Vista getting delayed cos of Zune.
Sorry I am not wrong (been working with Apple since 1984 by the way). Apple's first official statement about Leopard was done at WWDC 06. The rest is speculation or off comments.Shawnce, you're plain wrong. I guess you just haven't been around long enough to remember. Originally, it was slated to come out at the exact same time as Vista (Fall '06), even BEFORE Vista was delayed.
This thread is ridiculous. Yeah, YOU guys care about Leopard, but think about what the public at large cares about? iPods, and the iPhone. An iPhone delay would be WAY worse for Apple's stock price than this Leopard delay. So, while somewhat disappointing, I'd much rather Leopard be delayed and work better AND have the iPhone out on time.
Plus, this helps me spread out my Apple spending: DRM-free music in May, iPhone in June, Leopard in October. Plus I'm sure we'll see more features shown off at WWDC now, rather than having everything sprung on us at once. Devs have more time to prep with a more final build... all in all I actually think this is a good thing. Based on what we already knew about architectural enhancements I don't think there was any question that this was the biggest upgrade of OS X yet. I'd rather have it be guaranteed to work well.
Shawnce, you're plain wrong...it was slated to come out at the exact same time as Vista (Fall '06), even BEFORE Vista was delayed.
I wouldn't exactly say that ... personally I saw nothing out of line with typical variation between developer previews. This stuff happens when they start to expose / flesh out more of the feature set... more things you can poke at and more things that can break as a result.The delay is because the last seed of 10.5 was MORE buggy than the previous- with many critical errors.
For real. What could they possibly put into Leapord that would wow me? I know make my mac 2 x faster. That I would be happy with. Or make safari faster.![]()
Actually, that's what many within Apple and the developers ARE saying. They're saying that the latest builds were actually worse than the earlier ones, more buggy, more problems, etc.I wouldn't exactly say that ... nothing out of line with typical variation between developer previews. This stuff happens when they start to expose / flesh out more of the feature set... more things you can poke at and more things that can break as a result.
more I'm thinking the best new super-secret feature will be a skin-able calculator.
Exactly that was in the realm of basic / opportunistic core-affinity I was think about would be possible on Tiger ... I just didn't know it was already in placeThanks, got it. ... It does take the logical step of trying to run on the previous processor if that processor is still idle; this works well as long as you don't have more runnable threads than cores.
Even CNET suspects that the delay is possibly a lie.
It isn't because Apple needs to devote more resources to iPhone. iPhone was functional at least as a phone, browser, calendar, SMS, and iPod even last year when it was previewed. What more needs to be fixed? We SAW all these features demonstrated.
The delay is because the last seed of 10.5 was MORE buggy than the previous- with many critical errors.
Leopard is having major major probs, and Apple can't just come out and say that, or else it will scare people.
Even CNET suspects that the delay is possibly a lie.
It isn't because Apple needs to devote more resources to iPhone. iPhone was functional at least as a phone, browser, calendar, SMS, and iPod even last year when it was previewed. What more needs to be fixed? We SAW all these features demonstrated.
The delay is because the last seed of 10.5 was MORE buggy than the previous- with many critical errors.
Leopard is having major major probs, and Apple can't just come out and say that, or else it will scare people.